70 likes | 182 Views
WP4 – Evaluation Framework Summary. Peter Stefan WP4 leader SIM4RDM face-to-face meeting. WP4 Objective. Strongly coupled with WP2 and WP3. To create a framework that helps evaluating funding models from RDM point of view. Both national and international cases are covered. WP4 Parameters.
E N D
WP4 – Evaluation FrameworkSummary Peter Stefan WP4 leader SIM4RDM face-to-face meeting
WP4 Objective • Strongly coupled with WP2 and WP3. • To create a framework that helps evaluating funding models from RDM point of view. • Both national and international cases are covered.
WP4 Parameters • Tasks: • 4.1: interviews with SB & FA people, workshops; • 4.2: writing report on the model worked out (use cases, synthesized material); • Deliverable(s): • the report; • Schedule: • PM7-PM12; • April-September 2012 (vacation?);
Critical issue • To create intervention actions, evaluation procedures first the different funding schemes have to be understood. • How a call is typically created? • Hungary: • lobby; • strong follow up of Brussels directives; • financial return and sustainability.
Initial proposal on metrics, and evaluation criteria • Measure on legal framework: • data protection, the support level of e-Infrastructures, RDM in law; • Measure on organizational framework: • funding bodies, promoting organizations (incubating companies, NRENs); • Measure on user demand/interest/awareness: • clear communication about the initiative, communication channels, user responsiveness, user enthusiasm; • Measure on level of technical support: • RDM supported by infrastructure and tools, data storage, data protection, data access
WP4 Actions • to define the interfaces towards other WPs (Peter); • to make regular WP4 discussions as part of the regular meeting, or identify a separate regular technical meeting (Peter) • to work out/brainstorm the evaluation criteria (Peter + members); Whose work can I count on here? • to iterate with WP3 (Peter); • (later) write the report and pass over to WP5 (Peter);