230 likes | 380 Views
Computational Functionalism. Motivations. A functionalist general purpose input-output device certainly sounds like a computer Mind does informational things A machine implementation of functionalism is natural Computational functions are multiply realisable. Turing Machine.
E N D
Motivations • A functionalist general purpose input-output device certainly sounds like a computer • Mind does informational things • A machine implementation of functionalism is natural • Computational functions are multiply realisable
Turing Machine • Turing machines consist of: • an infinite tape divided into squares • a head that reads from and writes to the tape • a finite set of internal states; q0, …, qn • a finite alphabet; b1, …, bm
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 + 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 + 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 + 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 + 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 1 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 1 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 1 1 1 # # q0
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 1 1 1 # # q1
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 1 1 # # # Halt
Turing Machine # # 1 1 1 + 1 1 # # q0
Machine Functionalism • The computational functionalist claim is that the mind can be thought of as a TM • Mental states of Stephen are to be identified with the internal states of Stephen’s TM
Psychology • Instrumentalism A theory predicts • Realism A theory explains
Difficulties • Identity • What does it means for A to have the same mental state as B? • q0 is only definable as the triplet: {<1, 1Rq0>, <+, 1Rq0>, <#, #Lq1>} • Each state is defined in terms of the other states • Different psychologies can’t even be compared
Difficulties • Simulation • Do we think that a weather simulation program actually has weather going on inside it?
Turing Test • If a machine passes a test that we think could only be passed by a thinking thing then we have no grounds to deny that the machine is thinking. • Have a conversation with A and B, one of them a machine, the other a person. If you can’t tell which is the machine then both are thinking.
The Chinese Room • Searle thought that the idea that mental states could be identified with computational states was almost demonstrably incorrect.
The Chinese Room • Responses • System The room + the man + … understands • Reply Let him memorise it all
The Chinese Room • Responses • Robot Connect the room to the world • Reply What is the robot really receiving?
The Chinese Room • Responses • Simulator Make the room look like the brain • Reply Where’s computation now?
The Chinese Room • Searle thinks that only machines can think, ie. brains, but not by computing.