100 likes | 257 Views
Biomedical HIV Prevention strategies. Wim Vandevelde European AIDS Treatment Group (EATG) European Community Advisory Board (ECAB) Conference on HIV Infection among Hidden Groups (MSM and CSW) IHMT/UNL, March 28 th 2011, Lisboa. EATG Mission.
E N D
Biomedical HIV Prevention strategies WimVandevelde European AIDS Treatment Group (EATG) EuropeanCommunityAdvisoryBoard (ECAB) Conference on HIV Infection among Hidden Groups (MSM and CSW) IHMT/UNL, March 28th 2011, Lisboa
EATG Mission • to achieve the fastest possible access to state-of-the-art medical products, devices and diagnostic tests, which prevent or treat HIV infection, or improve the quality of life of people living with HIV.
ECAB objectives • advise the research community on the needs of the local community and the appropriateness of proposed HIV research • advise the PLHIV community on the aims and expectations of research proposals and the appropriateness of the research
Biomedical HIV prevention strategies • Vaccines • Oral PrEPand PEP • ARV-based topical vaginal and rectal microbicides • Treatment as Prevention
Effective prevention strategies for MSM and CSW are • comprehensive and complementary • evidence-based • based on Human Rights principles • without moralistic or judgmental attitudes • designed to include and empower target populations • community-based and peer-to-peer
HIV Vaccine • potentially the ideal “magic bullet” for prevention • challenges for uptake/access for adequate population coverage • unlikely 100% effective => complementary tool • Merck STEP trial • Thailand study with ALVAC/AIDSVAX combination
Microbicides • antimicrobial agents unsuccessful so far (eg. Nonoxynal-9) • promising ARV-based topical vaginal/rectal microbicides • CAPRISA 004 study in South Africa (vaginal gel, TDF) • CROI 2011: MTN 006 study (rectal gel, TDF) • challenges: adherence requirements, drug resistance?, less than 100% efficacy • great potential for MSM and CSW
ARV treatment as prevention • suppressed viral load => reduced infectiousness • ART = effective component of a multilevel prevention effort • adherence is critical • lower vigilance for protective behaviors? • barriers to access for hard-to-reach populations
Pre- and Post-Exposture Prophylaxis • PEP: occupational AND non-occupational • Long-term side effects and resistance? • PrEP with TDF/FTC, maraviroc, raltegravir, … • PrEP target populations? High-risk MSM? • iPrEx study with TDF/FTC (MSM): 44%-90% effective • Who will pay/reimburse for PrEP? Differential pricing? • PEP does not necessarily lead to an increase in high-risk behavior
Acknowledgements • Mary Jane Rotheram-Borus, Dallas Swendeman(Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California) • Gary Chovnick(Department of Health Services, School of Public Health, University of California) • LuísMendão (EATG/GAT) ThankYou! wim@eatg.orgwww.eatg.org