270 likes | 410 Views
Spin-1/2 Chains in Uniform and Staggered Fields. Collin Broholm * Johns Hopkins University and NIST Center for Neutron Research. Y. Chen LANL M. Kenzelmann JHU & NIST C. P. Landee Clarke University K. Lefmann Risø National Lab Y. Qiu NIST & Univ. Maryland D. H. Reich JHU
E N D
Spin-1/2 Chains in Uniform and Staggered Fields Collin Broholm* Johns Hopkins University and NIST Center for Neutron Research Y. Chen LANL M. Kenzelmann JHU & NIST C. P. Landee Clarke University K. Lefmann Risø National Lab Y. Qiu NIST & Univ. Maryland D. H. Reich JHU C. Rische Univ. of Copenhagen M. B. Stone Penn State University M. M. Turnbull Clarke University * Supported by the National Science Foundation
Spin-1/2 chain preliminaries • Simple Hamiltonian; complex properties • Good model materials and experimental tools • Integrable through Bethe Ansatz: • Ground state energy • Equal time correlation function • Quantum critical • Exact results for dynamic spin correlations
Copper pyrazine dinitrate C/T (J/mol/K2) //a T2 (K2) Hammar et al. (1999) Cu(C4H4N2)(NO3)2
Magnetic Neutron Scattering The scattering cross section is proportional to the Fourier transformeddynamic spin correlation function NIST Center for Neutron Research
Neutron Scattering from Spin-1/2 chain Stone et al., PRL (2003)
Fermions in spin ½ chain Uniform spin-1/2 chain (XY case for simplicity) Jordan-Wigner transformation Diagonalizes H|| e/J Non interacting fermionic lattice gas q (p)
From band-structure to bounded continuum J e/J w h Q (p) q (p)
Neutron Scattering Stone et al. (2003). Exact two-spinon cross-section Karbach et al. 2000
Neutron Data & Two-Spinon Cross section 1.0 Stone et al., PRL (2003)
Spinons in magnetized spin- ½ chain Broholm et al. (2002)
Uniform Spin ½ chain 0.0 T Stone et al. (2003)
Uniform Spin ½ chain 8.7 T || ^ Stone et al. (2003)
Diagonalization of spin-½ chain in a field + Stone et al. (2003)
Neutron Scattering Pentium Scattering Stone et al. (2003)
Spin-½ chain with two spins per chain unit Landee et al. (1986) CuCl2.2(dimethylsulfoxide) Oshikawa and Affleck (1997) The staggered field is given by
3 2 ħw (meV) 1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 H=0 T Kenzelmann et al. (2003)
3 2 ħw (meV) 1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 H=11 T Kenzelmann et al. (2003)
Bound states from 2-spinon continuum Kenzelmann et al. (2003)
Why staggered field yields bound states Zero field state quasi-long range AFM order Without staggered field distant spinons don’t interact With staggered field solitons separate “good” from “bad” domains, which leads to interactions and bound states
Sine-Gordon mapping of spin-1/2 chain Effective staggered + uniform field spin hamiltonian Spin operators are represented through a phase field relative to incommensurate quasi-long-range order with Lagrangian density • This is sine-Gordon model with interaction term proportional to hs • Spectrum consists of • Solitons, anti-solitons • Breather bound states Oshikawa and Affleck (1997)
Bound states from 2-spinon continuum Breathers n=1,2 and possibly 3 Soliton, M Kenzelmann et al. (2003)
Testing sine-Gordon predictions Theory by Essler-Tsvelik (1998) Cu-Benz Dender et al. (1997). Neel order 0 Neel order Kenzelmann et al. (2003)
Conclusions: S=½ Chain in Uniform Field • H=0: data well described by exact two-spinon continuum scattering • H>0: • Incommensurate correlations from shifted fermi points • Gapless excitation at q=p and q=p-2pm • Neutron scattering data in excellent agreement with finite chain calculations Publications and viewgraphs at http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~broholm/homepage/
Conclusions: S=½ Chain in Staggered Field • Staggered g-tensor and DM interaction inherent to multi-atom cell and produce effective staggered field • Staggered field yields bound states • Features described by sine-Gordon model: • Relative energies of bound states at q=p and p-2p m • Relative intensities of breather excitations • Field dependent incommensurability • Excellent experimental realization of quantum sine-Gordon model Publications and viewgraphs at http://www.pha.jhu.edu/~broholm/homepage/