310 likes | 316 Views
Explore the critical aspects of public financial management (PFM) in Lebanon, focusing on budget preparation, coverage, execution, consequences of inadequate coverage, and recommendations for improvement. Key topics include budget process, coordination, extra-budgetary funds, coverage criteria, contingent liabilities, cash management, and the implications of insufficient budget coverage on efficiency and transparency.
E N D
Budget Coverage : Consequences & RecommendationsMounir Rachedpresident of LEAMay 2016 Overall public financial management (PFM) in Lebanon? PFM comprises two areas: budget preparation & Budget execution Full coverage is key to proper budgeting
I. Budget process • II. Budget coverage • III. Coverage and budgeting • IV. Coordination between current and capital spending • V. Cash management and coverage • VI. Transparency, Governance, and Fiduciary risk
I. Budget process • Development Strategy-priorities • Medium-term macroeconomic framework: Outlook for economic performance • Interrelated with:
I. Cont.. • Budget preparation Revenue estimates (tax policy) Expenditure level and composition (expenditure Policy) Financing Public debt
I. Cont .. • Budget execution Spending process/procurement(unified) Cash management Debt management Accounting Auditing-internal ad external control THE PROCESS CAN NOT BE IMPLEMENTED WITHOUT FULL COVERAGE
II. Budget coverage • An integral part of budget preparation and execution One of the five budgeting principles IT IS NOT SIMPLY ADDING NUMBERS TO BUDGET • Lebanon does not adhere to recommendations of International institutions in PFM (unified & universal budget) • Allows annexed & exceptional budgets
II. • Coverage presents itself as one of the main obstacles in reforming public finance.
II. • 19 percent of government spending is outside the regular budget.
II.Extra-Budgetary Funds-EBF • Include both current and capital spending • CDR is the largest • Independent Municipal Fund (I.M.Fund) • Social security
II.EBFs-CDR • It’s budget is only approved by COM • Manages foreign financed development spending but not counterpart funds
II.EBFs-Ind.Mun.Fund • Earmarked revenue but not all disbursed to municipalities- eleven taxes and fees. • Their actual expenditure is less than 3% of current budget • Allocation problems to towns and projects • Their budgets are not integrated in overall budget strategy
II.EBFs-NSSF (social security) • Should be integrated with central government budget and be: • part of government’s social safety network • As government collects social security payments and finances shortfalls
II.EBFs-others • Many activities are not disclosed to the government and the Ministry of Finance • Council of the South. • Fund for the Displaced • The Higher Relief Committee
II.Standard Criteria for coverage • All revenues should be in the budget • All expenditure should be in the budget • Revenue and expenditure should be classified on the same basis- IMF GFS 2002 guidelines
II. • Coverage is diluted when transactions are on net basis: • Municipalities electricity bills are deducted from their allocations • Municipalities finance Civil Defense • EDL provides subsidy to government and subsidized by government
II.Quasi-fiscal operations • BDL subsidies to banks and other activities • In part, cost of maintaining a fixed exchange rate through a high interest rate differential • Subsidies should be transparent and reflected in budget (coverage). • BDL losses are monetized rather than being covered by MOF (also lost revenue)
II.Contingent liabilities • loan guarantees to PEs. should be revealed in budget • Should be part of stock of debt
II.Government lending • No clear distinction between lending to PEs and subsidies.
III. Coverage and budgeting • Dual budgeting: capital & current budgets leads to: • Macroeconomic framework & • Medium-Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF): • MTEF links between policy priorities and public expenditure.
III. Cont… • MTEF determines allocation between line ministries • Allocation between current and capital spending • A macroeconomic framework and MTEF can’t be prepared adequately when full coverage is lacking
III. Cont.. • Undermines the “ top-down” approach to proper budgeting
III. Cont… • Ministerial ceilings can’t be appropriately set • Performance indicators can’t be set Essential in assessing performance
IV. Coordination problem between current and capital spending • Lack of integration (full coverage) leads to : -Inefficient capital/labor mix -Shortage of equipment and facilities -Insufficient provision for maintenance -Shortage of counterpart funds - Fragmented responsibilities for current/capital spending
IV. Cont… • Exampls: • Power plants without adequate transmission and distribution grids • Waste treatment plants with insufficient (or absence)delivery
IV. Cont.. • Need complementarity between: • MOF-planning, management & internal control • COM • Legislative dimension • Can’t be achieved without integrated budget
V. Cash Management and Budget Coverage • Cash planning and management is an integral part of public expenditure management • Main objective is to prevent un-anticipated borrowing that could disrupt monetary policy • Efficient use of idle balances • Avert accumulation of arrears-informal financing and debt accumulation
V. cont… • Good practices in Cash management - Treasury Single Account (TSA) • Ability to make accurate short-term cash inflows and outflows forecast • Coordination between debt maturity and cash flows
V. Cont… • Government is developing a cash management unit and a TSA is partially functional
VI. Transparency, Governance, and Fiduciary risk • Government has made some progress Comprehensive (coverage) public finance is key to reduce Fiduciary risk/transparency.
VI. Cont.. • Improvements needed to fulfill code: • Multi-year budget framework • Inclusion of all government activities • Eliminate extra-budgetary and quasi-fiscal activities • Improve expenditure control • Enhance external audit • Advance economic and financial information
VI.Cont… • Have all government liabilities transparent and known END