190 likes | 392 Views
Knowledge Claims, Evidence & Evidential Arguments. Knowledge Claim. a declaration of conviction says I know that or I believe that…. Knowledge Claim. supported by evidence whose nature depends on the training and the experiment of the claimer
E N D
Knowledge Claim • a declaration of conviction • says • I know that or • I believe that…
Knowledge Claim • supported by evidence whose nature depends on the training and the experiment of the claimer • evidence can be a first hand observation, deference to authority or a plausible explanation
Knowledge Claim • deference to authority can range from naïve acceptance of the authority to a more careful consideration of evidence
Knowledge Claim • e.g. I believe the Leafs will win the Cup this year.
Evidence • data that supports the claim being made • authoritative person is making claim. Claim is dependent on their credentials
Evidence • e.g. I have been following the Leafs for over 30 years. I know what I am talking about.
Evidential Argument • an argument based on the evidence that is relevant to the listener. • Sometimes the evidence is given in the form of a critical experiment that is overwhelmingly convincing.
Evidential Argument • e.g. you all know me and believe that I know what I am talking about.
What is wrong with my knowledge claim?
E.G. A friend says, “ I think Dr. Pop is the best soft drink.” To convince you she says, • “Celine Dion recommends this product”. • 3 out of 4 people tested like it • a nutritional analysis shows that it has less caffeine and sugar than other drinks.
Which one of these arguments would convince you?WHY? • “Celine Dion recommends this product”. • 3 out of 4 people tested like it • a nutritional analysis shows that is has less caffeine and sugar than other drinks.
Evaluating Knowledge Claims • Is the evidence plausible? • Does it relate to my personal experience? • Could I do the experiment myself? • Can I model the experiment? • Will I achieve the same result?
E.g. The atom has a positive nucleus surrounded by negative electrons • Earlier claims said that the atom was a mass of positive and negative regions, “plum pudding model” • Rutherford performed the gold foil experiment • This showed that most of the atom was empty space
E.g. The atom has a positive nucleus surrounded by negative electrons • This led to wide spread acceptance of this new model • Experiment was repeated several times with the same results • Was considered a critical experiment