1 / 29

Property Reinsurance Market Overview: 2002 Renewals Analysis

This detailed analysis covers the 2002 renewals of Property Per Risk and Property Catastrophe Markets, highlighting impact of 9/11, changes in structure, price, and terms. Insights on market trends, price changes, and strategic observations.

jdickerson
Download Presentation

Property Reinsurance Market Overview: 2002 Renewals Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CAGNY Property Per Risk & Property Catastrophe Market Overview

  2. Agenda • Property Per Risk Market • 2002 renewals • structure, price, terms and conditions • Property Catastrophe Market • 2002 renewals • structure, price, terms and conditions • Prospects

  3. CAGNY Property Per Risk Market

  4. Property Per Risk Market • 2002 Renewals - Impact of 9/11 • WTC concentrated in limited number of risks • blown PMLs rather than accumulation of small losses • disproportional loss to risk reinsurance treaties • many risk programs experienced “blown occurrence caps” • disproportional loss to risk reinsurers • large risk syndication consisted of 25 markets + London • significant lines from only 15 markets • large cat syndication consisted of 50 markets + London • majority of loss ceded to a small segment within the property reinsurance market

  5. Property Per Risk Market • 2002 Renewals • per risk sample • 8 renewals (2001 to 2002) • 4 > $100m in limit, 4 < $100m in limit • 3 with WTC loss, 5 without WTC loss • exposure types • HPR, E&S, program, CMP • beyond the market reaction to WTC, numerous issues impacted the transactions within this peer study • a broader sample is required for definitive conclusions

  6. Property Per Risk Market • Structure • changes • retention • 7 of 8 maintained 2001 retention • limit • 6 of 8 maintained 2001 limit • small changes may be due to reinsurance market forces • significant changes may be related to cedant’s underwriting criteria rather than reinsurance market forces

  7. Property Per Risk Market • Price • changes • catastrophe loads • unicede data included in underwriting information • measuring volatility versus burning cost • markets are beginning to measure program volatility when pricing risk business • higher roe targets

  8. Property Per Risk Market Price Changes Premiums ceded, as a percentage of limit, doubled

  9. Property Per Risk Market • Terms and Conditions • changes • loss caps • terrorism exclusions • other issues

  10. Property Per Risk Market Loss Caps

  11. Property Per Risk Market Terrorism Exclusions

  12. Property Per Risk Market • Other Issues • risk definition • location versus insured • Cyber Risk • follow fortunes, if managed on front end • Toxic Mold - growing issue

  13. Property Per Risk Market • Observations - 2002 Renewals • little perceived difference in cedants’ risk management strategy • no fundamental changes to limits and retentions • price increases were significant • prices doubled across the sample • terms and conditions are “tight” • limited downside with exclusions or caps for systemic risk (e.g. terrorism and natural catastrophes)

  14. CAGNY Property Catastrophe Market

  15. Property Catastrophe Market • 2002 Renewals - Impact of 9/11 • loss primarily effected nationwide and super - regional programs • programs with commercial exposure • programs with wider syndication • regional personal lines portfolios tend to generate larger authorizations than commercial portfolios • with some exceptions, program losses were partial • loss to lower layers • higher reinstatement premiums • less cedant leverage

  16. Property Catastrophe Market • 2002 Renewals • catastrophe sample • 10 renewals (2001 to 2002) • 5 > $400m in limit, 5 < $400m in limit • 6 with WTC loss, 4 without WTC loss • 41 layers in 2001, 42 layer in 2002 • RMS output • exposure types • personal and commercial • nationwide, super-regional, single state • many factors, other than WTC loss, contributed to 2002 transaction specifics • a broader sample is required for definitive conclusions

  17. Property Catastrophe Market • Structure • changes • retention • two of ten companies increased their retention • limit • six of ten companies increased their limits purchased • 14% overall growth in limits purchased • while retention increases were minimal, a majority of companies in the peer study purchased more limit • may be from exposure growth in hard primary market • may be increased awareness of catastrophe liability

  18. Property Catastrophe Market Structure - Retention Two of ten programs increased their retention by 50%

  19. Property Catastrophe Market Structure - Limit Six of ten programs increased their limit by between 7% and 75%

  20. Property Catastrophe Market • Price • changes • greater attention to miscellaneous loads • fire following for EQ events • storm surge • demand surge • loss adjustment expense (+3-5% for wind; +5-10% for EQ) • APD losses (+2% impact to industry loss in “Andrew”) • annual inflation adjustment to TIV • other wind • cost of capital increase • significant impact on lower layers

  21. Property Catastrophe Market Prices - 2001 Notes: Layer CV is the standard deviation divided by expected loss. Risk charge is the percent of standard deviation added to expected loss to determine the deposit premium.

  22. Property Catastrophe Market Prices - 2002 Notes: Layer CV is the standard deviation divided by expected loss. Risk charge is the percent of standard deviation added to expected loss to determine the deposit premium.

  23. Property Catastrophe Market Prices - 2001 Versus 2002 ROL Cedants paid between 30% and 40% more for the lower and middle layers of their programs

  24. Property Catastrophe Market Prices - 2001 Versus 2002 Risk Charge Reinsurers doubled their risk charges on the lower layers of the sample

  25. Property Catastrophe Market • Terms and Conditions • changes • terrorism • excluded on commercial • coverage available for non “NBC” events on personal lines • Cyber Risk • often excluded via “side letter” • geographic specification • unless incidental, difficult to get coverage for international exposures within domestic treaty • natural perils • reinsurers backing off named peril restrictions

  26. Property Catastrophe Market • Observations - 2002 Renewals • cedants are purchasing additional limit • may be due to greater awareness of catastrophe risk and model uncertainty • sharp price increases within the lower and middle layers of catastrophe programs • miscellaneous loads • perils not modeled • deficits following WTC • successful introduction of terrorism exclusion

  27. CAGNY Prospects

  28. Prospects • Property Per Risk Market • price levels may be slow to decline • despite some new capital, quoting market is limited • requires both capacity and actuarial infrastructure • evolving pricing techniques may push costs higher • greater inclusion of catastrophe loads • @risk simulations to measure volatility • finite downside • limited reinstatements on working layers • underwriting for systemic risk • exclusions, sub-limits and occurrence caps for industry-wide losses

  29. Prospects • Property Catastrophe Market • significant downward pricing pressure • with new capacity, quoting market is vast • Bermuda start-ups • re-capitalization of existing reinsurers • large, stand-alone lines from domestics • evolving pricing techniques may push costs lower • increasing use of capital allocation models • generates credits for non-correlated exposures • influence of retrocessional costs is declining • pricing available from net line underwriters

More Related