450 likes | 679 Views
Oil Sands 101. ERG Victoria Jan 09 Roger Bailey. Alberta Tar Sands. Big, Tough Expensive Job Not Economic Depends on government handouts Dirty Oil Pollutes the Environment Air: SOx, Nox, CO 2 , Climate Water: consumption, toxic sludge Land: Devastates Boreal forest Destroys society.
E N D
Oil Sands 101 ERG Victoria Jan 09 Roger Bailey
Alberta Tar Sands • Big, Tough Expensive Job • Not Economic • Depends on government handouts • Dirty Oil • Pollutes the Environment • Air: SOx, Nox, CO2, Climate • Water: consumption, toxic sludge • Land: Devastates Boreal forest • Destroys society
Alberta Oil Sands • World’s largest oil deposit 2,000,000,000,000 • Established Reserves: 173,000,000 barrels • Canada’s economic engine • $70 billion invested, $70 billion planned • Now 1.2 million BPD, 5 million BPD in 2030 • Creates Jobs and Wealth • Mining yesterday’s technology • In-Situ SAGD is the future
What Changed? • Price of oil over $50 / bbl • “The end of cheap oil” • Government Policy. • Technology • Resources to Reserves
What Recently Changed? • Price of oil under $40 / bbl • Not “the end of cheap oil” • Government Policy • Royalties up (Syncrude + $2 billion) • Taxation: No accelerated CCA • CO2 Penalties • Technology: CO2 focus • Resources to Reserves? Economics
AOSTRA • Alberta Oil Sands Technology and Research Authority • Alberta invested $750 million in R&D • Industry matched funding and did the work • Enabling Technologies • Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage (SAGD) • Cold Water Extraction (OCWE) • Consolidated Tailings (CT)
Alberta Oil Production Source: CERI Study CAPP Backgrounder 2008
Alberta Oil Update Dec 2008 Source: CAPP Update Dec 2008
Oil Sands Projects Athabasca Mining 1,115,000 –2,977,000 Athabasca In-Situ 324,000 – 1,543,000 Cold Lake In-Situ 219,000 – 280,000 Peace River In-Situ 12,000 – 100,000
Mining Technology Change • Truck and Shovel Hydrotransport Cold Water Extraction Consolidated Tailings
Athabasca – Mining Operator Project Initial Potential Albian/Shell Muskeg/Jackpine 150,000 560,000 Suncor Base Plant 280,000 550,000 Syncrude Base Plant 300,000 600,000 CNRL Horizon (2008) 135,000 577,000 Imperial Kearl (2010) 100,000 300,000 Petro-Canada Fort Hills (2011) 100,000 190,000 Total Joslyn Creek Mine(2013) 50,000 200,000
Athabasca – In Situ - SAGDOperator Project Initial Potential • JACOS Hangingstone 1 0,000 30,000 • Suncor Firebag 68,000 375,000 • ConocoPhillips Surmont 25,000 110,000 • EnCana Christina/Foster 42,000 400,000 • Devon Jackfish 35,000 70,000 • Husky Sunrise (2012) 50,000 200,000 • OPTI/Nexen Long Lake 72,000 288,000 • Petro-Canada MacKay River 22,000 70,000
Cold Lake – In Situ –SAGDOperator Project Initial Potential • Shell Hilda Lake (pilot) 600 20,000 • CNRL Primrose 50,000 110,000 • Imperial Cold Lake (CSS) 150,000 110,000 • Husky Tucker 18,000 40,000 • Peace River – In Situ • Shell Peace River 12,000 100,000
Underground Test Facility (UTF) SAGD Well Pairs Horizontal Injector And Producer Shaft & Tunnel Access
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage • Steam injected in upper horizontal well melts the bitumen • Bitumen flows by gravity down to the lower producing well • Steam chamber grows as bitumen is produced • Recovery over 60%
SAGD Applicability • Resources to Reserves • 352 Billion @ 6% • 239 Billion @ 10% • EUB Reserves in 2000 • 173 Billion based on SAGD • Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage
Steam Assisted Gravity Drainage • SADG needs steam. Steam Oil Ratio ~3 • Steam is water and energy • Both are limited and expensive • Little fresh water: saline and recycle • Expensive water treatment required • Energy? Gas, Co-generation? • Gasification? Pitch? Nuclear?
SAGD CO2 Emissions • Natural gas for steam ~1 GJ/barrel • CO2 Emissions ~60 kg/bbl • Cogeneration: • Gas turbine produces electricity • Exhaust + re-firing produces steam • Cogen steam for SAGD with no CO2 • CO2 in Cogen charged to electricity • CO2 from Cogen less than coal
Nuclear Energy for Oil Sands? Nuclear for steam, electricity and hydrogen is possible but….
Oil Sands Projects Source: CERI Study CAPP Backgrounder 2008
Bitumen Upgrading • Upgrading takes the black out of black oil, the tar (asphalt) • Synthetic crude approximates crude oil for refineries • SCO flows and distils to refinery fuel products • Bitumen needs carbon out or hydrogen in • Capital, energy and CO2 intensive • Refinery integration in US?
Wall of Cash Flow “Wall of Cash Flow”
20 Year Horizon Source: CERI Study CAPP Backgrounder 2008
20 Year Horizon Source: CERI Study CAPP Backgrounder 2008
Oil Sands Challenges • Environmental sustainability • CO2 costs • Natural gas limitations and costs • Fiscal changes, lower returns • Infrastructure limitations • Workforce • New Markets and Pipelines • Upgrading? Moving to US refineries
Inflation: Capital Cost Source: CAPP Backgrounder 2008
Dirty Oil? • Not the “End of Oil” nirvana • Other oil options will be produced • Oil Sands, Oil Shale, Carbonates • Life Cycle Analysis: • 85% of Emissions in use as fuel