180 likes | 357 Views
Chapter 14 – Chemical Analysis. Review of curves of growth How does line strength depend on excitation potential, ionization potential, atmospheric parameters (temperature and gravity), microturbulence Differential Analysis Fine Analysis Spectrum Synthesis. The Curve of Growth.
E N D
Chapter 14 – Chemical Analysis • Review of curves of growth • How does line strength depend on excitation potential, ionization potential, atmospheric parameters (temperature and gravity), microturbulence • Differential Analysis • Fine Analysis • Spectrum Synthesis
The Curve of Growth • The curve of growth is a mathematical relation between the chemical abundance of an element and the line equivalent width • The equivalent width is expressed independent of wavelength as log W/l Wrubel COG from Aller and Chamberlin 1956
Curves of Growth Traditionally, curves of growth are described in three sections • The linear part: • The width is set by the thermal width • Eqw is proportional to abundance • The “flat” part: • The central depth approaches its maximum value • Line strength grows asymptotically towards a constant value • The “damping” part: • Line width and strength depends on the damping constant • The line opacity in the wings is significant compared to kn • Line strength depends (approximately) on the square root of the abundance
The Effect of Temperature on the COG • Recall: • (under the assumption that Fn comes from a characteristic optical depth tn) • Integrate over wavelength, and let lnr=Na • Recallthat the wavelength integral of the absorption coefficient is • Express the number of absorbers in terms of hydrogen • Finally,
The COG for weak lines Changes in log A are equivalent to changes in log gfl, qc, or kn For a given star curves of growth for lines of the same species (where A is a constant) will only be displaced along the abcissa according to individual values of gfl, c, or kn. A curve of growth for one line can be “scaled” to be used for other lines of the same species.
A Thought Problem • The equivalent width of a 2.5 eV Fe I line in star A, a star in a star cluster is 25 mA. Star A has a temperature of 5200 K. • In star B in the same cluster, the same Fe I line has an equivalent width of 35 mA. • What is the temperature of star B, assuming the stars have the same composition • What is the iron abundance of star B if the stars have the same temperature?
The Effect of Surface Gravity on the COG for Weak Lines • Both the ionization equilibrium and the opacity depend on surface gravity • For neutral lines of ionized species (e.g. Fe I in the Sun) these effects cancel, so the COG is independent of gravity • For ionized lines of ionized species (e.g Fe II in the Sun), the curves shift to the right with increasing gravity, roughly as g1/3
Effect of Pressure on the COG for Strong Lines • The higher the damping constant, the stronger the lines get at the same abundance. • The damping parts of the COG will look different for different lines
The Effect of Microturbulence • The observed equivalent widths of saturated lines are greater than predicted by models using just thermal and damping broadening. • Microturbulence is defined as an isotropic, Gaussian velocity distribution x in km/sec. • It is an ad hoc free parameter in the analysis, with values typically between 0.5 and 5 km/sec • Lower luminosity stars generally have lower values of microturbulence. • The microturbulence is determined as the value of x that makes the abundance independent of line strength.
Microturbulence in the COG 5 km/sec 0 km/sec Questions – At what line strength do lines become sensitive to microturbulence? Why is it hard to determine abundances from lines on the “flat part” of the curve of growth?
Determining Abundances • Classical curve of growth analysis • Fine analysis or detailed analysis • computes a curve of growth for each individual line using a model atmosphere • Differential analysis • Derive abundances from one star only relative to another star • Usually differential to the Sun • gf values not needed • Spectrum synthesis • Uses model atmosphere, line data to compute the spectrum
Jargon • [m/H] = log N(m)/N(H)star – log N(m)/N(H)Sun • [Fe/H] = -1.0 is the same as 1/10 solar • [Fe/H] = -2.0 is the same as 1/100 solar • [m/Fe] = log N(m)/N(Fe)star – log N(m)/N(Fe)Sun • [Ca/Fe] = +0.3 means twice the number of Ca atoms per Fe atom
Basic Methodology for “Solar-Type” Stars • Determine initial stellar parameters • Composition • Effective temperature • Surface gravity • Microturbulence • Derive an abundance from each line measured using fine analysis • Determine the dependence of the derived abundances on • Excitation potential – adjust temperature • Line strength – adjust microturbulence • Ionization state – adjust surface gravity
Projects! • You may work in teams (1, 2 or 3 students) • Perform an analysis of the spectrum • Confirm the atmospheric parameters • (optional) Measure the abundance of the atomic species in homework 3 • Use Moog: • Chris Sneden – MOOG • or use the computers in Rm 311 with Moog already installed
Data • Select one of the data archives • FTS archive • Wallace & Hinkle 1996, APJS, 107, 312 • DPP: NOAO Digital Library • ELODIE archive • Prugniel & Soubiran 2001, A&A, 369, 1048 • The ELODIE archive • Others? • Work with published EQW data • Select a sample of stars, at least one per team member
What’s known? • Review the literature for your selected object • extant photometry • 2MASS, ISO data? • radial velocity measurements? • IUE/STIS spectra? • previous atmospheric analyses? • metallicity determinations? (see Catalogue of [Fe/H] (Cayrel de Strobel+, 1997)
Step 3 • Measure equivalent widths/detailed COG • Spectrum Synthesis? • Use Thevenin line data • wavelength • e.p. • gf • may work differentially to Arcturus (optical or IR) or the Sun if needed