1 / 17

Megan R. Evans ECU Master’s Thesis NCMEA Convention 11/14/2011

An Investigation of Factors that Contribute to Discontinuing Instrumental Music Instruction in Middle School. Megan R. Evans ECU Master’s Thesis NCMEA Convention 11/14/2011. Review of Literature. Recruitment and retention are essential for successful instrumental programs

jescie-solis
Download Presentation

Megan R. Evans ECU Master’s Thesis NCMEA Convention 11/14/2011

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An Investigation of Factors that Contribute to Discontinuing Instrumental Music Instruction in Middle School Megan R. Evans ECU Master’s Thesis NCMEA Convention 11/14/2011

  2. Review of Literature • Recruitment and retention are essential for successful instrumental programs • Results of recruitment efforts may not be visible for several years • Study is warranted to make these efforts as successful as possible

  3. Review of Literature: Recruiting • Should occur frequently, not once (Cole, 2010; Romines, 2003) • Directors should create recruiting plan, including: • Defined goals • Plan • Evaluation of plan (Bazan, 2009; Romines, 2003) • Communication is key! (Include parents, students, and other teachers) (Albert, 2006; Bayley, 2004; Hamann, n.d.; Hurley, 1995; Mixon, 2005) • Details about the program may encourage parents to register student for beginning band (Fischer & Hamburg, 2001; Mixon, 2005) • Creating a recruiting video may be helpful (Romines, 2003; Schilf, 2008)

  4. Review of Literature – Recruiting (cont.) • Directors must be mindful of students with low socioeconomic statuses and provide support when needed (Corenblum & Marshall, 1998; Wolfe, 1969) • Need to be highly visible at feeder schools and build positive relationships with future students (Bazan, 2009; Davis, 2009; Fischer & Hamburg, 2001; Hayes, 2005; Hurley, 1995; Mixon, 2005; Romines, 2003; Rowley, 2001; Schilf, 2008; Sedburry, 2008) • Average dropout rate between MS and HS is 50% (Hamann, n.d.; “How Many Students,” 2004; Wolfman, 2003) • Using peers to talk to future students can be very effective (Bazan, 2009; Fischer & Hamburg, 2001; Sedburry, 2008; “The Continuous Battle,” 2010) • Discuss social aspect of band with potential students (Baker, 2009; Wolfman, 2003)

  5. Review of Literature – Recruiting (cont.) • Recruiting concerts at feeder schools are essential (Sedburry, 2001) • Music performed should be fun and familiar (Fischer & Hamburg, 2001) • Use male and female students equally to speak and demonstrate instruments (Cole, 2010) • Hands-on sessions are important (Bazan, 2009; Bazan, 2005) • Always strive to build positive relationships with all potential students!

  6. Review of Literature - Retention • Students who stop taking classes in the arts seldom re-enroll (“How Many Students,” 2004) • Communication with all parties is still key (Cole, 2010; Corenblum & Marshall, 1998) • Must build positive relationships with students, set high standards, and give positive feedback in the classroom (Ackerley, 2009; Albert, 2006; Davis, 2009; Hurley, 1995; Mixon, 2005; Person, 2009; Stewart, 2005; Strouse, 2003) • Scheduling plays an essential role – directors should get involved! (Gamin, 2005; Hurley, 2009, Wolfman, 2003) • Directors must give support to ALL students

  7. Review of Literature – Retention (cont.) • Directors need to nurture skills in all students, regardless of gender, race, home language (Mixon, 2005) • Private lessons can be beneficial (Hamann, n.d.; Stewart, 2005) • Socioeconomic status is large predictor of retention (Kinney, 2010; Klinedinst, 1991; McCarthy, 1980) • Build on strengths of community (Corenblum & Marshall, 1998; Mixon, 2005) • Provide basic necessities for band to students when possible (Albert, 2006; Fischer & Hamburg, 2001; Mixon, 2005) • Schedule practice time before or after school (Gamin, 2005; Mixon, 2005) • Instrumental music must appeal to and be accessible to all students! (“The Continuous Battle,” 2010)

  8. What percentage of students decide to discontinue middle school band? What are the specific factors that affect the discontinuation of middle school band? Research Questions

  9. Method • 160 6th and 7th grade students from a Central NC county were eligible to participate from a variety of demographics (Corenblum & Marshall, 1998; Kinney, 2010; McCarthy, 1980) • 123 students completed consent forms and participated in study • Questionnaire was developed containing both qualitative and quantitative aspects (Madsen & Duke, 1999; Madsen & Kelly, 2002) • 3 band directors provided feedback on survey before it was administered • Survey was administered during class time • Most students completed in 10 minutes or less

  10. 123 students completed survey Data from 31 surveys were analyzed (only those from students not intending to continue with band) Resulted in 63 comments Placed in taxonomic structure Results

  11. Taxonomic Structure of Comments • All 63 survey comments from students who did not intend to continue with instrumental music were printed onto individual sheets of paper • Comments were first placed in two categories: Internal or External Classroom Factors • From there, comments were broken down into smaller factors • Independent observer reviewed categories and discussed minor changes with researcher • Additional independent observer established a reliability of .85

  12. Discussion/Internal Classroom Factors • 75% retention rate in this study - higher than results from some previous studies (Gamin, 205; Hamann, n.d.; Hartley, 2009; “How Many Students,” 2004; Wolfman, 2003) • 30 comments were Internal Classroom factors (48% of all responses) • Loss of Student Interest was largest factor • Did not find band class fun • Did not like having to complete practice charts

  13. Discussion/Internal Classroom Factors (cont.) • Classroom Concerns (11 of 30 responses) • Physical pain caused in class • Class was too difficult or too easy • Frustration with instrument breaking • Teacher Influence (4 responses) • Discontinuation not because of band teacher

  14. Discussion/External Classroom Factors • Contained 33 of the 63 responses on the surveys (52% of responses) • Scheduling – largest factor • 17 comments from students • Students want to take other classes (computers, art, Spanish) but cannot fit current school into schedule

  15. Discussion/External Classroom Factors (cont.) • Time Constraints (14 responses) • Band interferes with after-school activities • No time to practice and therefore cannot turn in practice charts • Miscellaneous (2 responses) • Family did not want student to participate • Did not want to carry instrument back and forth

  16. Discussion/Implications of the Findings • Two largest factors determining whether students will continue with instrumental music are scheduling and loss of student interest • Directors should be involved in the scheduling at their school and allow students to give input into the classroom when possible • Findings are also applicable for high school directors

  17. ReferencesFor a full list of references, please visit http://iss.schoolwires.com/Page/35883

More Related