320 likes | 999 Views
IMACS History and Development of Myositis Clinical Trials. Muscle Study Group September 21, 2010. Chester V. Oddis, MD University of Pittsburgh. Disclosures. Genentech: Grant support. Lecture Objectives. Overview of myositis in the past decade “Birth” of a clinical trial in myositis.
E N D
IMACS History and Development of Myositis Clinical Trials Muscle Study Group September 21, 2010 Chester V. Oddis, MD University of Pittsburgh
Disclosures • Genentech: Grant support
Lecture Objectives • Overview of myositis in the past decade • “Birth” of a clinical trial in myositis
Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy • Rare disease • Affect children and adults • Paucity of controlled trials • Unreliable and insensitive outcome measures • 2-specialty disease (neurology/rheumatology) • Systemic disease
Areas to Address in Myositis Trials • Sufficient sample size • Relevant outcomes for clinical trials • Special aspects of myositis influencing trial design: • Heterogeneity • Clinical diversity • Activity vs. damage • Barriers to studying novel therapies
Summary: Published Trials in IIM (2000) • Lack of consistent design in published trials • 26 prospective myositis trials reviewed • 14 adult PM-DM; 5 adult IBM; 5 JDM; 2 adult PM/DM/IBM • Problems with published trials • different myositis classification criteria used • lack of uniformity with inclusion/exclusion criteria • variability in concomitant therapies • variability in trial durations and subsequent follow-up • different intervals of assessment • lack of uniformity in measures for outcome assessments
Fred Miller Lisa Rider David Isenberg
IMACS • Coalition of health care providers with experience and interest in the myositis syndromes • Goal: Improve the lives of children and adults with myositis • Discover better therapies through understanding the causes of myositis
Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy • Rare disease • Affect children and adults • Paucity of controlled trials • Unreliable and insensitive outcome measures • 2-specialty disease (neurology/rheumatology) • Systemic disease • IMACS: International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group • Adult and pediatric rheumatologists, neurologists, physiatrists and dermatologists organized to address these deficiencies
Myositis Clinical Trials: “Pieces of the Puzzle” • Establishment of IMACS • Adult/pediatric/multidisciplinary/international
Areas to Address in Myositis Trials • Sufficient sample size (IMACS) • Relevant outcomes for clinical trials • Special aspects of myositis influencing trial design: • Heterogeneity • Clinical diversity • Activity vs. damage • Barriers to studying novel therapies
Areas to Address in Myositis Trials • Sufficient sample size (IMACS) • Relevant outcomes for clinical trials • Special aspects of myositis influencing trial design: • Heterogeneity • Clinical diversity • Activity vs. damage • Barriers to studying novel therapies
Step 1:Development of Preliminary Core Set Measures for Myositis Outcome in Clinical Trials • Evaluate measures used in previous trials • Assess the validation of published instruments • Discuss at international consensus conference • Further refine using IMACS group (Delphi method)
Assessing Outcome in Myositis • Proposed core set measures to assess 5 domains that were determined to capture myositis disease activity • 5 domains include: • Global disease activity • Muscle strength • Physical function • Laboratory evaluation • Extramuscular manifestations
Domains of Disease Activity and Core Set Measures for Assessing Outcome in Myositis Miller, Rheumatology, 2001
Myositis Clinical Trials: “Pieces of the Puzzle” • Establishment of IMACS • Adult/pediatric/multidisciplinary/international • Agreed upon outcome measures [Miller]
Step 2: Clinically Meaningful Improvement in Core Set Measures Rider, J Rheum, 2003
Step 3:Definition of Improvement in a Clinical Trial • Tedious process including face to face meetings of adult and pediatric experts (n=29) • Review of 102 adult and 102 juvenile paper patient profiles using nominal group techniques • Experts’ consensus ratings as a gold standard and their judgment of clinically meaningful change in the core set measures • Candidate DOIs developed from this consensus
