140 likes | 304 Views
Current Concepts in DVT Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty. Shane Woolever D.O. Agenda. Coumadin LMWH Coumadin v. LMWH Hirudin Hirudin V. LMWH. Coumadin (warfarin). Inhibits Metabolism of Vitamin K Long onset of action (24-72hrs) Long half life Inexpensive
E N D
Current Concepts in DVT Prophylaxis in Total Joint Arthroplasty Shane Woolever D.O.
Agenda • Coumadin • LMWH • Coumadin v. LMWH • Hirudin • Hirudin V. LMWH
Coumadin (warfarin) • Inhibits Metabolism of Vitamin K • Long onset of action (24-72hrs) • Long half life • Inexpensive • Requires routine lab draws • Efficacy and safety well established
Low Molecular Weight Heparins • Effect coagulation cascade at inhibitory level • Requires S/C injections • Relatively expensive • Safe ?
LMWH • Fragmin(dalteparin sodium) • Pharmacia & Upjohn • Lovenox(enoxaparin sodium) • Rhone-Poulenc Rorer • Normiflo(ardeparin sodium) • Wyeth • Orgaran(danaparoid sodium) • Organon
FDA ADVISORY15 December 1997 • As of Nov., 1997 > 30 safety reports involving enoxaparin used concomitantly with spinal anesthesia • neurologic injury - paralysis • 75% were women > 65yrs LMWH and Spinal/Epidural Anesthesia
DVT 26% (49 of 190) Major bleeding complications = LMWH blood loss intra-op = LMWH DVT 15%(28 of 192) > bleeding comps involving wound site > post-op blood transfusions Coumadin v. LMWHJBJS, Nov. 9.,1997,vol 79-A, p.1365-1371. Coumadin LMWH
Cost AnalysisArch Int Med Feb., 1997 • LMWH > cost effectiveness • Warfarin $2.01/day + INR cost • LMWH $15/day • Canadian Study: prices may vary LMWH v.Warfarin
Cost Analysis (GENESYS) LMWH v.Warfarin • LMWH(enoxaparin) $12.89/ dose x2 • Warfarin(2mg) $0.03 • INR $15.00 • LMWH $25.78/day v. Warfarin $15.03/day
LMWH Prophylaxis(post-discharge) • Decrease risk of PE and DVT given 30 days post-discharge • DVT - LMWH v. placebo (6.1% v. 21.4%) • PE - LMWH v. placebo ( #2 v. none) • LMWH (n=131) • placebo (n=131) Orthopedics, Feb. 20, 1997, sup 22-25.
HIRUDIN • Leach Enzyme • Recombinant DNA multiplication • Appears safe • Possibly better than LMWH • Direct thrombin inhibitor
LMWH v. HIRUDINNEJM ,Nov.6, 1997, vol. 337,p.1329-35 • Double bind study @ 31 centers 10 countries (1587 patients) • Safety profiles equal • DVT (overall) DVT(proximal) LMWH 25.5% LMWH 7.5% Hirudin 18.5% Hirudin 4.5% • Overall reduction in risk 28% (P=0.001)
Adjuncts • SCD’s • Early Ambulation • Electrical stimulation- induced contraction (experimental)