180 likes | 455 Views
______________________________________________________________________ a g raphical Analysis of the F ALL 2010 P RELIMINARY O PENING E NROLLMENT R EPORT of the Maryland Public Four Year Institutions January 2011. Preface. 2.
E N D
______________________________________________________________________agraphical Analysis of the FALL 2010 PRELIMINARYOPENINGENROLLMENTREPORTof the Maryland Public Four Year InstitutionsJanuary 2011 Prepared by the Office of Institutional Research University of Baltimore
Preface • 2 This graphical analysis provides a brief graphic overview of the enrollment of the public four-year universities and colleges of Maryland for fall 2010. The intent is to monitor by graphic illustration the broad changes in enrollment for these institutions. Comparisons are made herein for headcount only, on a one-year and five-year basis. Emphasis on the University of Baltimore is added. The data contained in this graphic overview is from following reports: • University System of Maryland Report, Fall 20010 Preliminary Opening Enrollment and FY 2011Estimated FTE Report*. • Maryland Higher Education Commission, 2010 Opening Fall Enrollment Data for Morgan State University and St. Mary’s College of Maryland is drawn from the second of these two reports, while the first report provides the data for the University of System of Maryland universities. The reader will note that the University of Maryland University College has exceptional enrollment growth. As a principally on-line institution, it draws much of its enrollment from outside the higher educational market of the Maryland public four-year institutions. It is included here for purposes on comprehensive coverage; comparison must be made with recognition of its substantially different mission and market service. Please send your questions and suggestions to the Office of Institutional Research, 602 AC Building. *Preliminary indicates that document is pending approval by the State of Maryland Board of Regents.
UB Highlights • Total Enrollment • 2nd in total enrollment, 5-year percent change • 3rd in total enrollment, 1-year percent change • Undergraduate Enrollment • 1st in full-time undergraduates, 5-year change • 2nd in full-time undergraduate, 1-year percent change • 2nd in part-time undergraduate, 5-year percent change • Graduate/Professional Enrollment • 4th in part-time graduate, 5-year percent change 3
UB Points of Concern • Graduate/Professional Enrollment • 10th in full-time graduate, 5-year percent change • 11th in full-time graduate, 1-year percent change 3
Total Enrollment, 1-year percent change Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 5
Total Enrollment, 5-year percent change Fall 2005 to Fall 2010 6
Full-time Undergraduate, 1-year percent change Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 7
Full-time Undergraduates, 5-year percent change Fall 2005 to Fall 2010 8
Part-time Undergraduate, 1-year percent change Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 9
Part-time Undergraduates, 5-year percent changeFall 2005 to Fall 2010 10
Full-time Graduate/First-Professional, 1-year percent change Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 11
Full-time Graduate Enrollment, 5-year percent change Fall 2005 to Fall 20010 12
Part-time Graduate/First-Professional, 1-year percent change, Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 13
Part-time Graduate Enrollment, 5-year percent changeFall 2005 to Fall 2010 14
First-time, Full-time Freshmen Enrollment Fall 2010 Market Share 15
First–time, Full-time Freshmen, 1-year percent change Fall 2009 to Fall 2010 14
First-time, Full-time Freshmen Enrollment, 5-year percent change Fall 2005 to Fall 2010 Note: 1) University of Baltimore is omitted from this chart, freshmen enrollments were not offered until fall 2007. (2) Table 3 in the USM source document mistakenly shows 4-year growth rates, although labeled as 5-year growth rates. The data is shown corrected above. 17
End of the Graphical Analysis of theFall 2010 Preliminary Opening Enrollment Reportof Maryland Public Four Year Institutions 18