1 / 18

Predicting the 3D Structure of RNA motifs Ali Mokdad – UCSF May 28, 2007

Predicting the 3D Structure of RNA motifs Ali Mokdad – UCSF May 28, 2007. Predicting RNA structure. Existing RNA folding algorithms (mfold, sfold, pfold, Dynalign) determine the locations of cWW helices.

Download Presentation

Predicting the 3D Structure of RNA motifs Ali Mokdad – UCSF May 28, 2007

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Predicting the 3D Structure of RNA motifs Ali Mokdad – UCSF May 28, 2007

  2. Predicting RNA structure • Existing RNA folding algorithms (mfold, sfold, pfold, Dynalign) determine the locations of cWW helices. • Internal loops, hairpin loops, and junctions are represented as “bulges” or unstructured areas between these helices. • Many of these “bulges” have stable 3D structures that in many cases allow the whole molecule to carry its function. • Many long-range interactions in the same RNA molecule, or interactions between RNA and other molecules occur at these locations. • If we can determine the structures of these areas, we can target them with drugs, and we can better understand their mechanisms and functions...

  3. Predicting 3D structure of RNA loops • RNA loops are mostly made of non-WC BPs. • These non-WC BPs are less common than helical WC BPs, but they still make a good portion (ca. 1/3). • To complicate things, the non-WC BPs are not all homogeneous, instead they belong to any of a dozen or so geometric types*. • As a results, their 3D-structures eluded computational prediction for so long. *Leontis & Westhof, RNA 2001, v7: 499-512

  4. Isostericity-based structure prediction • Comparative Sequence Analysis has been very successful in predicting cis WC BPs. • The problem with applying that onto non-WC BPs is that their allowed patterns of substitutions are more diverse and less obvious than cis WC substitutions. • To some extent these patterns were not even known until recently* *Leontis, Stombaugh, & Westhof, NAR 2002, v30: 3497-531

  5. ISFOLD: a small first stepto solve a big problem • ISFOLD looks in sequence alignments for patterns similar to the known isosteric substitution patterns of base pairs. • This similarity can be scored and ranked, and based on it predictions of individual BP occurrences (their types and locations) can be made. • Such structural predictions are, of course, as good as the sequence alignments are. • For the best results, the alignments should be highly accurate and large, but also divergent enough to show substitutions in places of interest.

  6. CSA example from 5S rRNA • CSA looks in sequence alignments for canonical “mutual compensating mutations” (C=G, G=C, A–U, U–A, and G/U & U/G) that covary in two alignment positions (or columns). cWW cWW cWW ? ?

  7. tWS cWS

  8. ISFOLD GUI

  9. ISFOLD predictions for the 5S rRNA BPs All Correct predictions!

  10. ISFOLD predictions for the whole motif Note: #26 is 75%A & 25%C

  11. Summary of all 5S ISFOLD predictions Also: discovered 2 mistakes in original classification of BPs from crystal structure

  12. ISFOLD can also use mutation data (Viable and lethal mutations determined experimentally) (An example from viroids)

  13. Predicting Loop E motif in Viroids Published model* Without mutation data With mutation data (My viroids alignment is low quality) *Zhong et al, J Virol 2006, v80: 8566-81

  14. Conclusions • This software predicts not just cWW BPs, but all types of BPs from sequence alignments. • ISFOLD does 2 tasks: • Predicts which 2 nucleotides are interacting to form a BP (location). • Predicts which specific type of interaction is most probably formed. • Good results when based on good alignments (5S rRNA). • Results dramatically improved when mutation data is used. • The higher the quality of the alignment, the better the predictions. • By good alignment quality I mean 3 things: • Large number of sequences • Enough variability between sequences • But not too much variability that might mean complete change of the 3D motif (motif swap).

  15. ISFOLD:Mission is NOT accomplished • ISFOLD as it is now is only the beginning, it provides a framework that can be added upon in the future… • One thing to consider is that RNA recurrent motifs (such as internal and hairpin loops) occur as whole units – groups of individual BPs tend to occur together.

  16. ISFOLD:Mission is NOT accomplished • ISFOLD as it is now is only the beginning, it provides a framework that can be added upon in the future… • One thing to consider is that RNA recurrent motifs (such as internal and hairpin loops) occur as whole units – groups of individual BPs tend to occur together. • When a good structural library of observed recurrent motifs becomes available (like SCOR database), ISFOLD could be modified to study whole motifs at once (specific stacks of BPs can be scored together)

More Related