80 likes | 189 Views
ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH REFORM, STATE COVERAGE INITIATIVES BRIEFING, WASHINGTON, D.C., OCTOBER 26, 2007. NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION AND CA HEALTH CARE REFORM. D.C. and California-based nonprofit and nonpartisan think tank
E N D
ALLIANCE FOR HEALTH REFORM, STATE COVERAGE INITIATIVES BRIEFING, WASHINGTON, D.C., OCTOBER 26, 2007.
NEW AMERICA FOUNDATION AND CA HEALTH CARE REFORM • D.C. and California-based nonprofit and nonpartisan think tank • Met with and advised Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and his staff from outset • Concepts and research on individual mandate, “hidden tax” on the insured (Len Nichols and Peter Harbage), and shared responsibility used by administration and credited to NAF.
UNIVERSAL COVERAGE: CALIFORNIA’S ADVANTAGES • Strong citizen support for health care reform (77% concerned they can’t pay for cost of major illness; 70% percent think system needs major change; 72% back Governor’s plan; 61% in favor of Democrats’ pay-or-play bill (A.B. 8/ Nunez-Perata) • Support or interest in comprehensive reform from labor, big business (Silicon Valley Leadership Group), small business (67% of owners polled feel employers should contribute), insurers, and hospitals (CA Hospital Assn. supports Governor’s plan) • High-profile and activist governor negotiating with powerful unions and health advocacy groups
UNIVERSAL COVERAGE:CALIFORNIA’S CHALLENGES • High rates of uninsured; relatively low rates of existing employer-based coverage 4.9 million without insurance; 6.5 million, or over 20% of population, without coverage during year; CA employer coverage dropped from 64 to 54% from 1987 to 2005. • Political structure: undemocratic and archaic two-thirds rule needed for legislature to pass budget and any bills that raise taxes. 52-day Republican holdout over passing budget stalled momentum for health reform • Additional federal funding needed to finance reform, rather than MA “use it or lose it”; ERISA issues • Friction between Governor, G.O.P. minority in legislature, and labor over different health care proposals, notably affordability and business contribution
PROPORTION OF TOTAL FAMILY INCOME SPENT ON PREMIUM AND OUT-OF POCKET COSTS, NON-EMPLOYMENT BASED, 2007. For middle income, affordability involves both what one “can” and “should” pay AFFORDABILITY IS CRITICAL “Health Care Expansion in California: What Can Consumers Afford to Spend?” U.C. Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research, September 2007
THE MISUNDERSTOOD MANDATE? • Opposition to individual mandate in Governor’s plan a sticking point • Mandates and regulations will begin to reform individual insurance market away from risk selection in direction of competition on value • Guaranteed issue by insurers relies on mandates • Leaving out mandate compromises universality • Affordable benefit package must be available before individual mandate is enforced • Sensible and feasible outreach strategies and auto-enrollment will make enforcement, penalties rare
HOW THINGS STAND NOW • Special legislative session on health and water policy convened mid-September; Governor’s proposal put in legislative language early October: too little, too late? • California Labor Federation (state AFL-CIO) opposing Governor’s plan outright; Democrats and labor lukewarm at best • Assembly hearing scheduled 10/31/07
WHERE DOES CALIFORNIA GO FROM HERE? • One ballot initiative, none, or several? • Financing: lottery, sales tax, property tax reform, cost containment, or what? • Subsidies and the employer payroll tax: Splitting the difference? • “Nixon to China”? A deal can be cut: will leaders compromise and risk antagonizing their bases?