1 / 14

Network effects from improved traffic signals

Network effects from improved traffic signals. Kristina Schmidt Transek AB. “ On trial, we penetrate recently discovered areas and the straight road we find only by detours . ...

jamar
Download Presentation

Network effects from improved traffic signals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Network effects from improved traffic signals Kristina Schmidt Transek AB

  2. “On trial, we penetrate recently discovered areas and the straight road we find only by detours. ... Thorough knowledge can only be accomplished by studies of literature on the one hand and practical experience on the other” C G Jung From the preface of the 5:th edition of The Unconscious

  3. BackgroundThe idea was born in an early ITS-evaluation project (TOSCA I) showing large network effects of traffic signals • As routes with improved signals attract traffic the delays will increase because of increased flow. • If the improvements were spread evenly over the urban area the route choice effect should become minimal • The idea was born to study how area strategies for traffic signals can contribute to fulfil traffic policy goals compared to i e construction of roads

  4. Stage I Inventory of strategies for improved traffic signals Development of methodology for transferring data between micro- and macro simulation models Indication of network effects.Comparison between effects calculated by micro simulation models and effects calculated by macro model Stage II Evaluation and comparison of two strategies for implementation of improved traffic signals Traffic effects, emission and safety effects Aim: to stimulate strategic thinking when implementing improved traffic signals

  5. Micro simulation detailed analyses; intersection design and signal settings behaviour rules for individual drivers dynamic - includes variation and randomness in arrival time extremely requiring on quality of input route choice lacking or dubious for disrupted traffic conditions as incidents Macro simulation long-term network effects of larger investments as bridges or by-pass roads traffic flows through network as the consequence of defined relations of speed and flow demand is given for od-pairs as a medium-flow rate for an hour or a day network interaction not considered for ‘normal’ traffic conditions Micro and macro simulation models

  6. Transferring data between micro simulation model and emme/2 Approach #one • Micro simulation of signalised intersection • Volume-delay pairs for turns with different characteristica, i e signal settings, geometry and dependency of flow on interacting links • Estimation of turn delay functions for Emme/2 • Effects on route choice, traffic work and delay

  7. The definition of capacity is the problem to the answer Speed Flow

  8. The delay at low traffic hours is very different for different turns Some signalised junctions are critical. As the traffic is stopped in those, over saturation is stopped, and downstream turns do not show any dependency on flow at all Typical junctions are hard to define Micro simulation experiences

  9. Transferring data between micro simulation model and Emme/2 Approach #two • Micro simulation of signalised intersection before and after improvement • Average turn delay in seconds in the Emme/2 scenarios • Simplification assumption for result analysis: All delays that are dependent of flow refers to the upstream link • Effects on route choice, traffic work and delay

  10. Reduce congestion in inner city of Gothenburg 53 signal intersections were improved The improvement is dependent of the functionality of the signal today - how well the co-ordination works and whether there is public transport prioritisations Evaluation of two strategies - I

  11. Reduce traffic in inner city “Gating” is introduced at 17 intersections and 46 turns 2-minute queuing time at gate The junctions in question were carefully studied in terms of geometry and demand Try to compensate those who have their destination in the city by i e improved signals at parking lots Evaluation of two strategies - II

  12. Vehicle mileage is increased by 3.5% in inner city area Vehicle mileage is decreased by 0.3% in the rest of the urban area Average speed increase in inner city from 26.2 to 27.4 (4%). Average speed for those having their origin and/or destination in city increases from 38.4 to 38.9 kph Average speed for the rest of the traffic is almost unaffected. Reduce congestion - ??

  13. Vehicle mileage in inner city area is decreased by 8.9%. This increase refers to through-traffic only All gated turns but three get a decreased traffic Average speed decreases for the vehicles with destination and/or origin in city with 4% (from 38.4 to 36.7) Emission effects? Reduce traffic by gating

  14. Conclusions • Micro simulation results might be used as an average gain of time. • OD-matrix and location of parking lots more important than detailed coding • The results are easier to analyse if network coding in Emme/2 is detailed • As presumptions are uncertain results should be handled with care but can help the traffic planner anyway.

More Related