80 likes | 96 Views
Fermilab Strategy. Pier Oddone P5 Meeting on Tevatron 2009 Running June 9, 2007. Programs. The Energy Frontier Tevatron, LHC ILC The neutrino frontier Minos, MiniBooNe, SciBooNe NOvA, Minerva Particle Astrophysics SDSS, Pierre Auger, CDMS II DES, CDMS-25kg, SNAP. P5 Recommendations.
E N D
Fermilab Strategy Pier Oddone P5 Meeting on Tevatron 2009 Running June 9, 2007
Programs • The Energy Frontier • Tevatron, LHC • ILC • The neutrino frontier • Minos, MiniBooNe, SciBooNe • NOvA, Minerva • Particle Astrophysics • SDSS, Pierre Auger, CDMS II • DES, CDMS-25kg, SNAP
P5 Recommendations • Highest priorities LHC and ILC • Most of the available resources 60% to ILC R&D • Maintain breadth of the field with other 40% • In FY08 run PEP II and Tevatron,and start: • Dark Energy Survey (DES) • Cold Dark Matter Search Super CDMS-25kg • NOvA long base line neutrino program • Daya Bay reactor neutrino experiment • For the longer term, prepare SNAP and LSST THIS IS A VERY POWERFUL AND EXCITING PROGRAM.
From another angle: timeline • Foundation: must deliver on investments • Tevatron • Neutrino program • Must turn on the LHC and CMS • Must develop the ILC for the long term future • Must have an intermediate program
The most important source of physics • Tevatron is the most important source of discovery through 2009 and possibly longer • Consequently gets the highest priority: • attention to implementing machine upgrades and increased reliability • attention to detector operations and physics analysis during decline of available personnel
Plans at Fermilab • Maintain operational strength in the accelerator arena; recall experts as needed should problems arise • Maintain and slightly increase Computing Division support; continue to develop common solutions for D0 and CDF • Maintain as much as possible the support through Particle Physics Division aiming at stabilizing the support at current levels
Plans of the collaborations • Extremely detailed plans by CDF and D0 with MOUs with collaborating institutions • Experience with past projections have been good • Running through 2009 is doable given present projections -- but extremely tight • Further running beyond 2009 has not been analyzed. It will depend where things stand a year from now as DOE makes 2010 plans.
Conclusion • We would like a positive recommendation from P5 on running through 2009 • We need analysis in the next year on what conditions would lead to running in 2010. After a year: • We will know if there are any hints • We will know more (but not enough!) about the LHC