1 / 14

A STB (Set-Top-Box) Penetration Study by TAM MEDIA RESEARCH Impact of CAS Implementation

A STB (Set-Top-Box) Penetration Study by TAM MEDIA RESEARCH Impact of CAS Implementation. Topline Findings February 10, 2007. About. Come Jan 2007, CAS got implemented in the Zone-1 areas of Mumbai, Delhi & Kolkatta

jenn
Download Presentation

A STB (Set-Top-Box) Penetration Study by TAM MEDIA RESEARCH Impact of CAS Implementation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A STB (Set-Top-Box) Penetration Studyby TAM MEDIA RESEARCHImpact of CAS Implementation Topline Findings February 10, 2007

  2. About • Come Jan 2007, CAS got implemented in the Zone-1 areas of Mumbai, Delhi & Kolkatta • In the first week of the month, TAM commissioned AC Nielsen to conduct a ‘Pay TV Homes’ estimation study in the CAS-mandated zones of Mumbai, Delhi & Kolkatta • The fieldwork periods were – • Mumbai : 12th to 16th January, 2007 • Delhi : 11th to 15th January, 2007 • Kolkatta : 11th to 16th January, 2007 • The fieldwork mid-point : 14th January 2007

  3. Methodology • This study was purposively limited to the CAS-mandated zones in the cities of Mumbai, Delhi & Kolkatta • The Zones were further divided into 100 sampling nodes, ensuring adequate geographical coverage of the Zones • Face-to-Face interviews using a structured questionnaire were conducted. The interviewee was the decision maker pertaining to cable subscription. • Sample Size = 750 respondents/city => 2,250 respondents across 3 cities • The fieldwork period was kept very tight & synchronized across the 3 metros, to ensure comparability

  4. The footprint of CAS… • Of the 7.96 Mn cable homes across the 3 metros, 1.63 Mn cable homes fall under the CAS-mandated zones (approx. 21% homes fall under the mandated zones) • C&S Homes under the mandated areas, in the respective cities – • Mumbai : 17% (0.55Mn of the 3.25Mn cable homes) • Delhi : 26% (0.68Mn of 2.61Mn cable homes) • Kolkatta : 20% (0.41Mn of the 2.1Mn cable homes)

  5. Scope of the study… • CAS adoption in the mandated zones of the respective cities • Profile of the ‘early adopters’ • Consumer Awareness

  6. STB/DTH off-take… • Across the 3-metros… • Of the 16.33L homes covered by the CAS footprint, 2.77Lac homes had taken up a STB/DTH connection to access ‘pay channels’ • ‘Pay TV’ homes amounted to 17% of the CAS-mandated area • Off-take across the metros exhibit significant differences… • Mumbai – 1.39Lac of 5.48Lac (25% penetration) • Delhi – 0.97Lac of 6.76Lac (14% penetration) • Kolkata – 0.41Lac of 4.09Lac (10% penetration) *Homes under the CAS-mandated zones

  7. Waiting in the wings… • Across the 3-metros… • An additional 1.98L homes claimed to have subscribed but awaiting installation of ‘pay TV services’ • An additional 12% cable homes waiting in the wings • The ‘under served’ segments varied by the respective metros… • Mumbai – 1.09L (20% awaiting installations) • Delhi – 0.43L (6% awaiting installations) • Kolkata – 0.46L (11% awaiting installations) *Homes under the CAS-mandated zones

  8. Cumulatively… • Mumbai most responsive • 25% homes had converted • 20% awaiting installation • Delhi & Kolkatta response rates level, at an aggregate level • Delhi was better served (14%) than Kolkatta (10%) • At a 3-metro level… • 17% homes installed • 12% homes awaiting installation • Nearly 1/3rd of the mandated area responded favorably for conditional access to pay channels

  9. Numerically speaking… • Of the 16.33L cable homes falling under the CAS-mandated zones across the 3 metros… • 2.77L homes had already opted for a STB/DTH connection(17%) • An additional 1.98L homes had subscribed but were awaiting for the installation (12%) • Cumulatively, 4.75L homes had subscribed comprising 29% of the CAS-mandated homes • At individual metro levels… • Mumbai – 1.39L homes installed + 1.09L awaiting installation = 2.48L homes subscribed • Delhi – 0.97L homes installed + 0.43L awaiting installation = 1.4L homes subscribed • Kolkatta – 0.41L homes installed + 0.46L awaiting installation = 0.87L homes subscribed

  10. SEC-wise penetration… • The highest off-take is observed in the higher SEC & the off-take declines as one comes down the SEC ladder • The off-take levels vary significantly across markets even at a SEC level… • Highest off-take is observed in the SEC A strata of Mumbai & zero off-take in SEC D/E of Kolkatta • The response by Mumbais’ SEC C is nearly on par with those from SEC A residing in Delhi & Kolkatta • Owing to the pre-dominant non-responsive lower SEC, the off-takes seem to have got dampened significantly Base : Installed STB Subscribers

  11. Awareness – Major ground to make… • Three areas were probed to check for awareness levels… • Knowledge of CAS-mandated areas • Requirement of a STB for viewing FTA channels • Rental schemes for STB’s • Despite low off-take in Kolkatta, consumer awareness appeared to be higher than in Delhi & Mumbai • Consumers residing in Delhi appeared to be the least aware of counter-parts from Mumbai & Kolkatta • Lets now see what the stated reasons for not buying into CAS… Base : All TV Homes

  12. Pre-dominant reason – Pricing !!(among non-STB Homes) Base : Non-STB Subscribers

  13. Summing Up… • Approximately, 21% of the cable homes in the 3-metros fell under the CAS-mandated area (Zone 1) • Off-take of the boxes was highest in Mumbai, followed by similar levels in Delhi & Kolkatta (Installed + Awaiting Installations) • A significant quantum of homes were awaiting installations (12% of 3-Metro C&S Homes) • The penetration of CAS had pre-dominantly taken off in the higher SEC’s of all the metros, zero off-take in the lowest SECs of Kolkatta • Consumer Awareness has significant ground to cover • Price, as expected, remained the pre-dominant reason amongst homes that had opted to remain FTA

  14. Implications for TAM • TAM will continually conduct & publish results from its monthly STB-penetration studies and commensurate changes brought about in the panel

More Related