210 likes | 382 Views
MOBILITY FUND OVERVIEW. 18 th Annual Oregon Connections Telecommunications Conference Hood River, Oregon Mark P. Trinchero Davis Wright Tremaine LLP marktrinchero@dwt.com October 25, 2013. Universal Service Transformation and the Mobility Fund?. Background of Universal Service Funding
E N D
MOBILITY FUND OVERVIEW 18th Annual Oregon Connections Telecommunications Conference Hood River, Oregon Mark P. Trinchero Davis Wright Tremaine LLP marktrinchero@dwt.com October 25, 2013
Universal Service Transformation and the Mobility Fund? • Background of Universal Service Funding • Historically, “implicit” support hidden in Inter-Carrier Compensation rates • Telecom Act of 1996 Created an Explicit fund • Supported multiple carriers: Identical Support Rule • Concerns about size of USF • Supporting multiple carriers in the same area • FCC eliminated Identical Support Rule and Capped Mobile Support at 2008 Levels • Competitive carrier support ≤ ILEC in the area
Universal Service Transformation and the Mobility Fund? • FCC’s “Transformation Order” Set Budget for USF Program For First Time • Wireline carriers: Connect America Fund ($4B) • Wireless carriers: Mobility Fund (two phases) • New funds for Remote Areas and Tribal Lands • Rural Health Care Fund becomes Healthcare Connect Fund • Schools and Libraries Fund remains • Low-Income (Lifeline) Fund remains, with substantial reforms
Mobility Fund Structure • Phase I • $300M (plus separate $50M for Tribal lands) • Awarded by reverse auction (first ever) • One-time; no continuing support • Phase II • $500M annually • Continuing support each year • Awarded for a period of years (period TBD)
Mobility Fund – Phase I • What areas were eligible? • Unserved by either 3G or 4G wireless service • 3G = at least 50 kbps uplink, 200 kbps downlink • 4G = at least 200 kbps uplink, 768 kbps downlink • Determined at the census block level (is the “centroid” of the census block unserved?) • Who could bid in an area? • Designated as an “Eligible Telecommunications Carrier” (ETC) in the area • Access to spectrum in the area • Certify to financial and technical qualifications
Mobility Fund – Phase I (cont.) • Winning Bidder Obligations • For at least 75% of the road miles in the bidding area, deploy either • 3G service within 2 years, or • 4G service within 3 years • Service must include voice, which must be available on a stand-alone basis • Reasonably comparable rates • Offer co-location on new towers in the area, on reasonable terms • Comply with FCC data roaming obligations • Drive testing, reporting, record retention, etc.
Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 • Auction 901 Procedures • Identified > 460,000 census blocks that lacked 3G or better mobile service, and also contained road miles (out of ≈ 8,200,000 census blocks in US) • Determined number of road miles in each census block (total of 650,000 road miles) • For bidding purposes (except for Alaska and some tribal lands), aggregated these census blocks by census tracts • 6,100 biddable census tracts • Bids were submitted based on dollars/road mile • Reverse auction: lowest bidder wins
Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 • Auction 901 Procedures (cont.) • $300 million cap for overall Phase I support • Bids ordered from lowest to highest per road mile • “Work up the list” until the $300M is gone • Tribal bidders received 25% advantage when bidding on their own tribal areas (but no reduction in support) • Process means there are “two ways to lose” your bid: • Not the lowest bid in the census tract, or • Lowest bid, but bid too high in comparison to other bids nationally (i.e., the $300M was already allocated to lower bids)
Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 • Auction 901 Procedures (cont.) • Designed to fund “the least costly of the most costly” areas • Must cover at least 75% of road miles, but support prorated for road coverage between 75% and 100% • Competing with other bidders in the same area, and with all bidders in all other areas
Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 • Auction 901 Results (announced 10/3/2012) • 52 qualified bidders; 33 submitted at least one winning bid • 894 bids submitted; 795 winning bids (about 13% of biddable cnsus tracts) • 31 states and 1 territory had winning bids • Winning bids covered c. 83,000 road miles (out of a 650,000 eligible) • Winning bids ranged from $130/road mile to $45,000/road mile • Average winning bid: $3,593/road mile
Mobility Fund – Phase I: Auction 901 • Auction 901 Results: Top State Winners Total SupportRoad Miles$/Road Mile ID $32,840,434 2,697 $ 12,177 CO $32,649,205 3,985 $ 8,193 NC $26,108,602 972 $ 26,861 TX $24,916,904 14,364 $ 1,735 WY $22,831,980 13,577 $ 1,682 NV $21,060,478 2,776 $ 7,587 NM $17,895,266 17,920 $ 999 VA $12,414,554 753 $ 16,487 WV $10,611,162 344 $ 30,846 OK $10,376,072 1,339 $ 7,749
Winning Bids in Oregon and Washington • Oregon had one winning bidder on two census tracts in Baker County • Total Awarded Amount = $123,081.40 • Covering 946.78 road miles • @$130.00/road mile • Washington had two winning bidders on seven census tracts spread across Cowlitz, Grant, Lewis, Lincoln and Skamania Counties • Total Awarded Amount = $10,139,520.56 • Covering 2963.70 • @$1,244.00/road mile to $24,753.00/road mile
Tribal Mobility Fund Phase I: Auction 902 • Scheduled for December 19, 2013 • Short Form Applications Originally Due By COB October 9th • Federal Government Shutdown Resulted in Suspension • Awaiting New Deadlines • Will the December 19th date slip?
Tribal Mobility Fund Phase I: Auction 902 (cont.) • $50M Set Aside for Tribal Lands • Most procedures similar to MF I Auction 901 with some important exceptions • Tribally-owned entities are favored with: • 25% Bidding Credit • Do Not Need to Have ETC Designation Prior (just pending application) • Remains Difficult for Many Tribal Entities • Trouble Obtaining Letters of Credit
Mobility Fund – Phase II • Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (FNPRM) in MF Phase II issued as part of Transformation Order • Additional Public Notice (PN) refining issues: DA 12-1853 in WT Docket No. 10-208 (12/21/2012) • The resolution of many important issues remains uncertain
Mobility Fund – Phase II • Overall Structure (as set forth in FNPRM) • $500M annually (up to $100M of this will be reserved for Tribal Areas, including AK) • Distribution by reverse auction • Purpose: “ensure 4G wireless services in areas where such service would not otherwise be available” • Eligibility criteria to be same as MF I • Service must include voice service, and voice service must be offered on a stand-alone basis • Public interest obligations similar to MF I
Mobility Fund – Phase II • Refining the Issues: The 12/21/2012 PN • Eligible Areas • Prioritization of Eligible Areas • Term of Support - 10 years? • Support from multiple mechanisms (MF II, CAF)? • Tribal Priorities - Interaction with 25% tribal bidding credit?
Mobility Fund: Final Observations • $300M in Phase I covered just under 13% of unserved road miles • It will take a lot of money to cover all unserved road miles (CTIA has estimated $7.8B to $21B) • Amounts in Phase II ($500M annually) plus Phase I ($300M one-time) are dwarfed by annual wireless industry capital expenditures ($20B+)
Mobility Fund: Were You Moved? Thank You! Questions? Email: marktrinchero@dwt.com