1 / 11

Progress in D 0 K s K + K - and Dº  K s K analysis Results from an exercise Dalitz fit for D +  K + K - 

Progress in D 0 K s K + K - and Dº  K s K analysis Results from an exercise Dalitz fit for D +  K + K -  + D 0 K s K + K - Dalitz plot Detached sample, no tagging 2900 runs (Each point is doubly entered) f(1020) D 0 K s K + K - Dalitz plot, tagged sample

jana
Download Presentation

Progress in D 0 K s K + K - and Dº  K s K analysis Results from an exercise Dalitz fit for D +  K + K - 

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Progress in D0Ks K+ K- and Dº Ks K analysis • Results from an exercise Dalitz fit for D+ K+K- + Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  2. D0Ks K+ K- Dalitz plot • Detached sample, no tagging • 2900 runs (Each point is doubly entered) f(1020) Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  3. D0Ks K+ K- Dalitz plot, tagged sample D*++D0  K0barK+ K- Look for resonances in either K+ K- or K0bar K+ and vice versa. Detached sample with the D* tagging. Determine the strangeness of the Ks by tagging the charm of the D0 Decay trees for this D0 decay mode, showing some possible resonances which couple u and d quarks to s quarks: a0(980) a0(980)? f0(980)? f0(980) f(1020)? f(1020) Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  4. f0(980) simulation from Rodney Green’s thesis. y axis is M2(K-pi+) and x axis is M2(K- K+). How is a0+ (980) simulated in MCFocus? • Simulated the following decay and its c.c. • D*+ D0p+ • a0+ (980) K- •  Ks K+ •  p+ p - • The Dalitz plot is populated according to a0+ (980) decay. Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  5. Revisit DºKs K with higher statistics Recall we fit four signal yields to a function of 3 variables + + • N = total yield •  = Charm-anti-Charm asymmetry (fragmentation dynamics) + The ² of this fit of 3 parameters with 4 dof is a test of hypothesis that CP is conserved which model is based on. Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  6. Example of the fit with higher statistics obs pred N 21.1 25.4 D*+K+ N 61.0 56.5 D*+K- N 35.1 40.1 D*-K+ N 26.7 18.0 D*-K- D0K+ D0K- obs pred N 136 136 D*+K+ N 330 330 D*+K- D0BarK- N 320 320 D0BarK+ D*-K+ ² =0.0011 for 1 dof CL=99% N 132 132 D*-K- Detached sample (no out of target cut): N=140 =0.17 fK+=.31 (too Low!) • This was in October ² =3.13 for 1 dof CL=7.71% What’s up with the widths?! N=919 =0.015 fK+=.292 (lower!) • This is NOW Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  7. Summary • We have looked at D0Ks K+ K- Dalitz plot with 2900 runs • D* tagging virtually eliminates the background • There is a clear indication of f(1020) resonance as well as some indications of both f0(980) and a0(980) resonances. • It appears that MCFocus simulates a0(980) with the correct matrix element • We are in the process of learning how to fit for a0(980) • We repeated our CPV studies of DºKs K with higher statistics • A significant improvement in ² • The charm anti-charm asymmetry is around =0.015; more reasonable compared to =0.17 • We are seeing fK+=0.292 (+/- 0.023), the PDG value is fK+= 0.439 (+/- 0.1) Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  8. D+ K+K- + sample (provided by JEW): • We pick a “dirty” sample for this study • First we do do a log likelihood fit to the combined sample from low and high side bands; this is our background fit • Then we do a log likelihood fit to the signal region • The asymmetry in K*(890) lobes in signal suggests interference with K*(1430) A practice Dalitz fit with D+ K+K- + f(1020) No Zemach nodes K*(1430) f(1020) K*(890) high s.b. Low s.b. signal K*(890) No Zemach nodes Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  9. Likelihood profiles for the combined low and side bands D+ K+K- +background fit • For the background fit intensity function we pick two Breit-Wigners for f and K*(890) and a flat background • We fit for f and K*(890) amplitudes, fixing the flat background at unity f K*(890) Low side band overlays of data and the background intensity function(the fit quality with the high side band is similar to this): K*(890) f K+  + K-  + K-K+ Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  10. We fix the parameters in the background probability density function to the values we obtained from our fit to the background. • For the signal region we pick • three Breit-Wigners for f, K*(890) and K*(1430) • Zemach factors for f and K*(890) • two complex phases and two amplitudes. • Do a log likelihood fit to the signal probability density function Clean sample D+ K+K- +signal fit f K*(1430) Log likelihood profiles: phase The results match the likelihood profiles that we obtain using a clean D+ K+K- + sample in which we do not fit for the background (the arrows indicate the clean sample minimums) Amp. Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

  11. D+ K+K- + Dalitz projections • Putting it all together, we overlay the Dalitz squared mass projections of the combined probability density function and the data • The overlays match reasonably well f lobes K*(890) f lobes f K*(890) lobes K-  + K-K+ K+  + Amir Rahimi/FOCUS

More Related