1 / 37

Measuring Success Using Performance Measurement

Measuring Success Using Performance Measurement. NAEH Conference on Ending Family Homelessness. Michelle Abbenante Brooke Spellman February 8, 2008. What is Performance Measurement?.

jared
Download Presentation

Measuring Success Using Performance Measurement

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Measuring Success Using Performance Measurement NAEH Conference on Ending Family Homelessness Michelle Abbenante Brooke Spellman February 8, 2008

  2. What is Performance Measurement? Performance measurement is a process that systematically evaluates whether your efforts are making an impacton the clients you are serving or the problem you are targeting. 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  3. 1. Program Level Program Funding Report, such as HUD APR Local Service Provider Ten-Year Plan Report Card or CoC Application CoC 2. CoC/System Level Multiple Levels of Performance Measurement State-wide Report or Performance Measurement Tool 3. State Level NAEH Assessment of National Progress or Federal GRPA and PART Reviews 4. National Level 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  4. Why Should Programs be Interested in Performance Measurement? We are all in the business of helping people, which means we need to… • …understand whether current activities are working to achieve intended results. • …drive program improvement and share information on effective practices with others. • …acknowledge that high-performing programs are more likely to receive funding through competitive funding processes. 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  5. Building Blocks of Performance Measurement • Inputs include resources dedicated to, or consumed by, the program—e.g., money, staff and staff time, volunteers and volunteer time, facilities, equipment and supplies. • Activities are what the program does with the inputs to fulfill its mission, such as providing shelter, feeding the homeless, or providing job training. • Outputs are the direct products of program activities. They usually are presented in terms of the volume of work accomplished—e.g., number of participants served and the number of service engagements. • Outcomes are benefits or changes among clients during or after participating in program activities. Outcomes may relate to change in client knowledge, attitudes, values, skills, behaviors, conditions, or other attributes. 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  6. Activities Outreach Shelters Case Management Rent Subsidies & Services Inputs Outputs $ (CoC and Other) Programs Infrastructure Staff # Clients Served by Program Service Linkages New PSH Units/Subsidies Vacancy Statistics Outcomes 30% exited to PH 40% increased income 25% reduction in CH 25% shorter LOS < recidivism Performance Measurement Process Should we adjust how we spend our resources? How do we document our efforts? Should we add or change use of resources to expand our impact? What did our efforts achieve? 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  7. Whereas, an outcome is: Be mindful to distinguish between outputs and outcomes. Outputs vs. Outcomes • An output is: • Focused on what the program will do to achieve the outcome. • Focused on what the participant will gain from the program. • A way to quantify the frequency and intensity of the activity. • A way to measure the client-level impact with clear targets and methods for measuring change. • Specific to the activity described for the program. • Attributable (a result of) to that program. • Meaningful and attainable. • Feasible and attainable. If outcomes show the program works… outputs are needed to understand how to replicate results 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  8. Group Exercise:Outcome, Output, or Neither? Answers • 150 clients received prevention counseling and one-time financial assistance. • 90% of persons will obtain employment by completion of program. • 75% of program staff will be trained in crisis management techniques. • Met 40% (50) of Permanent Supportive Housing goal. • 65% of clients with chronic medical condition will improve physical health Examples Output Outcome Activity Output Outcome 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  9. Achieving Your Outcomes • Short-term outcomes: What change will the client experience within a month of his/her involvement in the program? How will you measure this? • Intermediate outcomes: What change will the client experience within a year of being involved in the program? How will you measure this? • Long-term outcomes: What is the long-term (e.g., 3-year) impact of the program on clients? Has it been sustained? How will it be measured? Achieving your outcomes can be a progression. Monitoring this progression requires data that are collected at different intervals: 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  10. Long-term Short-term Example: Employment Program’s Impact Over Time 39% of participants (75% of those who get a job) will retain their jobs for > 12 months. All of those who get a job (~52 clients) will receive weekly check-up calls and job counseling, as needed. All of those who complete the training classes (~95 clients) will be referred to jobs and receive job placement counseling. 52% of participants (55% of those who complete the job training class) will obtain full-time employment 93% of participants (97% of people who completed the job training class) will show improved job skills ~95 participants will complete job training classes. 100 people expected to participate in the program annually 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  11. Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 What do you hope to achieve with this population? Within the base, how many persons achieved it? Who is the base for measuring results? Step 4 Within the base, how many persons achieved it? Outcome (%) Who is the base population for measuring results? Framework for Converting Program Goals into Outcomes • How do I convert program goals into measurable outcomes? • What do I need to calculate the outcomes? 