1 / 22

1. Introduction

2 Mar 2005, New trend WS. Evolution of CO molecule on dusts in dense core : formation of H 2 CO and CH 3 OH. Naoki Watanabe. Colleagues: A. Nagaoka, T. Shiraki, H. Hidaka, A. Kouchi. Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido Univ. 1. Introduction. 2. Experimental.

janice
Download Presentation

1. Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2 Mar 2005, New trend WS Evolution of CO molecule on dusts in dense core : formation of H2CO and CH3OH Naoki Watanabe Colleagues: A. Nagaoka, T. Shiraki, H. Hidaka, A. Kouchi Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido Univ. 1. Introduction 2. Experimental 3. Formation of H2CO & CH3OH 4. Deuterium fractionation in CH3OH by the surface reactions 1/22

  2. Ice mantle ~10K (H2O, CO2, CO,…) Gas phase reactions silicate core Surface (solid phase) reactions on dusts 0.1~1mm ・ mainly, ion-molecule reactions necessary for H2, H2O, organic molecules and the formation of ice mantle ・ reaction network models Evolution of molecules in a molecular cloud Molecular cloud ・ Many species ＞120 ・ Ice dusts : ~10-9 cm-3 ・ 10 K < T ? Well studied ! 2/22

  3. Infrared absorption spectra of ice dust (ISO observation) Silicate 102 CH4 H2O OCS 13CO2 Silicate CO2 101 -CH3 CO Flux (Jy) CH3OH XCN Acrobat•¶‘ 100 CO2 W33A H2O 10-1 20 10 5 3 l (mm) 3/22

  4. E l i a s 2 9 W 3 3 A N G C 7 5 3 8 E l i a s 1 6 M o l e c u l e s l o w h i g h I R S 9 / h i g h f i e l d H O 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 2 C O 9 1 6 5 . 6 2 5 C O 1 4 2 0 2 2 1 5 2 H C O 1.7-7 5 2 C H O H 2 2 5 < 4 < 3 . 4 3 C H 2 2 < 1 . 6 4 N H 1 5 1 3 < 9 . 2 < 6 3 Main components in an ice mantle (Ehrenfruend & Charnley 2000) 4/22

  5. ・　Photolysis H2O(s) + hn → H + OH OH + CO(s) → CO2 + H ・　Cosmic-ray induced reaction H H2O(s) + p → H + OH H + O → OH → H2O OH + CO(s) → CO2 + H ・　Surface reaction of atoms（H, C, O) H + H → H2 on the surfaces fH~105 > fuv~103 cm2/s in dense core Surface (Solid-phase) reactions on ice dusts 5/22

  6. H H H H CO → HCO → H2CO → CH3O → CH3OH Formation of H2CO and CH3OH on dusts Photolysis of the ice mantle CO(s) + H2O(s) + hv (or ion ) →CO + H + OH　→　HCO + OH Inefficient → H2CO ・・・ → CH3OH Successive hydrogenation of CO on the surface ? Eb : 2000 ~ 3000 K >> surface temperature 6/22

  7. ・　Do reactions proceed at the temperature around 10 K ? H H H H CO → HCO → H2CO → CH3O → CH3OH Try ! ☆H + CO-H2O mixed ice :10~20 K H CO H2O ice Aim If those proceed, gain more information ・ Reaction rate, reverse process, … ・　Dependence of reaction rates on ice temperature & composition. 7/22

  8. CO, H2O gas Al substrate ~10K Measuring the IR absorption spectra of ice H Measuring the spectra during H exposure Experimental H Al substrate (10K~) port for H-atom measurements Base pressure: 2×10-10 Torr Sample temp.：8 ~ 20K Sample thickness：<30 ML 8/22

  9. ・ IR absorption spectrum for the initial sample (nonexposed) ～ ～ Å O/CO 4, 100 10K, H 2 0.06 0.04 Absorbance CO 0.02 H O H O 2 2 0.00 4000 3000 2000 1000 Wavenumber (cm-1) 9/22

  10. What’s found H C O 2 t = 1 m i n 1. H2 does not react H C O 2 e c C H O H t = 6 m i n n C O 3 a b r o s b A H H H H t = 4 0 m i n D CO →HCO→ H2CO→CH3O→CH3OH (4) (3) (2) (1) H O 2 0 . 0 0 5 k(1) << k(2), k(3) << k(4) Eb(1), (3) : 2200 ~ 2600 K (Woon, 2002) 1 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 - 1 W a v e n u m b e r ( c m ) These are tunneling reaction ・ Variation of the IR absorption spectrum of ice after the H exposure 15 K increase 2. CO → H2CO → CH3OH decrease 3. HCO, CH3O not observed 10/22

