200 likes | 314 Views
MANITOBA CENTRE FOR HEALTH POLICY. Estimating PCH Bed Projections. Norman Frohlich Carolyn De Coster Natalia Dik. Authors: Norman Frohlich Carolyn De Coster Natalia Dik. Look at historical use Identify factors that help to explain use
E N D
MANITOBA CENTRE FOR HEALTH POLICY Estimating PCH Bed Projections Norman Frohlich Carolyn De Coster Natalia Dik
Look at historical use Identify factors that help to explain use Model future demand using MBS population projections Method
Sociodemographic Health Functional status Supports (formal & informal) Health system Factors - potential
age, sex, region readily available capture underlying changes not available in data Factors - used
1. Trend Analysis 2. Recent Use 3. Combined Three models
Looked at patterns over ten years by age and sex groupings Found PCH days/1000 population going down 1. Trend analysis
What was average use over last three years? Project forward to year 2020 2. Recent Use
Mean of Trend Analysis and Recent Use Captures downward trend in use but modifies by recent patterns. 3. Combined method
Current capacity: 4084 75+ Formula: 4511 Trend Analysis: 3413 Recent Use: 4817 Combined: 4115 Results: Non-Winnipeg
Use Combined Method Our recommendation
Central: 37 North Eastman: - 34 South Eastman: - 129 Interlake: - 151 Nor-Man: -7 Surpluses and Deficits, 2020
Parkland: 102 Burntwood/Churchill: -24 Brandon: - 13 Marquette: 63 South Westman: 125 Winnipeg: 538 Surpluses and Deficits, 2020
Migration not factored in 89% of residents stay in RHA ‘under-bedded’ RHAs have higher movement out Limitations
Changes in resources e.g. home care, hospital occupancy, could change estimates Population projections could be incorrect Limitations
More PCH beds in Non-Winnipeg though this varies by RHA Models use readily available data and should be checked frequently Bottom Line
M Manitoba Centrefor Health Policy C H P www.umanitoba.ca/centres/mchp