1 / 41

Long-Term Care: Balancing Systems and Costs

Long-Term Care: Balancing Systems and Costs. Christine G. Williams, M.Ed. Director Office of Communications and Knowledge Transfer Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. What Is Long-Term Care (LTC)?. Broad range of personal, social, and medical supports and services

jericho
Download Presentation

Long-Term Care: Balancing Systems and Costs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Long-Term Care:Balancing Systems and Costs Christine G. Williams, M.Ed. Director Office of Communications and Knowledge Transfer Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

  2. What Is Long-Term Care (LTC)? • Broad range of personal, social, and medical supports and services • Affects persons of all ages with physical or mental impairments, who cannot function independently • Need for services projected 3+ months • Services and housing both essential to LTC policy and systems • Delivered across a range of settings

  3. How Is the Need for LTC Defined? • The need for LTC is defined: • Needing help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs): eating, bathing, dressing, toileting, transferring or • Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs): meal preparation, shopping, managing money, etc • Persons with cognitive impairments • Alzheimer’s and related dementias

  4. Who Is Most Likely to Need LTC? • Demand affected by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and marital status • Need increases with age • Dramatic increase in physical and cognitive disability over age 85 • Demand higher among women • Demand higher among those living alone

  5. Demographics of LTC Population • 57% needing LTC are over 65 ― 17% of elderly population • 40% are adults 18-64 ― 3.3 million = 2.1% population • 3% children = 400,000 (Nat’l Academy on Aging l997)

  6. Boomers turn 65 in 7 Years! • Disability declining by 1% per year • BUT in 2000-2030, 65+ = 35  71 million • 12.4%  20% of total population • Populations Triple – 85+ • 65+ in nursing homes (NH) • 65+ with ADLs • Racial/ethnic diversity – disability higher • Women outlive men, yet more disabled • Fewer informal caregivers: smaller families, divorce, childlessness

  7. The Oldest Old: Fastest Growing Age Group • People ages 85+ have the highest rates of disability – their numbers will increase by 31% by 2025 • Cognitive impairment – Alzheimer's and related dementias – increases dramatically with increasing age • Nearly half of all NH residents have some form of dementia

  8. LTC: How Is It Financed? • LTC financing is a patchwork of public (Federal, State, local) and private dollars • Medicaid largest payer – 43% spending • Out-of-pocket spending – 24% • Medicare – 17% • LTC insurance – 4 -11% • RAND estimates value of informal caregiving up to $200 billion annually – 80% at home rely ONLY on unpaid care

  9. Medicaid Spending Trends for LTC • All Medicaid spending grew 105% ― 1993-2003 • Spending for home and community-based services (HCBS) grew 564% • FY’03 Medicaid LTC spending • $44.8B – NH • $27.8B – HCBS • $11.3B – intensive care facilities/mentally retarded (ICF/MR)

  10. National Trends in LTC Financing and Services • States trying to “rebalance” LTC systems • More State, Federal, local resources committed for choice of services and settings • Using multiple strategies to rebalance • Combining financing and org of delivery systems to shift funds from NH to HCBS • NH occupancy rates declining • But remaining residents are older and more dependent

  11. Delivery System Is Flawed • Little person- or family-centered care • No real integration of services across time, settings, and providers • Inadequate attention paid to transitions • Poorly trained professionals and paraprofessional workforce • Inadequate information systems to evaluate quality and track outcomes

  12. What the Research Tells Us • People would prefer to remain in the community – yet 70% of Medicaid LTC dollars spent on institutional care • There is unmet need for LTC in the community • At least 15% of nursing home residents could be cared for in the community • Some Federal LTC demos show expanded home care not offset by less NH spending • But a few State studies show cost-effectiveness • Quality remains a serious issue in all settings

  13. Challenges Facing State Policymakers • Demographic realities • Rising expenditures for LTC • State budget crisis • Fragmented delivery and financing system • Quality problems in most settings • Demand for formal and informal caregivers growing – supply shrinking • Comprehensive LTC system unlikely

  14. State Responsibility:Health and LTC Care for 65+ • Limited responsibility for ages 65-75 • Primary burden for States – over age 75 • Primary State issue disability, not health • States must obtain Federal waiver for community-based care – institutional care mandated as Medicaid benefit • Responsibility for “dual eligibles”

