640 likes | 652 Views
This research outlines the development of accurate and robust code for axisymmetric calculations in general relativity, focusing on black hole simulations and gravitational wave collapse. It discusses the formalism, equations of motion, numerical considerations, early results, and future work in this field. The long-term goals include studying critical phenomena, testing stability of spherical solutions, exploring new solutions with novel matter sources, and investigating the effects of rotation. The text highlights techniques and algorithms for general use, previous works in the field, and challenges in achieving axisymmetric simulations, along with strategies for boundary and initial data conditions, numerical approaches, evolution schemes, regularization, and dissipation methods.
E N D
A New Code for Axisymmetric Numerical Relativity Eric Hircshmann, BYU Steve Liebling, LIU Frans Pretorius, UBC Matthew Choptuik CIAR/UBC Black Holes III Kananaskis, Alberta May 22, 2001
Outline • Motivation • Previous Work (other axisymmetric codes) • Formalism & equations of motion • Numerical considerations • Early results • Black hole excision results • Adaptive mesh refinement results • Future work
Motivation • Construct accurate, robust code for axisymmetric calculations in GR • Full 3D calculations still require more computer resources than typically available (especially in Canada!) • Interesting calculations to be done!
Long Term Goals • Critical Phenomena • Test non-linear stability of known spherical solutions • Look for new solutions with new matter sources • Study effects of rotation • Repeat Abrahams & Evans gravitational-wave collapse calculations with higher resolution
Long Term Goals • Cosmic Censorship • Reexamine Shapiro & Teukolsky computations suggesting naked singularity formation in highly prolate collapse but using matter with better convergence properties • ??? (“Expect the Unexpected”)
Development of Techniques & Algorithms for General Use • Coordinate choices (lapse and shift) • Black hole excision techniques • Adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) algorithms
Previous Work (“Space + Time” Approaches) • NCSA / Wash U / Potsdam … (Smarr & Eppley (1978), Hobill, Seidel, Bernstein, Brandt …) • Focused on head-on black hole collisions using “boundary conforming” (Cadez) coordinates • Culminates in work by Brandt & Anninos (98-99); head-on collisions of different-massed black holes, estimation of recoil due to gravity-wave emission
Previous Work • Nakamura & collaborators (early 80’s) • Rotating collapse of perfect fluid using (2+1)+1 approach • Stark & Piran (mid 80’s) • Rotating collapse of perfect fluid, relatively accurate determination of emitted gravitational wave-forms
Previous Work • Cornell Group (Shapiro,Teukolsky, Abrahams, Cook …) • Studied variety of problems in late 80’s through early 90’s using non-interacting particles as matter source • FOUND EVIDENCE FOR NAKED SINGULARITY FORMATION IN SUFFICIENTLY PROLATE COLLAPSE
Previous Work • Evans, (84-), Abrahams and Evans (-93) • Began as code for general relativistic hydrodynamics • Later specialized to vacuum collapse (Brill waves) • STUDIED CRITICAL COLLAPSE OF GRAVITATIONAL WAVES; FOUND EVIDENCE FOR SCALING & UNIVERSALITY (93)
Problems With Axisymmetry • Most codes used polar/spherical coordinates • Severe difficulties with regularity at coordinate singularities: , but especially -axis • Long-time evolutions difficult due to resulting instabilities • MAJOR MOTIVATION FOR SUSPENSION OF 2D STUDIES IN MID-90’s
Formalism • Adopt a (2+1)+1 decomposition; dimensional reduction --- divide out the action of the Killing vector (Geroch) • Gravitational degrees of freedom in 2+1 space • Scalar: • Twist vector: (ONE dynamical degree of freedom)
Formalism • Have not incorporated rotation yet (no twist vector); in this case easy to relate (2+1)+1 equations to “usual” 3+1 form • Adopt cylindrical coordinates • No dependence of any quantities on
Geometry • all functions of
Geometry • Coordinate conditions • Diagonal 2-metric • Maximal slicing • Kinematical variables: • Dynamical variables: Conjugate to
Matter • Single minimally coupled massless scalar field, • Also introduce conjugate variable
Evolution Scheme • Evolution equations for • “Constraint” equations for • Also have evolution equation for which is used at times • Compute and monitor ADM mass
Regularity Conditions • As , all functions either go as or • Regularity EXPLICITLY enforced
Boundary Conditions • Numerical domain is FINITE • Impose naïve outgoing radiation conditions on evolved variables, • Conditions based on asymptotic flatness and leading order behaviour used for “constrained” variables
Initial Data • Freely specify evolved quantities • Solve “constraints” for
Numerical Approach • Use uniform grid in • Grid includes • Use finite-difference formulae (mostly centred difference approximations)
Numerical Approach • Use “iterative Crank-Nicholson” to update evolved variables • Use multi-grid to solve coupled elliptic equations for , based on point-wise simultaneous relaxation of all four variables • Still have some problems with multi-grid in strong Brill collapse; using evolution equation for helps
Dissipation • Add explicit dissipation of “Kreiss-Oliger” form to differenced evolution equations • Scheme remains (second order), but high-frequency components are effectively damped • CRUCIAL for controlling instabilities, particularly along -axis
Kreiss-Oliger Dissipation: Example • Consider the simple “advection” equation • Finite difference via and
Kreiss-Oliger Dissipation: Example • Add “Kreiss-Oliger” dissipation via • Where and
Black Hole Excision • To avoid singularity within black hole, exclude interior of hole from computational domain (Unruh) • Operationally, track some surface(s) interior to apparent horizon(s) • Currently fix excision surface by scanning level contours of a priori specified function and choosing surface on which outgoing divergence of null rays is sufficiently negative