1 / 25

Forward-backward a symmetry in top- antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions

Forward-backward a symmetry in top- antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions. Regina Demina , University of Rochester 01/18/2012. Asymmetry in top- antitop production.

jeff
Download Presentation

Forward-backward a symmetry in top- antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Forward-backward asymmetry in top-antitop production in proton-antiproton collisions Regina Demina, University of Rochester 01/18/2012

  2. Asymmetry in top-antitop production • In early 80s asymmetry observed in e+e-m+m- at sqrt(s)=34.6 GeV<< MZ was used to verify the validity of EW theory (Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1701–1704 (1982) • Similarly, asymmetry in production could give information about new physics • Mediator with axial coupling in s-channel • Abnormally enhanced t-channel production • Complications: • Top is not observed directly, but reconstructed through its decay products • Proton and antiprotonare not point-like objects, lab frame is different from rest frame Reconstruction level Generator level p _ p m+ e- e+ m- Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  3. Definitions m+ t • Asymmetry defined for eemm • In proton-antiproton collisionsqy • Dy is invariant to boosts along z-axis • Asymmetry based on Dy is the same in lab and tt rest frame • Asymmetry based on rapidity of lepton from top decay • Lepton angles are measured with a good precision q e- e+ _ q q _ t m- Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  4. History of measurements and predictions • D0, reconstruction level • PRL 100, 142002(2008) • ICHEP2010 • CDF, generator level • PRL 101, 202001(2008) • Phys. Rev. D 83,112003 (2011) Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  5. Reconstruction of top-antitop signal Leptonic top Hadronic top 1581 events pass the selection requirements in 5.4 fb-1 Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  6. Asymmetry at reconstruction level • Using kinematic variables of l+jetsevents construct a discriminant and fit events with Dy>0 and Dy<0 for top fraction Leading b-jet pTc2of kinematic fit Discriminant, Dy<0 kTminMjj Discriminant, Dy>0 Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  7. Asymmetry dependence on Mtt MC@NLO Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  8. Generated asymmetry Problem with Method 1: migration of events near inner bin edge (Dy0) is underestimated, while for the outer edge it is overestimated Solution:fine bins closer to Dy=0 Problem: statistical fluctuations in data make the fine bin unfolding unstable Solution: employ regularization Bonus: reduced statistical uncertainties Method 2: fine bin unfolding with regularization • “Unfolding” =correcting for acceptance (A) and detector resolution (S) • Method 1: 4 bin Likelihood unfolding : Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  9. Method 2: fine bin unfolding with regularization Migration matrix Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  10. Results for asymmetry, in % • Reconstruction level (experiments cannot be directly compared, only to Monte Carlo after reconstruction and selection) • D0 (5.4 fb-1) • MC@NLO (D0) • CDF (5.3 fb-1) • MC@NLO (CDF) • Generator level (experiments can be directly compared) • D0 • CDF • MC@NLO Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  11. Lepton-based asymmetry, in % • Since lepton direction is defined with a very good precision, lepton based asymmetry is simpler to extract • Lepton from top decay carries information about underlying asymmetry at production • Can be directly compared to theoretical predictions Reconstruction level Generated level Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  12. Unfolded AFBlepvs AFB Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  13. Interpretation of the Asymmetry m+ t • Coulomb repulsion • QED: e+m+ • QCD: quark-top e+ e- • Coulomb attraction • QED: e-m+ • QCD: antiquark-top _ q q _ t m- Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  14. Predicted asymmetry in SM + Born( as2 ) and box(as4 ) • Coulomb-like repulsion of top and quark and attraction of antitop and quark in QCD • Interference – as3 • Positive asymmetry • Final state with no extra partonssmall transverse momentum of the tt system ISR (as3 ) and FSR(as3) • Interference – as3 • Negative asymmetry • Final state with extra gluons large transverse momentum of the tt system • Possible extra jets + Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  15. Modeling of gluon radiation • pTttspectrum suggests that gluon radiation might be mismodeled by MC@NLO+HERWIG • lower radiation is preferred • best agreement with PYTHIA ISR off • This suggests a higher contribution from 22 processes, e.g. Born+box Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  16. Asymmetry and gluon radiation • MC@NLO+HERWIG suggests strong dependence of asymmetry on pTtt • Some PYTHIA tunes suggest even more dramatic dependence while other do not – the main parameter that affects this behavior is angular coherence of ISR • Asymmetry dependence on pTttis a source of systematic uncertainty on the measured value of asymmetry • Higher weight of 22 processes (Born+box) would shift the predicted asymmetry toward more positive and higher values: yet it is hard to make 20% from 5% Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  17. New physics scenarios Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  18. S-channel: color-octet vectors (axigluons) Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  19. Experimental constraints on axigluons • Indirect • D-mixing MG>200GeV • EW precision (Zbb, GZ, shad) MG>500GeV • Direct – dijet resonances LHC ppG2 jets Atlas MG>2TeV (G/M<15%) From angular distribution MG>1.7TeV Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  20. Predicted asymmetries: axigluons Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  21. t-channel: Z’, W’ • Introduce SU(2)X that places (ut)Rin the same doublet • W’ carries “top number” thus suppressing like-sign top production at LHC • Predicted asymmetry due to W’ ~30% • More forward than SM or s-channel production • As a result observed asymmetry reduced to 20% • Least constrained by other experimental data, asymmetries in agreement with observed • Test this hypothesis by using top polarization Direct constraint : from like-sign tops at LHC Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  22. Top quark asymmetry at LHC • 2 problems compared to Tevatron: • Large fraction of top pairs (~90%) are produced in gluon fusion • Direction of quark (vsantiquark) is determined from the boost with ~70% accuracy Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  23. Conclusions • Using 5.4 fb-1 of data D0 measured asymmetry in top-antitop production • Asymmetry in leptons from top decay is • Presently D0 has recorded 10.56 fb-1 • Combination with CDF • Getting more clever in increasing the stat • Soon LHC will have enough qqbarttbar events to probe the asymmetries as well It’s a lovely mystery! Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  24. Systematics on A Regina Demina, University of Rochester

  25. Systematics on Al Regina Demina, University of Rochester

More Related