Preliminary Definition of Improvement for IIM Clinical Trials Three of any 6 of the core set measures improved by ≥ 20%, with no more than 2 worse by ≥ 25% (which cannot include MMT) Rider, Arth Rheum, 2004
Myositis Clinical Trials: “Pieces of the Puzzle” • Establishment of IMACS • Adult/pediatric/multidisciplinary/international • Agreed upon outcome measures [Miller] • Definition(s) of improvement for myositis clinical trials [Rider]
Areas to Address in Myositis Trials • Sufficient sample size (IMACS) • Relevant outcomes for clinical trials • Special aspects of myositis influencing trial design: • Heterogeneity • Clinical diversity • Activity vs. damage • Barriers to studying novel therapies
General Trial Design Issues • IIM subgroups to be included in myositis clinical trials • Classification criteria to be utilized for trial entry • Other inclusion criteria for trial entry • Exclusion criteria for trial entry • Stratification of patients at outcome analysis • Concomitant therapy allowable during myositis clinical trial • Trial duration/use of placebo • Outcome and safety (drug toxicity) assessment intervals during active treatment phase of clinical trial • Clinical worsening to allow for change in therapy • Drop out criteria for myositis trials • Post-trial therapy assessments • Definitions of complete clinical response and remission
Step 4: Strategy to Develop Consensus for IIM Clinical Trials • Step 1: Ascertain expert opinion on key trial design questions (Delphi approach: Survey #1) • 41 adult and 27 pediatric specialists responded to Email survey • Included rheumatologists, neurologists, dermatologists, physiatrists • Step 2: Establish both areas of consensus (set at 2/3 agreement) and controversy through review of surveys • Step 3: Address unresolved clinical trial design issues (Survey #2) • 38 adult and 31 pediatric specialists responded to 2nd Email survey • Step 4: Resolution of controversial trial design issues using nominal group technique ( 70% agreement) • Completed at 2003 IMACS Workshop • Step 5: Develop and publish a consensus document: “Guidelines for Clinical Trials in Adult and Juvenile Myositis” Oddis, Arth Rheum, 2005
Myositis Clinical Trials: “Pieces of the Puzzle” • Establishment of IMACS • Adult/pediatric/multidisciplinary/international • Agreed upon outcome measures [Miller] • Definition(s) of improvement for myositis clinical trials [Rider] • Multidisciplinary, international consensus on conduct of clinical trials [Oddis/Rider]
Areas to Address in Myositis Trials • Sufficient sample size (IMACS) • Relevant outcomes for clinical trials • Special aspects of myositis influencing trial design: • Heterogeneity • Clinical diversity • Activity vs. damage • Barriers to studying novel therapies
Activity and Damage Tools in Myositis • Myositis Disease Activity and Assessment Tool (MDAAT) • Reliable and valid instrument to assess myositis activity • Extra muscular manifestations (constitutional, cutaneous, articular, GI, pulmonary, cardiac) [Sultan/Isenberg, Arth Rheum, 2008] • Myositis Damage Index (MDI) [Rider, Arth Rheum, 2009]
Myositis Clinical Trials: “Pieces of the Puzzle” • Establishment of IMACS • Adult/pediatric/multidisciplinary/international • Agreed upon outcome measures [Miller] • Definition(s) of improvement for myositis clinical trials [Rider] • Multidisciplinary, international consensus on the conduct of adult and juvenile myositis clinical trials [Oddis/Rider] • Assessment of disease activity and damage [Sultan/Isenberg; Rider]
Areas to Address in Myositis Trials • Sufficient sample size (IMACS) • Relevant outcomes for clinical trials • Special aspects of myositis influencing trial design: • Heterogeneity • Clinical diversity • Activity vs. damage • Barriers to studying novel therapies
Rituximab in Myositis Rituximab in the Treatment of Refractory Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis (DM) and Adult Polymyositis (PM) University of Pittsburgh Coordinating Center
Summary • Significant progress in myositis clinical trials over the past decade • Ability to test some of these advances by analyzing data in the ‘RIM Study‘ and ‘Etanercept in DM Study’ • Proactive in design of upcoming trials using novel agents and novel biomarkers