100 likes | 243 Views
New Guidelines on Protection of Tabular Data at Statistics Finland. Annu Nissinen annu.nissinen@stat.fi. Joint UNECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality Ottawa, Canada, 28-30 October 2013. Outline of the presentation.
E N D
New Guidelines on Protection of Tabular Data at Statistics Finland Annu Nissinen annu.nissinen@stat.fi Joint UNECE/Eurostat Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality Ottawa, Canada, 28-30 October 2013
Outline of the presentation • Protection of tabular data at Statistics Finland: pre-2012 situation • What has been done to improve our procedures on SDC • Current situation: where are we now and what’s next Annu Nissinen
Starting point in the end of 2011 • Internal guidelines on the protection of tabular data written in 2000-2002 • What has happened in ten years? • Legislation has changed, data protection methods and tools have developed • SDC practices at different departments of the agency have developed and adopted their own standards. The suitability of all those methods was not sure. Outdated, far from optimal methods existed. → Updating of the guidelines was needed Annu Nissinen
Starting point in the end of 2011 • Do we have enough resources? • As a state authority, Statistics Finland is dependent on public money → Setting limits to research and development work → Can we have up-to-date and optimal protection methods available? • How can we improve the situationwith this starting point? Annu Nissinen
Renewal of the guidelines • Two working groups to renew the guidelines • First task was to find out how the old guidelines were working in practice • Problems with the old guidelines: • Not pragmatic • Only few examples of very general sensitivity rules and protection methods • Partially too open to interpretations • Not even give a clear answer to which statistics they were to be applied Annu Nissinen
Renewal of the guidelines • Challenges met by the working groups: • No obligation for the departments or units to write down their protection methods → almost impossible to evaluate or compare the different methods in use • Collection of tacit knowledge isn’t easy • High expectations towards the renewal: “After renewal, all problems considering SDC will be solved (in theory and in practise).” Annu Nissinen
The new guidelines • How do the new guidelines improve the situation? • Solving problems caused by the old guidelines • The guidelines are clearer and more pragmatic and they should lead departments to check their current SDC methods and update them if needed • Preventing new problems • The SDC instructions need to be written and available • The departments are obliged to draft a formal list of the statistics in their responsibility needing protection against statistical disclosure Annu Nissinen
Current situation • New guidelines exist and the next step is applying them in statistics production • There’s a window of opportunity for changes in SDC practises due to other big changes in operating environment • Change takes time inside a big organisation • Resources for the change in practises? • Inside the agency the new guidelines can be seen as • unwelcome extra red tape and unnecessary increase in the workload... • ... or a possibility to improve the quality of statistics Annu Nissinen
Has the situation improved? • Adoption of the new guidelines (and possibly new SDC practises) still in process • Crucial success factors: • Right “marketing” • Right allocation of required resources Annu Nissinen