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  12. Step 4 20 40 Converting Program Goals into Outcomes: Example Program Goal: Supporting participants in stable housing at least 6 months Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 20 people are still in stable housing (6+mo) or exited after being in housing for 6+ mo Base= Persons who have been enrolled > 6 mo or have exited (n=40 people) Goal: remain housed > 6 mo 50% remain in stable housing at least 6 months 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  13. Look Out for Ambiguous Concepts • …obtaining stable housing? • …obtaining employment? • …increasing income? • …accessing services? • …becoming more self-sufficient? Developing and measuring performance outcomes often invites ambiguous concepts into the process. For example, what do we mean by… Which data elements and responses will count? 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  14. HMIS Data Elements Are the Building Blocks of Performance Measurement 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  15. Wherever Possible Use HMIS to Define Your Concepts • Emergency shelter Based on the Destination HMIS data element, we can define stable housing (narrowly) using the following response categories: • Apartment or house that you own • Transitional housing • Staying/living with family • Permanent housing • Staying/living with friends • Substance abuse facility or detox center • Hotel or motel voucher paid for without ES voucher • Hospital (non-psychiatric) • Foster care home or group home • Jail, prison or juvenile detention center • Place not meant for human habitation • Room, apartment, or house that you rent • Other • Don’t Know • Refused 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  16. Group Exercise Employment Program The goals of the program are to help unemployed clients obtain employment and help employed clients get “better” jobs. During the past year, the program served 6 (unduplicated) persons: 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  17. Define the Base Population for Each Goal Is everyone part of the target population?E.g., Do you expect to calculate an outcome for everyone? Goal 1: Achieve employment at exit Goal 2: Obtain “better” employment at exit 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  18. Step 4 2 3 Calculate the Outcome for Goal 1 Program Goal 1: Obtain Employment at Exit Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 All unemployed persons at entry who exited (N= 3) Achieve employment 2 persons achieved employment 67% achieved employment 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  19. Step 4 1 2 Calculate the Outcome for Goal 2 Program Goal 2: Improved Employment at Exit Step 3 Step 2 Step 1 Persons who were employed at entry and exited (N= 2) Improve employment 1 person increased earnings 50% gained better employment 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  20. Inputs Money: $250,000 Staff: 4 FTEs 1 Facility Outcomes 67% achieved empl. 50% improved empl. Exercise 2 and the Performance Measurement Process Activities Job Training Classes Interview Assistance Job Placement Services Outputs 6 enrolled in weekly services 6 employment assessments Referred to av. 4jobs each 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  21. Step 4 Step 1 Step 2 Step 3 Review outcomes with program managers Develop action steps and timelines Regular monitoring Implement action steps Using Outcomes to Inform Future Program Operations 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  22. Step 1: Reviewing Outcomes with Managers • Program director and managers should review outcomes collaboratively to understand what the outcomes are suggesting. • Break down the outcomes to understand the underlying forces: What’s Going On? • What are we doing right? What activities contributed to our ability to meet/exceed our benchmarks? • Where do we need to improve? What activities fell short of producing the desired outcomes? • What else might be contributing to our outcomes? How can we influence or mitigate these external forces to further our positive outcomes? 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  23. Step 2: Developing Action Steps and Timelines • Outcomes that were achieved/exceeded: Continue to support the activities that led to our positive performance. • Outcomes that were not achieved: Allocate our inputs differently to support different types/levels of activities. • Set target dates for reviewing all outcomes—e.g., 3-month intervals. • Collaborate with other service providers to “control” the external impacts on the program. Reinforcing the Good and Adjusting the Bad 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  24. Step 3: Implementing the Action Steps • You can’t implement what you don’t understand: program directors, managers and front-line staff must understand the reasons for making changes in program operations. • Information sharing promotes the idea that “we are all in this together.” • Information sharing is fluid: program directors, managers and front-line staff can learn from one another; it’s not a one-way (top-down) process. Getting Buy-In Through Information Sharing 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  25. Step 4: Regular Monitoring • Monitor your progress by generating your performance outcomes at different periods of time—e.g., 3-month intervals. • Adjust your approach as needed, but usually incrementally. • Important to acknowledge that clients’ needs may shift, and thus program goals and approach may also need to shift. It’s Easier to Adjust Program Operations Incrementally than Wholesale 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  