  11. ・ Ice temperature dependence of reactions 0 1 2 3 4 5 0.00 CO 10 K 15 K 20 K -0.05 -0.10 -0.15 feature of tunneling reaction 0.15 (CO) H CO 2 0 0.10 (X) / N 0.05 t transition stage between thermal and tunneling reactions N 0.00 0.15 CH OH 3 0.10 0.05 may be due to drop of sticking probability of H atoms at 20 K 0.00 0 20 40 60 80 Exposure Time (min) H fluence (1018 cm-2) 10cm -3, 10 K, 105 yr Features ・ rates of CO decrease and H2CO increase are almost the same between 10 and 15 K ・ rates of CH3OH increase and yield at 10 K < those at 15 K ・ All rates at 20 K are very slow 11/22

  12. Arrhenius + Tunneling H2CO → CH3OH Arrhenius plot for the tunneling reaction Slope：activation energy Arrhenius log k CO →H2CO 15K 10K T-1 12/22

  13. 100 20K, 100Å 10 10K, 100Å NGC7538 Halley H2CO / CH3OH 15K, 100Å GL2136 1 Hale-Bopp W33A 20Å Hyakutake 0.1 Orion hot core GL7009S 10Å 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 1000 CO / CH3OH Observations vs. Experiments Experimental fluences = those for 106 yr in MC 13/22

  14. ・　The CO hydrogenation proceeds efficiently under the condition of MC H H H H CO → HCO → H2CO → CH3O → CH3OH (4) (3) (1) (2) Summary 1 ・ These are tunneling reactions ・　k(1) << k(2), k(3) << k(4) ・　Reactivity strongly depends on the temperature of the surface. 14/22

  15. ［D］/［H］ ratio in methanol CD3OH /CH3OH CH3OD /CH3OH CH2DOH /CH3OH CHD2OH /CH3OH Molecular cloud (IRAS16293) 0.01 0.06 0.3 0.02 Comets <0.008 <0.03 Interstellar atomic D/H ratio ～ 1.6 × 10-5(Linsky et al. 1995) 15/22

  16. H3+ + HD H2D+ + H2 ? ×multi-deuterated methanol Models for the deuterium fractionation in methanol Gas phase models HD/H2~10-5 (initial condition: cosmic ratio） H2D+/H3+ >> HD/H2 ~10-5 producing methanol-d in gas phase Gas - dusts models H2D+ + e → H2 + D D / H atom ~ 0.1 >> HD/H2 after 104 yr methanol-d D + CO on a surface 16/22

  17. H D H D e. g., CO → HCO → HDCO → CHD2O → CHD2OH D D e. g., CH3OH → CH2DOH → CHD2OH H H Try ! CH3OH + D atom Deuterium fractionation in methanol by surface reactions Process 1. (previous models) Successive H and D addition to CO Slow ? … D ≧ H addition required Process 2. (our idea) H-D substitution in methanol after the formation of CH3OH 17/22

  18. H-D substitution (process 2) proceeds ! CH3OH + D → dn-methanol but dn-methanol + H → CH3OH not observed ! D + CH3OH at 10 K CO-stretch Initial absorbance of CH3OH OH-stretch Absorbance CH3-deformation dn-CH3OH 150-min exposure to D increase D Absorbance decrease 18/22

  19. Process 1 (successive D and H addition) V.S. Process 2 (H-D substitution in methanol) Which is dominant in MC ? Try H and D atom + solid CO ! in which the two processes compete. 19/22

  20. initial sample Results H + D + CO at 10 K 0.005 （D/H=0.1) after exposure 20/22

  21. 106 yr × Variation of CO, CH3OH and CH3OH-d Successive addition e. g., CO → HCO → HDCO → CHD2O → CHD2OH CO → DCO → D2CO → CD3O → CD3OH H-D substitution e. g., CH3OH → CH2DOH → CHD2OH 21/22

  22. Summary 2 ・　H - D substitution reaction in solid methanol is key process for the deuterium enrichment ! Future work ・ Which is dominant ? H abstraction & D addition d3 - CH3O d2 - CH3O CH3O d1 - CH3O -H -H -H -H +D +D +D +D d4- CH3OH d3 - CH3OH d1 - CH3OH d2 - CH3OH CH3OH H-D direct exchange Observed isotopomer 22/22

More Related