1 / 15

UEMS Secretary General’s report on the European Accreditation Council for CME

Secretary General's comprehensive report on the new accreditation system for Live Educational Events, including statistics and standards for accreditation fields.

jazmin
Download Presentation

UEMS Secretary General’s report on the European Accreditation Council for CME

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UEMS Secretary General’s report on the European Accreditation Council for CME

  2. Introducing the new system for the accreditation of Live Educational Events

  3. Accreditation 2012 Live Educational Events • New LEE                                            1666 • Accredited in 2012                          1562 • Rejected in 2012                              36

  4. Accreditation 2012 E-learning Materials • Total number of applications              68 • Accredited                           38 • In amendment process                             18 • In review 11 • No follow-up from provider 1

  5. Why Accreditation? Potential impact: ECMECs Explicit standards Enhanced transparency Demonstrable accountability Stimulus for improvement

  6. SEVEN ACCREDITATION FIELDS

  7. The Learner Target audience Educational needs The rights of the individual The responsibilities of the individual Confirming learner engagement Feedback

  8. The Educational Activity International Defined objectives Learning methods Educational material Details of the activity Scientific validity and balance Fulfilment of the educational objectives

  9. The Provider Information on the Provider The Provider’s track record

  10. The Activity Developers Organisers Faculty A responsible registered doctor

  11. An ‘Internal’ Review Process By the Organising Committee Initiated by the Provider

  12. Ethics matter(s) Conflicts of interest Funding Absence of inappropriate influence Medicolegal, regulatory, industry, legal Free from bias Absence of advertising

  13. Process matters Application method EACCME decision-making Explicit timescales Amendment; Appeal Outcome Standards for the UEMS-EACCME

  14. SEVEN ACCREDITATION FIELDS

  15. Over-arching principles Five for accreditation… and another two! Discriminant Developmental Fair Evolutionary Relevant Specific Transparent

More Related