1 / 28

Unhappy patient

Unhappy patient. Following a Total knee. Summary. Incidence Aetiology Diagnosis Prevention. Historically 11%-18% not satisfied with TKR. Scott C et al. Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement 2010; JBJS 92-B, 9, 1253-1258. 1 Year: 18.6% not satisfied

jeneil
Download Presentation

Unhappy patient

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Unhappy patient Following a Total knee

  2. Summary Incidence Aetiology Diagnosis Prevention

  3. Historically 11%-18% not satisfiedwith TKR • Scott C et al.Predicting dissatisfaction following total knee replacement 2010; JBJS 92-B, 9, 1253-1258. • 1 Year: 18.6% not satisfied • Patient expectation • mental component score, depression and pain in other joints • Bourne et al patient satisfaction after TKR. CORR 2010,468:57-63 • Ontario 1703 primary TKR (2001-2005) • 19% Not Satisfied • Main predictor is patient expectations

  4. Painful TKR Intrinsic • Infection • Mal-alignment • Wear • Instability • Lysis • Instability • Coronal • saggital • Loosening • Soft-tissue impingement • Patellar clunk • Fabellar impingement • Popliteus tendon impingement • Component overhang

  5. Extensor mechanism problems • Patellar maltracking • Extensor mechanism disruption • (patellar fracture, patellar tendon rupture, quadricep tendon rupture) • Undersized patellar button with lateral facet impingement • Oversized patellar button with overstuffing of patellofemoral joint • Patella baja + alta

  6. Painful TKR Extrinsic • Hip pathology • Spinal disorders • Complex regional pain syndrome • Psychological disorder • Outcome expectation mismatch

  7. Diagnosis • History • Pain from start • Examination • Xray • Bloods • CT Scan • Nicoll D, Rowley DI. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2010 Sep;92(9):1238-44 • 56% of painful TKR had internal rotation errors • Arthroscopy

  8. Prevention • Choose surgeon • Infection, mal-alignment, instability, loosening, mal-rotation • Choose patient • Choose prosthesis

  9. Infection (21%-38%)

  10. Mal-alignment

  11. Done 2005 S Johnstone 2/4/9

  12. S Johnst

  13. SJ 7/8/09

  14. E M 30/9/04 Massive posterior slope and varus cut

  15. E.M 15/7/9 5/11/2010

  16. Wear 2009 2004 Instability

  17. Wear Lysis

  18. Wear

  19. Loosening

  20. Extensor mechanismPatella tracking

  21. Extensor mechanismPatella Fracture 2009 2006

  22. other 14/8/06 15/01/08 5/2/07

  23. 1/4/09

  24. Choose patient A higher rate of complications 32% • Amin et al. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006 Oct;88(10):1321-6

  25. Patient Expectation • Ghandi R et al. J Arthroplasty. 2009 Aug;24(5):716-21. Patient expectations predict greater pain relief with joint arthroplasty. • a greater expectation of pain relief with surgery independently predicted greater reported pain relief at 1 year of follow-up • Singh JA, et al. Pessimistic explanatory style: a psychological risk factor for poor pain and functional outcomes two years after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2010;92-B:799–806.

  26. Patient outcome expectation mismatch

More Related