1 / 5

IS TRANSPARENCY A LUXURY ITEM?

IS TRANSPARENCY A LUXURY ITEM? . SECURITY THREATS Prof Al Roberts CLIMATE CHANGE Joseph Foti, WRI GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS Sean Moulton, OMB Watch RESPONDENT Tom Susman, ABA. Transparency may be ‘delivering’, but won’t it sometimes ‘get in the way’?.

jeroen
Download Presentation

IS TRANSPARENCY A LUXURY ITEM?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IS TRANSPARENCY ALUXURY ITEM? • SECURITY THREATS Prof Al Roberts • CLIMATE CHANGE Joseph Foti, WRI • GLOBAL ECONOMIC CRISIS Sean Moulton, OMB Watch • RESPONDENT Tom Susman, ABA

  2. Transparency may be ‘delivering’, but won’t it sometimes ‘get in the way’?

  3. SECURITY THREATS, CLIMATE CHANGE & ECONOMIC CRISIS…Competing Public Interest Concerns • ‘Higher Public Interest Concerns’: safety; global warming; economic growth/jobs… • Secrecy ‘Trumps’ Transparency… • Public demand for transparency is less • If they are determined to keep it secret they will anyway… • All highly technical anyway…no point, and no need to know

  4. ISSUES: • Openness in the ‘wrong’ places may undermine the ‘cause’ of transparency • Some ‘Strategic’ Secrecy is necessary to win the overall war for openness? • Higher Test to satisfy…. • Avoid glib arguments; need to be specific about the competing public interest concerns

  5. TEST • To see if we can make the case for transparency even in most demanding of cases/policy areas • If we can’t win the argument here, not much point winning it elsewhere • Equally: proponents of secrecy, must be specific about why transparency is counter-productive or has unintended consequences

More Related