230 likes | 244 Views
This slideshow provides information memos, comments, and models for relevant parts of past exams, including a review problem on implied easements and a review problem on easement by prescription.
E N D
PROPERTY A SLIDES 4-24-17 NATIONAL PIGS-IN-A-BLANKET DAY
Music to Accompany Last ClassThe Best of Don McLeanfeaturing “American Pie” & “Vincent” Now on Course Page • All Info Memos Complete except Chapter 2 Tempest Write-Up • Comments & Models for Relevant Parts of 2014, 2015, 2016 Exams except 2015 Problem 2B (= Rev Prob 1G) • Comments & Models for All Sample Exam Bank Qs
Review Problem 5M (S137)Implied Easements Generally • Client Chris purchased warehouse from PPC & now using it. • DDD owns adjoining lot; doing construction • DDD discovers that water/sewer pipes serving C warehouse run through DDD lot. (Client would be Dominant Tenement) • No evidence of express easement. • Two parcels once had single owner. • All four types possible General Background?
Review Problem 5M (Sequoia) Easement-by-Implication • One parcel is split in two • Prior Use (“Quasi-Easement”) • Intent to continue prior use • *Apparent, visible or reasonably discoverable • *Some degree of necessity • Some states treat 4 & 5 as separate elements; some treat as evidence of intent Generally? Elements: Legal Factual? Run to Current Owners?
Review Problem 5M (Sequoia) Easement-by-Necessity • One parcel is split in two • Landlock: One resulting parcel is cut off from key access (e.g. to roads or sewer system) by the other resulting parcel (alone or in combination with parcels owned by 3d parties). • At time parcels split, access necessary to enjoyment of landlocked parcel [Can Cross-Reference Earlier Discussions] Generally? Elements: Legal Factual? Run to Current Owners? (Good-Bye to Sequoia)
OLYMPIC: Review Problem 5M:E-by-E & E-by-P EEL GLACIER
Review Problem 5M (Olympic) Easement-by-Prescription • [Actual] Use of Pathway • Open & Notorious • Continuous • Exclusive (Some states) • Adverse/Hostile [Can Cross-Reference Earlier Discussions] Generally? Elements: Legal Factual? Run to Current Owners?
Review Problem 5M (Olympic) Easement-by-Estoppel An owner may be estopped from barring a 2d party access to the owner’s property where • The owner apparently allows 2d party to use the property (Apparent License) • 2d party reasonably and detrimentallyrelies on this [Can Cross-Reference Earlier Discussions] Generally? Elements: Legal Factual? Run to Current Owners? (Good-Bye to Olympic)
Review Session Monday (5/1) 2pm Here Video & Slides Posted on Course Page Afterward Primarily Exam Technique General Advice Then for Each Type of Q: Advice/Common Problems Specifics Related to This Year’s Qs/Instructions After That, I’ll Take Your Qs 1st on Technique Then on Substance
Office Hours (Also on Course Page) Today 9:45-11:15 Saturday 1-5 Sunday 1-5 Monday (5/1) 9-1 Tuesday (5/2) 9-1, 2-6 I’ll Take E-Mail Qs (if Reasonable in Quantity & Scope) Sent by 6:00 pm, Tuesday 5/2
PROPERTY A: FINAL EXAM The Wonderful Land Law of Oz
PROPERTY A: FINAL EXAM The Wonderful Land Law of Oz Seven Characters = Seven Questions Q1 = Cowardly Lion Q2A =Witch of the North Q2B=Scarecrow Q2C = Munchkins Q2D = Wizard Q3 = Tin Woodman Q4 = Witch of the West
PROPERTY A: FINAL EXAM Balanced Topical Coverage: Each Chapter (Except 3) Tested in Two or Three Different Parts of Qs/Problems
ACADIA Acadia Sunrise
BADLANDS NORBECK PASS
EVERGLADES EGRET IN MANGROVE SWAMP
OLYMPIC EEL GLACIER
SEQUOIA SEQUOIAS