1 / 12

Developing analytical tools to identify the ‘Fordian model’ in Europe

This paper explores the concept of Fordism and proposes clarifications to eliminate its vagueness. It analyzes the conditions for a durable 'volume' profit strategy and provides an analytical definition of the 'Fordian' model. The study aims to determine which carmakers in Europe adopted this model successfully.

jenniferg
Download Presentation

Developing analytical tools to identify the ‘Fordian model’ in Europe

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Developing analytical tools to identifythe ‘Fordian model’ in Europe Michel Freyssenet (CNRS Paris and GERPISA-international network) Bordeaux Conference, 14-15 november 2003 FORD, 1903-2003, The European History University of Bordeaux IV

  2. A daunting task :defining the widely used concept of Fordism • The urgency of eliminating any vagueness 2. A proposal of several clarifications 3. The conditions of durable viability of a ‘volume’ profit strategy 4. An analytical definition of the ‘Fordian’ model

  3. 1. The urgency of eliminating any vagueness • People use the expression “Fordism” indiscriminately nowadays to talk about a plethora of things • The traits attributed to Fordism are not specific • Is Fordism a combination of the aforementioned traits ? • In this case, which traits are necessary and sufficient ?

  4. 2. A proposal of several clarifications • Taylorism and Fordism are neither the origin of the separation between design and execution, nor its culmination • The post-war growth was ‘sloanist’ and not ‘fordist’ • Fordism isn’t the unique way to implement a ‘volume’ profit strategy

  5. 3. The restrictive conditions of durable viability of a ‘volume’ profit strategy • Why the Ford production system isn’t the “Fordian model” ? • Conditions and requirements of a ‘volume’ profit strategy

  6. ‘Volume’ profit strategy, 1 Characteristics Economies of scale trough sales of increasing quantities of standard models

  7. Conditions of possibility Homogeneous and rising markets Abundant and unionised workers Requirements to implement Offering a product that satisfies basic individual transport needs Standardisation and fluidification of production Get people to accept little differentiated work ‘Volume’ profit strategy, 2

  8. 4. An analytical definition of the ‘Fordian’ model • The ‘Fordian model’ • … distinct from ‘Taylorian’ and ‘Sloanian’ models

  9. Conclusion : to decide which carmakers were ‘fordian’, three questions should be answered • Was it the mode of national income growth that enabled a “volume” strategy to be pursued ? • Which were the carmakers actually trying to pursue this strategy ? • Which ones succeeded by adopting the means the Fordian model offers, and by convincing concerned parties to accept those means ?

More Related