210 likes | 374 Views
Extending survival in relapsed indolent lymphoma with induction and maintenance. Rien van Oers Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Maintenance in indolent lymphoma: Rationale. Prolonged remission predicts for improved overall survival 1 –3
E N D
Extending survival in relapsed indolent lymphoma with induction and maintenance Rien van OersAcademic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Maintenance in indolent lymphoma: Rationale • Prolonged remission predicts for improved overall survival1–3 • Delays the need for next treatment (QoL) • Improves response quality over time (PR CR) • Eradicates minimal residual disease, thereby potentially increasing overall survival 1. Gallagher C, et al. J Clin Oncol 1986; 4:14701480. 2. Weisdorf D, et al.J Clin Oncol 1992; 10:942947. 3. Montoto S, et al. Ann Oncol 2002; 13:523530.
The EORTC 20981 trial CHOP or R-CHOP followed by rituximab maintenance therapy or observation
Study design R A N D O M I S E R A N D O M I S E R-CHOP q21dmaximum 6 cycles Rituximab maintenance therapy* CRPR n = 234 n = 167 CHOP q21dmaximum 6 cycles Observation n = 167 n = 231 * 375 mg/m2 every 3 months for 2 years or until relapse van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Patient characteristics van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Rituximab-based induction chemotherapy improves response rates * p < 0.0001 van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Rituximab-based induction chemotherapy significantly improves PFS 100 90 80 70 60 Patients (%) 50 R-CHOP median: 33.1 months 40 CHOP median: 20.2 months 30 20 10 p < 0.001 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Years van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Rituximab maintenance prolongs PFS by more than 3 years PFS after R-CHOP/CHOP induction in EORTC 20981 trial 100 90 PFS > 3 years 80 70 Rituximab maintenance median: 51.5 months 60 Patients (%) 50 40 30 Observation median: 14.9 months 20 10 p < 0.001 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Years van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Rituximab maintenance improves PFS irrespective of induction regimen PFS after CHOP induction PFS after R-CHOP induction 100 100 80 80 MaintenanceMedian: 51.8 months Maintenancemedian: 42.2 months 60 60 40 40 Observationmedian: 11.6 months ObservationMedian: 23.0 months 20 20 p < 0.001 p = 0.004 0 0 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 Years Years van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Rituximab maintenance improves PFS irrespective of induction response PFS after CR PFS after PR 100 100 Maintenancemedian: 51.6 months 80 80 Maintenancemedian: 45.4 months 60 60 Observationmedian: 14.5 months 40 40 Observationmedian: 15.6 months 20 20 p = 0.0009 p < 0.0001 0 0 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 Years Years van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Rituximab maintenance significantly improves overall survival OS after CHOP/R-CHOP induction in EORTC 20981 trial 100 Rituximab maintenance: 3 years 85.1% 90 80 70 60 Patients (%) 50 40 Observation: 3 years 77.1% 30 20 p = 0.011 HR: 0.52 10 0 0 1 2 3 4 6 5 Years van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
Benefits of a 3-year prolonged remission • Improved quality of life • Less disease-related symptoms • Fewer therapies administered over time • Less hospital time • Less time dealing with therapy-associated side-effects • Prolonged remission associated with significant improvement in overall survival
The GLSG trial FCM or R-FCM followed by rituximab maintenance therapy or observation
Rituximabplus4 x FCM 4 x FCM Study design Rituximab maintenance therapy* R A N D O M I S E R A N D O M I S E CR/PR Advanced stage relapsed/refractory FL or MCL Observation only CR/PR * 4 x rituximab (375 mg/m2) at 3 and 9 months after induction Forstpointner R, et al. Blood 2004; 104:3064–3071.
1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Rituximab-based induction therapy improves survival in relapsed/refractory FL Randomised to R-FCM (29/37) Added to R-FCM arm (55/65) Probability Randomised to FCM (17/31) p = 0.0310; p = 0.0290 Time (years after start of therapy) Forstpointner R, et al. Blood 2004; 104:3064–3071 and update.
Rituximab maintenance after rituximab-based induction significantly prolongs remission in FL 1.0 Response duration after R-FCM induction 0.9 0.8 Maintenance (32/41) 0.7 0.6 Probability 0.5 0.4 0.3 Observation (21/40) 0.2 0.1 p = 0.035 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (years after start of therapy) Forstpointner R, et al. Blood 2006; 108:4003–4008.
Rituximab maintenance after rituximab-based induction extends survival 1.0 OS after R-FCM induction 0.9 0.8 Maintenance (56/67) 0.7 0.6 Probability 0.5 Observation (49/71) 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 p = 0.0562 0.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Time (years after end of induction) Forstpointner R, et al. Blood 2006; 108:4003–4008.
Rituximab maintenance therapy Toxicity profile of rituximab allows prolonged treatment beyond induction
EORTC trial: Rituximab maintenance therapy is well tolerated No treatment-related deaths were observed with rituximab maintenance therapy van Oers M, et al. Blood 2006; 108:3296–3301.
GLSG trial: No significant increase in grade 3/4 events with rituximab maintenance Forstpointner R, et al. Blood 2006; 108:4003–4008.
Rituximab-based induction and maintenance is the standard of care for relapsed FL • Rituximab-based induction therapy improves response rates • Maximises the number of patients able to benefit from rituximab maintenance • Rituximab maintenance improves PFS by more than 3 years • Extended remission improves patient QoL • Rituximab maintenance improves overall survival