1 / 10

BSAC Annual Budget Analysis

BSAC Annual Budget Analysis. Three issues discussed: Current Budget Investments in the Future Future Budgets A couple of things before starting: “Big Issues” UB’s plans. Budget and Enrollment. Two components of our budget: State allocation--BAP Model discussion

jason
Download Presentation

BSAC Annual Budget Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BSAC Annual Budget Analysis • Three issues discussed: • Current Budget • Investments in the Future • Future Budgets • A couple of things before starting: • “Big Issues” • UB’s plans

  2. Budget and Enrollment • Two components of our budget: • State allocation--BAP Model discussion • Enrollment main driving force • Tuition revenues • Enrollments drive overall budget • UB initiative is an opportunity for BSC • BSC’s “distinctiveness” • 75% of courses <30 students; taught by “Scholars in the classroom”

  3. Enrollment Target • Historically targets determined by F&M • Driven by finances: more students = more $ • EM and “Capacity Model” • Early “runs” estimate about 10,800 (?). • Determining capacity? Example--economics • Enrollment target—a “big issue” • BSC’s potential…. • New strategic planning process; A goal: Become the best comprehensive college in SUNY and most diverse. • This of course will take resources—outlook?

  4. Next Year’s Budget • Depends on who wins E-target discussion. • SUNY Budget proposal is ambitious • 65% full-time faculty is goal • State budget situation • $4-5 billion deficit projected • Issue: How to become “best” (and increase faculty) without increasing enrollment? • If State finances SUNY request, no problem; if not, how can we generate more resources? • “Game the BAP model”

  5. Other Funding—Efficiencies? • Faculty issues • 50% are the doers • Differential teaching loads 2. Cutting the bureaucracy • I was there…it can be done. 3. We need Transparency in Budget Allocation Process and how priorities are set. • Difficulty getting data to analyze where $ goes?

  6. Budget Allocation: where’s the $ go? • VP Area2001/022005/06%Change • AA $35,274.50 $38,740.50 9.8% (9.3) • FM $13,597.70 $15,286.40 12.4 • SA $ 2,503.70 $ 2,614.70 4.4 • IA $ 992.50 $ 1,030.70 3.8 • Pres $ 744.20 $ 798.60 7.3 • Total $53,112.60 $58,470.90 10.1 (Actual budget) $67,190.1 • Notes: • Budget allocations by vp area, not tot budget • Reorganization in 2006/07 (CIO) • Strategic Planning moved from Pres to AA

  7. Share of total allocation • VP Area2001/022005/06 • AA 66.4% 65.9% (-.5) • FM 25.6 26.1 (+.5) • SA 4.7 4.5 • IA 1.9 1.8 • Pres 1.41.8 100 100 • Note: Strategic Planning moved.

  8. Past two years • VP Area2006/072007/08%Change • AA $34,370.00 $38,350.90 11.6% • FM $12,664.40 $14,005.30 10.6 • IT $ 7,024.50 $ 7,190.80 2.4 • SA $ 5,983.9 $ 6,166.10 3.0 • IA $ 1,201.5 $ 1,540.6 28.2 • Pres $ 840.50 $ 876.90 4.3 • Total $62,084.80 $68,130.40 9.7 • Tot Bud $76,373.2 $80,191.40 5.0 • Note: State proportion 45% of total this year.

  9. Budget Priorities • How are priorities set? • Budget Priorities Task Force • Last year • This year • Strategic Planning Process • Put some meat in SP process. • Goal of 65% F-T fac. • How many over next 5 years? Cost? How to finance?

  10. Conclusion • UB’s plan gives us a chance to define who we are. • Senate needs to be involved in these “big issues.” (Enrollment target/Goal to be best!) • 17.5 more years…

More Related