70 likes | 268 Views
Million Node GENI / Seattle Spiral 2 Year-end Project Review. University of Washington PI:Thomas Anderson Co-PI: Justin Cappos
E N D
Million Node GENI / SeattleSpiral 2 Year-end Project Review University of Washington PI:Thomas Anderson Co-PI: Justin Cappos Staff: Monzur Muhammad, Justin SamuelStudents: Evan Meagher, Armon Dadgar, Jeff Rasley, Danny Huang, Alan Loh, Mick Ayzenburg, Sebastian Morgan, Timothy Vega, Cosmin Barsan, Eric Kimbrel, Zachary Boka, Conrad Meyer, Stephen Sievers, Yafete Yemuru, Jason Chen, Yoon Sung Hong, Jenn Hanson, Ivan Beschastnikh August 27th, 2010
Project Summary • Peer-to-peer testbed • About 1K nodes online at a time • NAT / mobile nodes / phones • Reasonable toolset • Use types / stats • Active classroom use (12 classes + more coming) • Researcher use starting to pick up • WaterKeepers (University of Victoria, Canada) • TOOT (University of Vienna, Austria) • End host mobility (Williams College / U Mass) • Developer interest • Understanding and evading content restrictions
Accomplishments 1: Advancing GENI Spiral 2 Goals • Continuous Experimentation • Educational and Research Use • Integration • Integration into ProtoGENI • Accept ProtoGENI credentials for SeattleGENI resource acquisition • Use DOR facility for node / service coordination • Instrumentation and Measurement • Owl integration • Interoperability • Run on PlanetLab, ProtoGENI, DOME, GpENI, etc. • Identity Management • Accept ProtoGENI credentials
Accomplishments 2:Other Project Accomplishments • CCS publication on Seattle's security model • SSV paper on portability within the testbed • Taught a 1 week GENI class at U Vienna • Held two Seattle workshops co-located with Educational conferences, one workshop co-located with GEC 8, + lots of presentations at diverse venues. • Supervised 3 honor's theses, supported about 12 undergrads (many with course credit)
Issues Is O&M going to ask us for anything? When will the identity management credentials / libs be finalized?
Plans • What are you plans for the remainder of Spiral 2? • Deliver clearinghouse • Cooperate with O&M team (???) • Identity management (???) • The GPO is starting to formulate goals for Spiral 3. What are your thoughts regarding potential Spiral 3 work? • Continuous experimentation could use more focus (mission not accomplished) • Outreach is a good way to do this • Identity management is important, but not critical • Integration of Control Frameworks doesn't seem worth the effort