1 / 23

Women, research and universities: a story of slow progress

Monitoring as a basis for policy decisions in universities and research institutions Prof. Dr. Jadranka Gvozdanović, Heidelberg University/LERU Gender Steering Group. Women, research and universities: a story of slow progress.

jenski
Download Presentation

Women, research and universities: a story of slow progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monitoring as a basis for policy decisions in universities and research institutionsProf. Dr. Jadranka Gvozdanović, Heidelberg University/LERU Gender Steering Group

  2. Women, research and universities: a story of slow progress • 1. The proportionoffemaleresearchers in the EU hasbeengrowingsignificantlyfasterthanthatofmen (5.1% annuallyover 2002-2009 comparedto 3.3% formen in the EU-27, Shefigures 2012, p.5). • 2. However, „women‘sacademiccareerremainsmarkedlycharacterizedby strong verticalsegregation“ (Shefigures 2012, p.6). In 2010: • 59% ofgraduateswerefemale, • 46% ofPhDgraduateswerefemale • 44% of grade C academicstaff was female • 37% of grade B academicstaff, • 20% of grade A academicstaff (humanities 28.4%, socialsciences 19.4%, vs. e.g. engineering 7.9%). • 3. The glassceilingindexstood at 1.9 in 2004, at 1.8 in 2010 (SF2012) • -> structuralobstaclesforwhichtargetedactionisrequired. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  3. European goodwill vs. the problem of implementation • ERA on gender equality ->Member States are invited to: • Create a legal and policy environment and provide incentives to: • remove legal and other barriers to the recruitment, retention and career progression of female researchers while fully complying with EU law on gender equality • address gender imbalances in decision making processes • strengthen the gender dimension in research programmes • Engage in partnerships with funding agencies, research organisations and universities to foster cultural and institutional change on gender - charters, performance agreements, awards • Ensure that at least 40% of the under-represented sex participate in committees involved in recruitment/career progression and in establishing and evaluating research programmes • Research stakeholder organisations are invited to: • Implement institutional change relating to HR management, funding, decision making and research programmes through Gender Equality Plans which aim to: • Conduct impact assessment / audits of procedures and practices to identify gender bias • Implement innovative strategies to correct any bias • Set targets and monitor progress via indicators. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  4. Monitoring – and then? • The LERU experience: compare data and gender-equality plans of member universities -> benchmarking and mutual advice. • The Equal Opportunity Offensive of the German Research Council (since 2008): evaluate Equal-Opportunity Plans and refuse funding to universities with insufficient EOP. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  5. Tackling the sources of slow progress: an example of a German university ranked among the best by the Ger. Res. Council • Heidelberg University: indicativebecauseitis a comprehensiveuniversity (all specializations). • Steadyyetslowprogress 2002-2011: • Grade A femaleacademics in 2002 8.6% vs. • in 2011 16% (German average 15.5%); • 3. Leakypipeline: • 51% femalePhDs (Ga 44.8%) • 27.9% (Ga 25.5%) Habilitation, RG leader • 18.6% Professors (grade A) withoutMedicine. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  6. The leaky pipeline of the University of Heidelberg 2008-2010 Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  7. Gender-equality measures • -> Measurestowardskeepingfemalescholars at universities: • a) Gender-specificmeasures, in placeaslongas a biasexists: • Special mentoringprogrammesandtrainingprogrammestowardsprofessorships • Protected time forresearchgiventopostdocsfor a limited periodof time; • Gender-blind measuresfromwhichwomenindeedbenefitasmuchasme: • Start-upprofessorshipstobridgethegapbetweenthefirst 6 yearpostdocperiodand a fullprofessorship; • Assessment guidelinesforbias-freeevaluationofscholarlyachievements • Work-lifebalancemeasures(childcare, additional fundingpossibilitiesforreplacementduring parental leave, etc.). • c) Structuralmeasures: genderresponsibilityofthe University Leadership, femalequotaforcommittees, gendertrainingfor all thegoverningandadministrationlevels; • -> yetthepipeline still leakes -> whereandwhoisaccountablefortheleak? Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  8. Where does the career pipeline leak?Diagnosing the problem • 1. The leakypipelineoftheentireuniversityis • slowlyclosing due totargetedmeasures; • 2. The careerleakforfemalescientistsoccurs after • thePhD; • 3. The careerpoint at whichthepipelineleaksisshiftingfromthePhDtowards Habilitation. • 4. Who isresponsibleforacquisitionofpersonel? • 5. Who canformulatetargetsandbeheldresponsiblefortheirattainment? Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  9. Assessment of responsibility -> assignment of responsibility -> monitoring -> evaluation • 1. The basic organisational units in charge of acquisition and choice of personel are the Faculties; • 2. The Senate, the President‘s Office and the Ministery have de facto controlling functions (although the President‘s Office de iure bears the responsibility). • 3. Monitoring of the Faculties reveals huge differences and a need for diversified measures. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  10. Monitoring faculties (comparison of three-year averages) shows: the leaky pipeline is multifacetted • Type 1: the leaky pipeline begins at the pre-university stage (Faculty of Physics and Astronomy; Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science) • -> measure: special info days for school girls introducing them to research in these fields (so-called MINT days). • (The following chart shows by dotted lines the Faculty‘s target values for 2011 and 2013.) Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  11. Leaky Pipeline Physics and Astronomy

