1 / 23

Sextupole effect for MR (beam centroid beating)

Sextupole effect for MR (beam centroid beating). Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for MR-commissioning group September 20, 2005. MR Technical Design. COD after correction should be less than 1 mm. From the beam point of view it means that the deviation of the

jaron
Download Presentation

Sextupole effect for MR (beam centroid beating)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Sextupole effect for MR(beam centroid beating) Alexander Molodozhentsev KEK for MR-commissioning group September 20, 2005

  2. MR Technical Design COD after correction should be less than 1 mm. From the beam point of view it means that the deviation of the beam centroid (center of “mass”) from the machine center (0,0,s) should be less than 1 mm.

  3. Quadrupole field As ~ x·y Ax = Ay =0 Vector potential for the quadrupole field Single particle transverse kick from thin quadrupole x/s ~ x y/s ~ y Multi-particle transverse kick from thin quadrupole < x/s > ~ <x> = 0 < y/s > ~ < y > = 0 without COD

  4. Sextupole field (simplified model) As = 1/6 B// (x3 – 3xy2) Ax = Ay =0 Vector potential for the sextupole field Single particle transverse kick from thin sextupole x/s ~ (a x2 – b y2) y/s ~ y Multi-particle transverse kick from thin sextupole < x/s > ~ (a <x2> – b <y2>) ~ ( a x – b y ) < y/s > ~ < y > = 0 without COD

  5. Sextupole effect on the beam centroid E.Forest book “Beam Dynamics: …” (p.285) … sextupoles do move the average position of the beam. The part which does not depend on amplitude is the regular  2 dispersion. It is a non-dynamical effect. It is the change of the fixed point as a function of energy in a coasting beam normalization. The amplitude dependent terms are dynamical. A beam of finite size, on momentum (=0), appears shifted as if the fixed point moved. This effect of the sextupole field nonlinearity is the ‘leading’ order effect, then it could be observed by using the second-order matrix formalism.

  6. Sextupole effect on the beam centroid Estimation of the effect for MR (3GeV_Beam) for a single sextupole MR: <x> ~ 15 m, <x> ~ 1.5 m  = p/p =  0.004 x = y = 54  mm.mrad “Dispersion” term … ~ 72  10-6 “Amplitude Dependent” term (X) … ~ 784  10-6 “AD” term is much bigger than “D” term.

  7. Study approach … • MAD second order transfer matrix between the ring elements for MR lattice for the sextupole magnets (OFF / ON). • Teapot-type multi-particle tracker (ORBIT), based on the MAD transfer matrix. • NO space charge effects. • Observation of the first transverse moments (<X> & <Y>) around the ring. MR:: • Working point :: Qx = 22.428, Qy = 20.82 • Transverse particle distribution :: 3GeV … 54  mm.mrad (Parabolic, max=6) 40 GeV … 6  mm.mrad

  8. Test tracking #1 54  mm.mrad p/p = 0 NO CCSX <X> [mm] S [m] 10’000 mp

  9. Test tracking #2 54  mm.mrad p/p = 0 NO CCSX <X> [mm] S [m] 95’254 mp

  10. Test tracking #3_1 54  mm.mrad p/p = 0 NO CCSX <X> [mm] S [m] 250’000 mp

  11. Test tracking #3_2 54  mm.mrad p/p = 0 NO CCSX <Y> [mm] S [m] 250’000 mp

  12. Some conclusion…from Test Tracking • Oscillation of <X> and <Y> around the ring for the case without • CC_Sextupole_Magnets is caused by: • Statistical effect (limited number of macro particles) • Effect of the fringing field of the bending magnets (‘sextupole’- like • effect … will be explained later.

  13. Beam centroid motion around MR3 GeV x = 54 .mm.mrad (RCS-beam) p/p = 0 <x> [mm] S [m] 95254 macro_particles

  14. Beam centroid motion around MR y = 54 .mm.mrad (RCS-beam) p/p = 0 <y> [mm] S [m]

  15. Beam centroid motion around MR x = 54 .mm.mrad (RCS-beam) p/p = 0 <x> [mm] S [m] 50 turns

  16. Beam centroid motion around MR y = 54 .mm.mrad (RCS-beam) <y> [mm] S [m]

  17. Beam centroid motion around MR x = 54 .mm.mrad (RCS-beam)

  18. Beam centroid motion around MR40GeV x = 6 .mm.mrad (40GeV-beam) <x> [mm] S [m]

  19. Beam centroid motion around MR40GeV y = 6 .mm.mrad (40GeV-beam) <y> [mm] S [m]

  20. Conclusions: • Sextupole magnets, which are used for the chromaticity correction in MR, • lead to the beam centroid beating around the ring in the horizontal plane. • This is the ‘leading order’ effect of the sextupole field nonlinearity. At the injection energy of 3 GeV in the case of full linear chromaticity correction the maximum value of the beam centroid beating in the horizontal plane is about 2 mm (for the case without any COD). The maximum shift the the beam centroid for MR has been observed at the center of a half of the MR_Arc. The contribution of the dispersion part into the beam centroid beating for MR is negligible in comparison with the amplitude dependent terms.

  21. … to consider … possibility to correct (reduce) the beam centroid shift caused by the sextupole field nonlinearity for MR Possible solutions: … re-arrange the sextupole magnets (SDA) … look at the effect of bump-orbit at the locations where the beam centroid shift is maximum.

  22. MR: Dispersion_SuperPeriod

  23. MR: BetaXY_SuperPeriod

More Related