26. Comparing Program Results • You can compare results from one program to another to see which programs are working best and which are working least well • With limited dollars, you want to fund the programs that are most effective. • You can use program results to identify best practice programs and those that need TA • You can use results from multiple programs to help set a community expectation or standard of performance 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  27. Case Study: How Washington, D.C. Uses Program Results • Outputs/Efficiency Measures • Clients Served • Chronically Homeless Served • Occupancy: the rate at which program was used • Interim Outcome Measures • Permanent Housing • Positive client destinations at exit (TH programs) • Retain clients for 6+ months (PSH programs) • Income: the amount of income or sources obtained • Self-Sufficiency: change in substance use, education, mental illness or employment • Measures apply differently to each program type and are supplemented with qualitative data for ranking purposes 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  28. Washington, DCFY 07 DHS Performance Measures *Self Sufficiency Temporary, Transitional and Permanent Supportive Housing Programs required to submit a Self Sufficiency Indicator will have to choose from Substance Abuse, Education, Mental Illness Assistance or Employment. 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  29. Apples to Apples: Risk Adjustment • Problem: Comparing program results can encourage programs to “cream” to ensure strong results • Solution: Risk adjustment allows you to account for differences in client populations when comparing results across programs Results can be adjusted on the basis of… • Client characteristics, such as demographics, family size, disability • Client history, such as past eviction, criminal background, • Client functionality or level of engagement/commitment to change 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  30. Risk Adjustment Requires Expertise • To adjust for client differences, programs need to collect consistent data on clients to use during analysis of program results • Agree on these standards beforehand • Develop an analysis plan for how you intend to adjust for client differences • Engage a researcher to help develop the plan • Even if you don’t formally adjust results, acknowledge that different programs may have different outcome expectations based on differences in clients targeted and/or served 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  31. CoC Outcome Results By Population All Clients (n=300) All Clients (n=100) 61% (61 clients) 23% (70 clients) Disabled Clients Disabled Clients Disabled Clients 12% (30 of 250 persons) 10% (1 of 10 persons) 12% (31 of 260 persons) Non-disabled Clients Non-disabled Clients Non-disabled Clients 67% (60 of 90 persons) 80% (40 of 50 persons) 71% (100 of 140 persons) Simplified Illustration of Dissecting Client Outcomes on Increased Earned Income Program A Program B By establishing targets, programs can be compared against CoC expectations in the future to determine if program performance is higher or lower than expected. 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  32. System Performance Measurement • Are your actions achieving your intended goals at the system level? • Does the system work? • If yes, what makes it work? • If no, what part doesn’t work, and how do you fix it to make it work? • Note that you may have system goals that only relate to certain types of clients or parts of the system (e.g., different goals for severely disabled persons) 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  33. Sample Impact Measures • Incidence of homelessness - Is homelessness declining? • Incidence of street or CH - Is street or chronic homelessness declining? • Length of stay in system, across all homeless programs - Do people stay homeless for shorter periods of time? • Prevention – Are fewer people experiencing homelessness for the first-time? • Rates of Recidivism – Are repeat occurrences of homelessness avoided or declining? Cross-tabulate results by core characteristics to understand if/how results vary for different subpopulations 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  34. Step 3 Step 1 Calculate LOS for each Stay De-duplicate clients across programs Step 2 Step 4 Create table with all Entry/Exit Dates by Client Consolidate sequential stays into single episode (gaps < 30 days = same episode) 114 Step 5 Calculate mean (168 days), low (81 days), high (309 days) Steps to Calculate System Length of Stay LOS 229281309 Entry Exit Date Date 5/8/06 5/30/076/1/07 9/01/07 3/1/07 5/21/07 2/1/06 12/7/06 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  35. Some notes of caution… • There is more to performance measurement than conducting the analysis • Educate, train, obtain buy-in • Be careful about how you interpret and use the data • Jump in, but don’t be careless in how you use the results • Look at the results within the context of all the outputs, interim measures and impact measures to validate the interpretation that’s being made • Vet the results before publicly releasing anything • Appropriately caveat the limitations of the data and analysis 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  36. Activities Adjust type and intensity of activities based on outcomes; track if improves Inputs Outputs Use program-level & system-wide results to adjust use of resources Document the level of effort provided Use to ensure activities delivered efficiently Outcomes Interim Outcomes signal client success; Impact outcomes track progress to goals Summary of System Performance Measurement 2008 NAEH Family Conference - Outcomes Workshop

  37. Questions? Contact us for more information or assistance: Michelle Abbenante, michelle_abbenante@abtassoc.com Brooke Spellman, brooke_spellman@abtassoc.com

More Related