  12. The pipeline leaks from the graduation • Type 2: thepipelineleaks after thegraduation (Facultiesof Law, Theology, Economics andSocial Science, Chemistry and Earth Sciences); • Different reasons: • tenuredpositionoflawyeror priest vs. doctoraland post-doctoraltemporarypositions; • Significantlyhighersalaries in businessandchemicalindustry. • Measures: trainingbyfemalescientistsasrolemodels etc. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  13. Leaky Pipeline Economics and Social Sciences

  14. The pipeline leaking after PhD • Type 3: the pipeline leaks after the PhD (Faculties of Philosophy and Medicine) • Measures: scholarships for protected research time for postdocs on university and faculty levels (acquired on a competitive basis). • The effect of these scholarships can be demonstrated by a comparison of the Medical Faculty Heidelberg, which has additional faculty scholarships , and the Medical Faculty Mannheim, wirthout them. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  15. Leaky Pipeline Philosophy

  16. Leaky Pipeline Medical Faculty Heidelberg

  17. Leaky Pipeline Medical Faculty Mannheim

  18. The pipeline leaks after the Habilitation at the latest • Type 4: the pipeline leaks after the Habilitation (Faculties of Modern languages and of Behavioral and Cultural Studies). • Measures: mentoring and training towards a professorship, possibility to apply for non-tenured (five year) start-up professorships through financial upgrading of existing positions (this is a general possibility, but more frequently applied here), co-financing of a research project on career decisions. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  19. Leaky Pipeline Modern Languages

  20. Conclusions • Thereis not onesolutionthatwould fit all. • Monitoring revealsthecriticalpoints at whichmeasuresareneeded. • Structuralchangecanbeeffectiveonlyiftheresponsibilitiesareclearlydefinedandthemeasuresapplytothecrucialpointsof • overtand covert discrepancies. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  21. Recommendations • In order to provide a basis for structural change, European research organizations (including universities) and government bodies should commit themselves to developing a methodology for monitoring and evaluating efficiency of actions. • Monitoring is done with respect to the levels and units capable of defining their own targets and responsible for the developments . • Monitoring should be coupled with incentives vs. denial of additional funding. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  22. Gender-equality monitoring and indicators • Gender-equalityindicatorsshouldtakeintoaccountthecountry-specific legal regulations(e.g. istheuniversity -internalpromotionto A-positionspossibleor not); • Gender-equalityindicatorsshouldbeevaluated relative tothecountry-specificaveragevaluesfor a position (e.g. A-position, i.e. fullprofessor) for a specificdiscipline; • Recommendation: monitorprogress in achievinggenderequalityalongtheuniversity-careerladdermeasuredbythediscipline-specificaveragesofsuccessive (e.g. threeorfive) sequencesofyears. Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

  23. References • Gleichstellungskonzept Universität Heidelberg 2013-2017, http://www.uni- • heidelberg.de/md/gsb/aktuelles/gleichstellungskonzept_univheidelberg_2013-2017.pdf • She figures 2012 • http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/she-figures-2012_en.pdf • Women, research and universities: excellence without gender bias (LERU position paper) • http://www.leru.org/files/general/LERU%20Paper_Women%20universities%20and%20research.pdf Institut / Thema / Verantwortliche(r) / Position

More Related