1 / 29

DDI Session II: Analyzing and Tracking Data

DDI Session II: Analyzing and Tracking Data. May 2014 David Abel, Fellow for Curriculum and Assessment/ELA. EngageNY.org. Session Objectives. Be able to describe what to look for when analyzing student work for a Common Core-aligned assessment

jered
Download Presentation

DDI Session II: Analyzing and Tracking Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. DDI Session II: Analyzing and Tracking Data May 2014 David Abel, Fellow for Curriculum and Assessment/ELA EngageNY.org

  2. Session Objectives Be able to describe what to look for when analyzing student work for a Common Core-aligned assessment Be able to create a data tracker for assessments Develop questions that drive data-analysis meetings around Common Core-aligned assessment data Engageny.org

  3. AGENDA Introduction Warm Up: Quick Review of Assessment Design Looking at Student Work Tracking Student Work Leading a Data Meeting with Questions Q & A Engageny.org

  4. Introduction Who am I? what do I do? Why do I do it? Engageny.org

  5. Where we’ve been, where we’re going with DDI DDI session I ( Feb NTI): Assessment Design DDI session II (May NTI): Analysis* DDI session III (July NTI): Action Plan Engageny.org

  6. Review of Session 1: Assessment Design What do we know about this student, based on this response? What DON’T we know about based on this response? Engageny.org

  7. Review of Session 1: Assessment Design Key understandings • Text selection matters….a lot • Comprehension is king • Sometimes we do don’t know what we don’t know—but we aim to find out! Engageny.org

  8. Analysis “Dusting for fingerprints” Tracking the data from the assessments Engageny.org

  9. Analysis Drawing conclusions from the data “Connecting the dots” Engageny.org

  10. The challenges of analysis Looking for that sweet spot between doable and useful! We don’t want to “granularize” content… …but we have to do somethingto look “under the hood” in order to move forward We want our students engaged in rich tasks… …but we want to dig into the work associated with the tasks to learn specificsabout what our students know and can do We don’t want to reduce student data to a “checklist” where the complexities of expository writing are reduced to 0s and 1s …but we want usable information about how are kids are doing with respect to the demands of the Common Core Engageny.org

  11. The challenges of analysis Tracking data Read the grade 8 “Brain Birds: Amazing Crows and Ravens,” on page 2, the prompt on page 5, and the rubric on page 7. Then, read student responses #1, #2 , #3 and #4 (pages 8-11) In groups, looking at the prompt, the rubric, the responses, discuss what data you can track from these responses. Feel free to use the Data tracking sheet on page 13 of your handout if you want. Engageny.org

  12. Sample Data tracking template DATAPOINTS: the WHAT of what you are capturing DATA DESCRIPTORS: the HOW/HOW MUCH of what you are capturing Engageny.org

  13. Data Tracking: option 1Follow the rubric >2 pieces of evidence Mostly literal recounting ??????????? PLUS: validates scores on rubric DELTA: not specific, does not tell us granular info Engageny.org

  14. >2 pieces of evidence Data Tracking: option 2Beyond the rubric Mostly literal recounting PLUS: validates score on rubric; more detail than option 1 DELTA: Engageny.org

  15. Data Tracking option #3 (adapted Erie 2 BOCES DDI tracker) Engageny.org

  16. Data Tracking option #3 (adapted Erie 2 BOCES DDI tracker) Engageny.org

  17. Trend analysis One: acknowledge that for this task, the line between the evidence and the claim can be blurry Students 2-4 are not moving beyond literal claims, vs. student 1 who makes a claim about crow and raven intelligence. Students 2-4 are not able to produce writing without errors that interfere, to varying degrees, with readability Student 2 does not include a second piece of evidence Engageny.org

  18. Trend analysis…with a touch a hypothesis Student 2 gives two pieces of literal evidence, and likely comprehends the question and aspects of the text. Student 3 gives one piece of literal evidence, and likely comprehends the question and aspects of the text. Student 4 largely reiterates the prompt, but possibly demonstrates some evidence of comprehension the question and/or the text. Engageny.org

  19. The formative advantage Through scaffolding towards an assessment that is embedded in curriculum, you can gather important data points for tracking Example: from Grade 10 Module beginning on page 14(text except on page 12) Engageny.org

  20. Deconstructing Grade 10 prompt HOW: Explain/analyze RHETORIC: Student must know what this is, how it is used, how to identifyit, how the author uses it PURPOSE: Student must know what the purpose of this paragraph is, and possibly how it relates to the purpose of the entire letter Grade 10 Prompt: How does King use rhetoric to advance his purpose in paragraph 9? CCSS.ELA-LITERACY.RI.9-10.6Determine an author's point of view or purpose in a text and analyze how an author uses rhetoric to advance that point of view or purpose. Engageny.org

  21. Student-facing worksheet for 9-12 Engageny.org

  22. Data-analysis meetings What are the common understandings and norms that can drive productive data-analysis meetings? How to develop questions that will drive these meetings? How to use existing Bambrick models for these meetings? Engageny.org

  23. Data-analysis meetings What are the common understandings and norms that can drive productive data-analysis meetings? THE LEAP OF FAITH Engageny.org

  24. Data-analysis meetings DDI is organic—not one-size-fits-all. DDI is messy—sometimes the connected dots make a clear picture, sometimes they do not. The leap of faith necessary is to see value in this work, to want to dig in and play detective/investigative journalist in the interest of more effective instruction. Calibrate on understanding, because it takes a village to do this work! Engageny.org

  25. Data-analysis meetings Teachers and administrators must come to consensus on DDI Teachers must reflect on what they need to know and be willing to brainstorm with administration. Administration must create a climate that is safe for this work Engageny.org

  26. Data analysis meeting questions • Using Bambrick model • Not going to be as neat and tidy, but you can grow this from Bambrick… • Case Study from Erie 2 Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES… Engageny.org

  27. Data analysis meeting questions Engageny.org

  28. Q&A Questions? Open issues? Strong opinions about the next session (action plan)? Engageny.org

  29. THANK YOU David Abel dabel@mail.nysed.gov http://www.engageny.org/resource/regents-exams Engageny.org

More Related