  15. Elderly Medicaid Beneficiaries:“Dual Eligibles” • Medicaid beneficiaries much more likely than the total Medicare population to be: • Oldest and poorest • In fair or poor general health/MH • In greater need of ADL or IADL • Users of more resources • 40% racial/ethnic minority populations • 16% Medicaid enrollees – 42% costs • 18% Medicare enrollees – 42+% costs

  16. Low-Income Protection Under Medicare • Qualified Medicare Beneficiary (QMB) • Up to 100% poverty • Medicaid pays for Medicare Part B Premium and copays • Specified Low-Income Medicare Beneficiary (SLMB) • 100-125% poverty • Medicaid pays for Part B Premium only • Relatively few in the eligible population have been enrolled

  17. Medicaid and Persons with Disabilities • Elderly and disabled account for 1/3 of Medicaid beneficiaries but 2/3 of Medicaid spending • 7 million disabled qualify for Medicaid • Of these, only 2 million are elderly • Younger disabled increasing as a percent of Medicaid • Medicaid spends more per beneficiary on the elderly than on the disabled • Medicaid spends more in total on nonelderly disabled than any other group Source: Vladeck et al, Health Affairs, vol. 22 (1); 2003

  18. Medicaid and Persons with Disabilities • More diverse population • Physically disabled children and/or adults • Mentally ill • Mentally retarded/developmentally disabled (MR/DD) • NH spending shrinking minority of total LTC $$ on younger disabled • Medicaid spending for disabled will continue to increase both absolutely and relative to other covered populations Source: Vladeck et al., Health Affairs,Vol 22 (1); 2003

  19. Olmstead, Medicaid, and LTC • Olmstead vs. L.C. (1999) • U.S. Supreme Court ruled that States must provide services in the “most integrated setting” • Violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act to provide services only in institutions if a person’s needs can be met in a community-based setting • Encourages States to re-evaluate how they deliver publicly funded long-term care services • Barriers to full community integration continue • Financial constraints on Medicaid in States

  20. Where Do Elders Receive LTC Services? • 81% with ADL/IADL needs are in the community • Unmet need in community – 37% of ADL-impaired elderly in community need help or additional assistance • Only 5% of elderly needing LTC are in NH • Supply of beds/occupancy rate for 75+ declined – LTC needs increasingly being met outside of nursing homes

  21. Home- and Community- Based Services • States expanding HCBS options – but 70% Medicaid LTC $ still institutional • Overall, greatest increase in HCBS for younger disabled – MR and DD • Overall savings unclear – “woodwork” effect • Potential cost savings in HCBS – Alecxih, et al.,1996 study in Washington, Oregon, and Colorado

  22. Nursing Homes: Whom Do They Serve? • NHs serve small percent of functionally impaired elderly (4-5%), but dominates LTC financing • NH pop. older, more disabled, frail, cognitively impaired (50%), need more skilled care • Likelihood of needing NH care increases dramatically with age – 50% of residents are 85+ • Lack of financial resources or family caregivers contributes to need for nursing home care • 50% elderly w/LTC needs without family in NHs • 7% elderly w/LTC needs with family in NHs

  23. Assisted Living:Issues and Future Trends • Fastest growing senior housing • State, facility definition/regs vary • Quality unknown • Few available to moderate/low income • Medicaid support for assisted living facilities (ALFs) increasing • Limitation of ALFs for dementia • Primary cause for discharge – need for more care – ASPE/Hawes study • Currently, ALFs rarely replace NHs

  24. Who Are the LTC Caregivers? • 80% of LTC provided by informal caregivers: family and friends – 73% women; average age 60 • Formal caregivers: Nursing assistants, home care aides, personal care workers – typical worker middle-aged, single mom, little education, poor • Large percent African American, Asian, or Hispanic workers, particularly in cities

  25. Formal/Informal Caregivers: Challenges and Trends • Informal caregivers – backbone of LTC need emotional, practical, and $$ support • 33+ States have caregiver support programs – 30 are respite care; 50% of States pay caregivers • Most funding for informal care is State $$ • Formal LTC aide recruitment/retention major issue in most States • 30+ States – wage “pass-through” • Other training/career support needed

  26. Quality in LTCHow Can It Be Improved? • NH reform in Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (OBRA) ’87 – quality improvements but problems remain • 1999 GAO Report – additional steps needed to strengthen enforcement of Federal quality standards in NHs • Difficult issues for State policymakers: • Nurse staffing levels in NH • Medicaid payment rates

  27. Quality in LTC:How Can It Be Improved? • Quality in LTC difficult to define  medical and social services • Two LTC populations: clients and families • Serves clients with complex problems • Takes place over extended periods with periodic use of acute and subacute care • Shortcomings of existing quality oversight • CMS’s Nursing Home Compare • CMS’s Home Health Compare

  28. Long Term Care Challenges and Options for States in a Time of Budget Crisis: Where Do We Go From Here?

  29. FY’06 Budget Proposal:Implications for States • Proposed $60 billion savings in Medicaid over 10 years • New Freedom Initiative Proposals • More flexibility for HCBS • Money follows the person rebalancing demo • Limits on Medicaid funding for optional services?

  30. Three Broad State Strategies to Control LTC Spending • Reform delivery system to provide care more efficiently • Expand HCBS • Integrate acute and LTC: managed care • Increase private and Federal resources • Reduce Medicaid eligibility, reimbursement, and services

  31. Build Community Options • Home- and community-based options • Expansion of Medicaid 1915(c) waivers • Systems Changes for Community Living grants – CMS (HCFA*) • Olmstead – impact on HCBS • Respite programs • Adult day services *formerly Health Care Financing Administration

  32. Support Informal Caregivers • Respite care • Education and training • Support groups • Tax credits • Range of services funded by Older Americans Act and Medicaid waiver programs • $$ to informal caregivers

  33. Recruit and Retain Formal LTC Workforce • Establish “wage pass-throughs” • Increase worker fringe benefits • Develop career ladders • Increase and improve training requirements • Develop new worker pools including former welfare workers • Wellspring model of quality improvement

  34. Support Consumer Direction • Issue driven by younger people • Permits person to arrange own care; spend as sees fit, allows hiring family • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJ)/CMS cash and counseling demos • To reduce unmet need • Same or lower public cost • Increased satisfaction • AK, NJ, FL • Independence Plus Waiver – FL, LA, SC, NH

  35. More Private/Federal $Private LTC Insurance • Role of private LTC insurance unknown: 11% in 2002 • Upper income likely market • High cost of policies • Potential may depend on development of employer-based group market • National Claimant Study  ASPE/RWJ • Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP) LTC insurance benefit – 2002 • Similar State offerings – MI, MN

  36. Educate Boomers About LTC • “The Costs of LTC: Public Perceptions vs. Reality” – AARP survey • Underestimate costs • Falsely think their insurance covers LTC • 50% believe Medicare covers LTC • Denial about need for LTC • Boomers need to plan for future

  37. Hallmarks of a Comprehensive LTC System • Philosophy of care • One State organization responsible for all functions • Access to multiple funding sources • Single appropriation for Medicaid LTC services • Streamlined functional and financial eligibility • Comprehensive entry points • Standardized assessment tool Source: Mollica and Reinhard, Recommendations of State policy leaders, RWJ funded, 2004.

  38. Hallmarks of a Comprehensive LTC System (cont’d) • Full array of in-home, residential, and institutional services • Information and assistance • Consumer-directed services • Care coordinators assigned to NH to assist with relocation • Quality assurance and improvement system • Integration of health and LTC services

  39. State Innovations in LTC • Consolidate State LTC programs and dollars in single State agency MA and NJ • Expand consumer direction AK, NJ, FL • Single appropriation for Medicaid LTC OR, MD, WA • Adopt assessment and care management practices to target resources to most in need

  40. State Innovations in LTC • Maine and Oregon― Reduce NH utilization – increase home care and residential alternatives • Texas and Minnesota ― integrates LTC and acute care services and financing in managed care (Evercare) • Wisconsin―Family Care Program, comprehensive entry point

  41. Future Trends • Financing likely to continue as patchwork of public and private sources • Medicaid will continue as primary public funding – wide State variation • States continue to expand HCBS • States expand consumer direction through Medicaid and State funding • Tax strategies for incremental reforms

More Related