280 likes | 343 Views
High-t Exclusive Reactions With Real Photons. Gerald A. Miller, UW. Outline. Constituent counting rules- challenge and opportunity (Real) Compton scattering Transition from hadrons to quarks, gluons using nuclear targets (with M. Strikman)
E N D
High-t Exclusive Reactions With Real Photons Gerald A. Miller, UW
Outline • Constituent counting rules- challenge and opportunity • (Real) Compton scattering • Transition from hadrons to quarks, gluons using nuclear targets (with M. Strikman) • Exclusive reactions to test exotic nature of mesons (with M. Strikman)
1973 Remarkable success –quarks are real
Constituent Counting Rules -Assumptions • Physical mesons, baryons –s wave bound states , finite wave function at zero separation • Large s, -t • Disconnected Landshoff graphs unimportant Remarkable success
Large angle pion production ntot -2= 1+3+2+3-2=7 Transition? at s between 3 and 6 GeV2 , t between 1 and 2.2 GeV2 Data from 1970’s
JLab counts! (s1/2>2.5) Hall A, Zhu et alPhys. Rev. C 71, 044603 (2005)
More opportunities to check scaling JLab range of s 11 - 21 GeV2
Challenges to 8 Kroll
N N Puzzle • Why does constituent counting work so well for N→ N , but NOT for N → N ? • Kinematics are similar-another graph? s-8
Modern Interest? • AdS/CFT correspondence provides a set of solvable, non-perturbative field theories • scale (conformal) invariant • High momentum transfer exclusive reactions obey constituent counting rules. There are NO partons, Polchinski and Strassler • Conformal dimension plays role of nH • Theorists playground- learn how to calculate • Renewed interest in constituent counting • If constituent counting ruled out at high s,t –these insights are not valid 50 million high-energy theorists wrong
Summary of Constituent Counting • Constituent counting is important • Relates to AdS/CFT • When occurring, provides a tool (see below) • puzzle –pion photoproduction vs RCS
Real Compton Scattering RCS • p elastic scattering • simplest process? • many diagrams –samples below Handbag pQCD
RCS > reaction physics-GPDs DVCS RCS GPD DIS –parton dist Elastic Form Factor
RCS > reaction physics-GPDs RCS GPD DIS –parton dist Elastic Form Factor Pretty much all =0
Danagoulian et al Hall A • d/dt ~1/s8.0 +/- 0.02 constituent counting: 1/s6 Solid Handbag –Kroll Dashed Handbag -Miller \ wave function, transverse quark momentum constituent quark mass
Hamilton et al Hall A CQM- Miller GPD-Huang, Kroll Morii Regge –Cano Laget ASY, COZ- pQCD- Brooks Dixon with different dist. amps
KLL is not ALL =ALL (Kroll) non-vanishing constituent quark mass causes KLL≠ALL
Summary of RCS • RCS has direct connection to DIS and elastic form factors • Constituent counting not reached yet • KLL≠ ALL a new test of models
Constituent counting and the hadron-quark transition • Remainder of talk • Assume constituent counting holds at high enough s, -t (50 million high energy theorists can’t be wrong) • Quark degrees of freedom dominate • How to exploit
Hadron-Quark Transition N πN high -t low -t () N N high -t t=2/m2 Hadronic regime has long lived N N How to see go away?
N → N Transparency vs. A, =10GeV /A /A /A =10 GeV =5 GeV = 5 GeV -(t-t0) GeV2 -(t-t0) GeV2
N N nuclear RCS to understand puzzle in nuclei, A dependence ? Not proportional to A
Can use (A, t) - dependence of quasielastic N → N, to find Hadron-Quark Transition use N → N Summary of High –t exclusive in nuclei
Constituent Counting and Exotics production at large s, angle Exotic meson X: nX=n +1 (or 2) ntot= 9,10 High s, angle ratio: N→ N, ntot=9
Summary of summaries • Constituent counting CC is important • Relates to AdS/CFT • When occurring, provides a tool • RCS DIS, elastic form factors • Constituent counting not yet reached in RCS • KLL≠ ALL new test of models in RCS • Can use (A, t) - dependence of quasielastic N → N, to find Hadron-Quark Transition, understand RCS • Can use CC to find or verify exotics