1 / 30

TPS: A Time-Based Positioning Scheme for outdoor Wireless Sensor Networks

TPS: A Time-Based Positioning Scheme for outdoor Wireless Sensor Networks. Authors: Xiuzhen Cheng, Andrew Thaeler, Guoliang Xue, Dechang Chen From IEEE INFOCOM 2004. Outline. Introduction Overview of Location Detection Techniques. Outline. Introduction The challenge of Location Discovery

jessamine-french
Download Presentation

TPS: A Time-Based Positioning Scheme for outdoor Wireless Sensor Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. TPS: A Time-Based Positioning Scheme for outdoor Wireless Sensor Networks Authors: Xiuzhen Cheng, Andrew Thaeler, Guoliang Xue, Dechang Chen From IEEE INFOCOM 2004

  2. Outline • Introduction • Overview of Location Detection Techniques

  3. Outline • Introduction • The challenge of Location Discovery • Overview of TPS

  4. The challenge of Location Discovery • The algorithm must be distributed and localized ( scalable ). • The protocol must has low communication and computation overhead • The positioning functionality should not increase the cost and complexity of the sensor • The location detection scheme must be robust. • TPS proposed in this research is designed to meet these challenges.

  5. Overview of Location detection Scheme • Two phase of major current sensor location detection schemes : • Range or angle measurement • Calculations • Some schemes perform a refinement phase

  6. Types of Existing Approaches • Time based methods • Time-of-Arrival (ToA) • Time-Difference-of-Arrival (TDoA) • Received-Signal-Strength-Indicator (RSSI) • Angle-of-Arrival (AoA) • Range estimation use network connectivity • DV-hop • DV-distance • Euclidean

  7. ToA (Time-of-Arrival) • Processing delays and non-LOS propagation can introduce errors • Requires synchronization to accurately measure time-of-flight.

  8. TDoA (Time-Difference-of-Arrival)

  9. RSSI (Received-Signal-Strength-Indicator) • Computes distance based on transmitted and received power levels and a radio propagation model. • RSSI is mainly used with RF signals. • Due to multipath fading ,RSSI can be inaccurate .

  10. AoA (Angle-of-Arrival) • The calculations of triangulation is simple. • It’s difficult to measure accurately when a sensor is surrounded by scattering objects • Sensors or BS should equip with directive antennas or antennae arrays, which may be prohibitive due to cost and form factors.

  11. Overview of TPS • Based on TDoA (Time-Difference-of-Arrival) of RF signals measured locally at a sensor to detect range differences from the sensor to 3 BSs. • These range differences are averaged over multiple beacon intervals before they are combined to estimate the sensor location through trilateration.

  12. Overview of TPS • Not iterative • