120 likes | 257 Views
Why New Approaches to Credit Risk Measurement and Management?. Why Now?. Structural Increase in Bankruptcy. Increase in probability of default High yield default rates: 5.1% (2000), 4.3% (1999, 1.9% (1998). Source: Fitch 3/19/01
E N D
Why New Approaches to Credit Risk Measurement and Management? Why Now?
Structural Increase in Bankruptcy • Increase in probability of default • High yield default rates: 5.1% (2000), 4.3% (1999, 1.9% (1998). Source: Fitch 3/19/01 • Historical Default Rates: 6.92% (3Q2001), 5.065% (2000), 4.147% (1999), 1998 (1.603%), 1997 (1.252%), 10.273% (1991), 10.14% (1990). Source: Altman • Increase in Loss Given Default (LGD) • First half of 2001 defaulted telecom junk bonds recovered average 12 cents per $1 ($0.25 in 1999-2000) • Only 9 AAA Firms in US: Merck, Bristol-Myers, Squibb, GE, Exxon Mobil, Berkshire Hathaway, AIG, J&J, Pfizer, UPS. Late 70s: 58 firms. Early 90s: 22 firms.
Disintermediation • Direct Access to Credit Markets • 20,000 US companies have access to US commercial paper market. • Junk Bonds, Private Placements. • “Winner’s Curse” – Banks make loans to borrowers without access to credit markets.
More Competitive Margins • Worsening of the risk-return tradeoff • Interest Margins (Spreads) have declined • Ex: Secondary Loan Market: Largest mutual funds investing in bank loans (Eaton Vance Prime Rate Reserves, Van Kampen Prime Rate Income, Franklin Floating Rate, MSDW Prime Income Trust): 5-year average returns 5.45% and 6/30/00-6/30/01 returns of only 2.67% • Average Quality of Loans have deteriorated • The loan mutual funds have written down loan value
The Growth of Off-Balance Sheet Derivatives • Total on-balance sheet assets for all US banks = $5 trillion (Dec. 2000) and for all Euro banks = $13 trillion. • Value of non-government debt & bond markets worldwide = $12 trillion. • Global Derivatives Markets > $84 trillion. • All derivatives have credit exposure. • Credit Derivatives.
Declining and Volatile Values of Collateral • Worldwide deflation in real asset prices. • Ex: Japan and Switzerland • Lending based on intangibles – ex. Enron.
Technology • Computer Information Technology • Models use Monte Carlo Simulations that are computationally intensive • Databases • Commercial Databases such as Loan Pricing Corporation • ISDA/IIF Survey: internal databases exist to measure credit risk on commercial, retail, mortgage loans. Not emerging market debt.
BIS Risk-Based Capital Requirements • BIS I: Introduced risk-based capital using 8% “one size fits all” capital charge. • Market Risk Amendment: Allowed internal models to measure VAR for tradable instruments & portfolio correlations – the “1 bad day in 100” standard. • Proposed New Capital Accord BIS II – Links capital charges to external credit ratings or internal model of credit risk. To be implemented in 2005.
Appendix 1.1A Brief Overview of Key VAR Concepts • Banks hold capital as a cushion against losses. What is the acceptable level of risk? • Losses = change in the asset’s value over a fixed credit horizon period (1 year) due to credit events. • Figure 1.1- normal loss distribution. Figure 1.2 – skewed loss distribution. Mean of distribution = expected losses (reserves). • Unexpected Losses (UL) = %tile VAR. Losses exceed UL with probability = %. • Definition of credit event: • Default Mode: only default • Mark-to-market: all credit upgrades, downgrades & default.