190 likes | 337 Views
INFLATION STUBBORNESS IN EMU : ARE WAGES TO BLAME ?. ‘STICKY’ INFLATION FROM 2000 ONWARDS. …in contrast with past slowdowns. Negotiated wages. BACKGROUND : Promise of EMU. Background : Falling wage share in GDP. Background : Restored profitability (‘60—’72 equals index 100).
E N D
Background : Restored profitability(‘60—’72 equals index 100)
TOTAL WAGES : Negotiated wages + wage drift + or – taxes) (COMPENSATION PER HEAD)
US – experience : Supporting growth is good for price stability
Wages and inflation : A rule of thumb • Nominal unit wage costs in line with the price stability target • In that case : • Real wages are in line with productivity • Wage compensation for inflation equals ECB’s inflation obejective • No pressure on profit margins • No wages and prices running after each other’s tail
If ‘levels’ of wage increase in line with price stability, what about its small-reaction to the growth slowdown ?
One explanation : Wages as the victim of ‘succesful’ wage moderation ?
Another explanation • With inflation already at an historical low, the ‘Keynesian’ downwards nominal wage rigidity may ‘bite’. • What mandat for a central bank ?
Implications for monetary policy • Watch out for the deflation trap ! • Instead, support growth and employment while keeping price stability by riding the Philips curb