350 likes | 358 Views
Explore biofilm testing models, including in vivo, in vitro, and in silico systems like chemostats, CDC Biofilm Reactor, annular reactor, flow cell, and Modified Robbins Device.
E N D
Biofilm models for the testing of antimicrobial-releasing materials. Dr Jonathan Pratten Department of Microbial Diseases UCL Eastman Dental Institute
Types of models A model is a pattern, plan, representation (especially in miniature), or description designed to show the main object or workings of an object, system, or concept. i.e. a simplified system that illustrates or exhibits the same behavior as the more complex, general system • In vivo • In vitro • In silico (Mathematical) We can control it!
Chemostats • Bradshaw and Marsh 1996 – 2002 • hydroxyapatite disks are immersed in the chemostat for known time periods • oral biofilms of 10 species • advantage of being able to investigate planktonic and biofilm modes of growth within the same system • the large fluid phase is not consistent with the in vivo situation where shear forces and a thin film of fluid are present on the oral surfaces
The CDC Biofilm Reactor was developed to provide consistent biofilm samples and growth conditions for evaluation of antimicrobial agents, surface treatments and materials. As described in ASTM 2562-07: “Standard Test Method for Quantification of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Grown with High Shear and Continuous Flow using a CDC Biofilm Reactor”.
Annular reactor (formerly the Rototorque) • produces • biofilms under shear conditions in a steady-state system • Li, 2000 & 2001
The Flow Cell • direct visualization of attachment • Stoodley 1997 onwards
good for direct visualisation • limited by the requirement to use a transparent surface • and also limited by the thickness of biofilm or time • or…use fluorescent viability stains • or…remove biofilms for visualisation
Modified Robbins Device Larsen & Fiehn
Constant Depth Film Fermentor • The advantage of generating a constant depth biofilm is that it is possible to enter a long-term quasi-steady-state where some properties of the film do not change significantly with time. • The Constant Depth Film Fermentor was first described by Coombe et al. (1982) to investigate the growth of dental plaque organisms and further developed by Peters and Wimpenny (1988). • Once a steady state has been achieved, perturbing the system becomes easy and unequivocal results can be obtained
sampling port air inlet medium inlet area of biofilm growth scraper blade PTFE pan disk of material PTFE plug turntable QVF glass housing drive shaft effluent
CDFF peristaltic pump effluent air outlet • inoculum vessel • single or mixed species 37°C
grow back trap CDFF peristaltic pump 37°C air outlet air outlet waste medium container medium reservoir
PTFE angled scraper blade position of main medium inlet position of silicone rubber ring PTFE pan PTFE pan plug stainless steel disc QVF glass cylinder direction of disc revolution
As well as being used for the study of bacterial perturbation (Pratten et al., 1998; Valappil et al., 2008) the CDFF has been used in studies evaluating: • Characterise ecological shifts associated with dental health and disease (Dalwai et al., 2006) • endodontic microleakage (Matharu et al., 2001) • oral malodour generation (Pratten et al., 2003) • the corrosion potential of dental plaque (Wilson et al., 1995) • gene transfer in oral biofilms (Roberts et al., 2001)
x1000 x10
thanks to…. • Everyone at UCL Eastman Dental Institute, especially • Prof Mike Wilson • Dr David Spratt • Dr Derren Ready • Dr Sean Nair • Dr Anne Young • Chemistry Department, UCL • Funding bodies: