1 / 19

High P T Inclusive Jets Study

1. High P T Inclusive Jets Study. Manuk Zubin Mehta , Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March , 2009. 2. Introduction: Inclusive Jets

jatin
Download Presentation

High P T Inclusive Jets Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1 High PT Inclusive Jets Study Manuk Zubin Mehta , Prof. Manjit kaur Panjab University, Chandigarh India CMS Meeting March , 2009

  2. 2 Introduction: Inclusive Jets - On the MC side : They are available for QCD jet with leading order (LO) matrix element - In many tests of QCD requires to use NLO calculations - But the absence of generator programs for QCD jet production in next-to-leading order • Necessary to apply additional corrections to account for the effects of multiple parton interactions and the hadronisation process.

  3. 3 Herwig++ ,Herwig&Jimmy and Pythia6 (The process of hadronisation is not at all understood ,but there are several models that seem to give good approximation to what is occuring) Herwig and Pythia use different hadronisation model -Lund String Model in Pythia -Cluster Model in Herwig++ and Herwig&Jimmy And also having different Underlying events model (Underlying event is used to tune MC generators to data and measured in transverse region) - Tune D6T for Pythia6 - Herwig++ used with default settings - Herwig+Jimmy tuned that developed in the Atlas Collaboration. - All three are tuned to Tevatron data

  4. 4 Analysis Setup -Herwig++ 2.2,Pythia 6.4 in CMSSW_2_1_4 Herwig6+ jimmy in CMSSW_2_2_3 - Selection Criteria for Jets: pt > 50 Gev - Algorithm used : Incl kt ,D = 0.6 SisCone ,R = 0.7 - Centre of mass energy : 10 Tev - The Phase space sliced into 17 pthat bins. - Number of event : 1Million per bin (to reduce Statistical uncertainties )

  5. 5 cont.... - With this coverage of 50GeV to 4000GeV is achieved. - Binning in rapidity is used according to detector geometry :0.00<|y|<=0.55 , 0.55<|y|<=1.10 barrel region1.10<|y|<=1.70 transition region1.70<|y|<=2.50 endcap region2.50<|y|<=3.20 transition region3.20<|y|<=5.00 forward region

  6. 6 Comparison of Basic Observables Pythia Herwig+Jimmy Herwig++

  7. Number of Jets using three generators 7 • Herwig++ seems to gives a higher jet multiplicity . With k T D=0.6 With SisCone R= 0.7

  8. Inclusive Jet spectra from Herwig++,Herwig&Jimmy and Pythia6 8 • Private Production : 17 Million events in 17 pthat bins. • CTEQ6L PDF for Pythia and Herwig&Jimmy • MRST2001 PDF for Herwig++

  9. Comparision of inclusive jet crossection distribution 9 With k T D=0.6 These are weighted spectra of crossections in the • inner central barrel region • barrel endcaps • farward region • Only Slight differences in the forward region are observed. With SisCone R =0.7

  10. Ratio of Herwig++ and Herwig+Jimmy crossections w.r.t Pythia in inner barrel region (0.00 < |y| < 0.55) 10 With k T D=0.6 • Ratio for Herwig +Jimmy deviate slightly from one With SisCone R =0.7

  11. Ratio of Herwig++ and Herwig+Jimmy crossections w.r.t Pythia in barrel endcaps region ( 1.70 < |y| < 2.50) 11 With k T D=0.6 • Ratio exceeds one as rapidity increases. With SisCone R =0.7

  12. Ratio of Herwig++ and Herwig+Jimmy crossections w.r.t Pythia in forward region ( 3.20 < |y| < 5.00) 12 With k T D=0.6 With SisCone R =0.7

  13. Rapidity Distribution with k T D=0.6 Low pThat interval (80-120 GeV) Medium pThat interval (1000-1400 GeV)

  14. 14 Highest pThat interval (3500-4000 GeV) • The rapidity distribution for these intervals are found to be nearly identical for all generators. • The Plots for SisCone R =0.7 also match very well.

  15. 15 Further Plan: • Comparisons with simulated MC samples • Comparison of generators and their models allows estimation of systematic uncertainties. • Derive final hadronization+UE corrections including systematic uncertainties from the different  MC for inclusive jets and document this in analysis note ,we are preparing.

  16. Back Up Slides

  17. Hadronisation • PYTHIA(string model) • It assumes colour charged strings between the partons coming from the parton shower step. • As they move appart,the strings break and new quark antiquark pairs appear at the breaking points. • HERWIG(cluster model) • Thw colour neutral clusters are formed from neighbouring quarks,which then decay isotropically into hadrons. • To preserve energy conservation, a momentum transfer between the cluster is performed, If a cluster is lighter than the lightest hadron of the given quarks flavour

  18. Multiple Parton Interactions • Pythia and Herwig++ • Pythia and Herwig++ handle MPI by performing a number of minimum bias parton scatters above a certain threshold in transverse momentum exchange. • This threshold together with the chosen parton density function,defines a average number of additional interactions that take place in an event. • Other parameter include mattter distribution in the proton and variables that steer the amount of intial and final state radiation that is spread into the event. • Herwig+Jimmy • Herwig6 natively doesnot include MPI but only simple soft interaction model that is based on approach pioneered by UA5 experiment. • The lacking functionality however be completed by linking with JIMMY package that also inspired the model in Herwig++.

More Related