1 / 12

Upper GI SSG Meeting Statistics

Upper GI SSG Meeting Statistics. Background. The SSG agreed to start looking at some data/indicators As a starting point, eight metrics were proposed This information is intended as a starting point to help shape our ideas for review of data in the SSG. Questions to consider.

jenniferpotter
Download Presentation

Upper GI SSG Meeting Statistics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Upper GI SSG MeetingStatistics

  2. Background • The SSG agreed to start looking at some data/indicators • As a starting point, eight metrics were proposed • This information is intended as a starting point to help shape our ideas for review of data in the SSG

  3. Questions to consider • Are these the right metrics? (We can change but not increase number) Could we discuss different ones each time? • How can we get data from the whole region for HPB indicators? • Is the data timely enough (most recent available NOGCA data is 15/16) • Is it useful to discuss these at SSGs? How could they be more useful?

  4. OG - % patients diagnosed after emergency admission • Source: NOGCA audit, patients diagnosed 14/15 financial year • % adjusted rate • All within NOGCA’s acceptable range

  5. OG - % patients who had a staging CT scan • Source: NOGCA audit, patients diagnosed 14/15 financial year • All below NOGCA’s acceptable threshold but likely missing data rather than not staged

  6. OG - % patients discussed at Specialist MDT with curative treatment pan • Source: Bristol cancer register, patients diagnosed 15/16 financial year and eligible for NOGCA audit • 41% • National % 13-15 (note two year period) per NOGCA audit: 37.6%

  7. OG - % patients who had ≥ 15 lymph nodes removed at resection Source: NOGCA audit, patients diagnosed 14/15 financial year UH Bristol – 90.8% (above national average)

  8. HPB – % pancreatic cancer patients having resection • Source: UH Bristol/NBT shared Cancer Register, waiting times dataset • Patients first seen at UH Bristol or NBT in 2016/17 financial year: 22%

  9. HPB - % patients with HCC who have a resection or RFA • Source: UH Bristol/NBT shared Cancer Register, waiting times dataset • Patients first seen at UH Bristol or NBT in 2016/17 financial year: 34%

  10. HPB - Number of resections for liver metastases • Source: UH Bristol/NBT shared cancer register, resections undertaken in 2016/17 financial year • 44 (plus 5 RFAs)

  11. HPB - % patients with recorded staging • Source: UH Bristol/NBT shared cancer register, diagnosed 2016/17 financial year, treated or first seen at UH BristoL • 8% (national target 70%) • Needs clinical support to state staging in MDT so it can be recorded. • National drive to improve staging

  12. Next steps • What metrics would we like to review next meeting? (Maximum of 8) • How can we ensure complete data? • What format would we like the information in?

More Related