150 likes | 163 Views
Improvements in Dystocia National Genetic Evaluation System and Data Processing. Improving Calving Ease Evaluation. Data quality Increase MGS identification Improve detection of duplicate records Genetic evaluation system Add MGS effect to threshold model Estimate parameters.
E N D
Improvements in Dystocia National Genetic Evaluation System and Data Processing
Improving Calving Ease Evaluation • Data quality • Increase MGS identification • Improve detection of duplicate records • Genetic evaluation system • Add MGS effect to threshold model • Estimate parameters
Calving Ease Scores 1 = No problem during calving or calving not observed 2 = Slight problem during calving 3 = Moderate difficulty during calving 4 = Considerable force used during calving 5 = Extreme difficulty during calving
Data • 10 million calving reports since 1980 • Pedigree data • From production evaluation system Increased MGS ID from 57% to 73% • Additional 2.5 million pedigree records for cows without unique national identification Allowing inclusion of data that does not meet requirements for production
Data Extraction Requirements • Calving Data • Single birth • Dam and sire of Holstein or Red & White breed • Sire age >18 mo and <15 yr • Birth date of Jan. 1, 1980, or later
Sire – MGS Model • MGS effect included • Evaluations of bulls as service sires improved by partially accounting for mates • Maternal effect on calving difficulty provided
Presentation of Evaluations • Evaluations converted to expected percentage of births that would be scored 4 or 5 (difficult) for heifers (%DBH)
Reliability • Calculated as inverse of diagonal • Overestimated due to assumption of perfect accuracy of parents
Status of Evaluation System • Test evaluations distributed to AI organizations • Web queries to display calving ease data available • First release of sire-MGS evaluations for calving ease in August 2002