Download
1 / 12
120 likes | 209 Views
Where we are trying to go?. Common outcome measures Quality data collection for outcomes A clear understanding of individual program process measurement needs Program evaluation practiced locally.
E N D
Where we are trying to go? • Common outcome measures • Quality data collection for outcomes • A clear understanding of individual program process measurement needs • Program evaluation practiced locally
To build capacity to move from reporting inputs/outputs at program level (the current state) to data-driven performance measurement and management linked to organizational goals and priorities (the future state). Purpose of Trainings
Four Logic Model sessions starting in November 2008 and running through February 2009. These sessions will be 3-4 hours each. Grantees will complete “Evaluation Planning” Worksheets. Grantees will complete and submit a data collection methodology. Grantees will submit data to Muskie by summer 2009. Training Overview
By early 2009, all JJAG grantees will have developed a project-specific Logic Model(s) and evaluation planning worksheets By mid 2009, grantees will have developed/modified existing data collection tools, developed an evaluation methodology, and started to collect data. Training Objectives - Overall
Differentiate the 3 levels of evaluation Understand the Steps in the Evaluation Process Recognize the advantages of Logic Models Complete a Basic Logic Model Training Objectives
What have we done? How well have we done it? How much have we done? How effective has our program been? What could we do better or differently? Was it worthwhile? Was it important? Program Evaluation Can Answer:
Process: (Interventions, Activities or Strategies) Impact: (Initial and Intermediate outcomes) Outcome: (Long-term outcomes) Use Three Levels of Evaluationto help answer the evaluation questions
Steps in the Evaluation Process 1. Engage Stakeholders START HERE 2. Describe Program 6. Ensure Use and Share Lessons Learned 5. Analyze and Interpret Data 3. Determine Evaluation Design 4. Collect Data
Program Overview Logic Model Intermediate Outcomes Program Components Initial Outcomes Long-Term Outcomes Interventions Outcome Process Impact
HIV Program Logic Model Template (for providers) Program Components (priority populations) Intervention Intermediate Outcomes (B) Initial Outcomes (KANS) Long-Term Outcome (Health) Group Level Six session HIV prevention education group in Correctional settings. Education will include condom use negotiation with sex partners. Unsafe Sex, Both Partners Male Persons attending the groups will report an increase in the intent to negotiate condom use with sex partners. Persons attending the groups will negotiate condom use with sex partners. Persons attending the group will use condoms with their sex partners. Decreased HIV trans- mission Improved well-being of HIV infected people *remember YOUTH, RACIAL and ETHNIC MINORITIES and PEOPLE with HIV throughout *KANS=Knowledge, Attitudes, Norms, Skills; **B=Behavior
Expectations: 1. Grantees will be responsible for completing multiple worksheets between sessions. 2. We will monitor your progress and report any delays in submitting assignments. 3. Muskie will provide ample TA. You can call on us if you have any questions.
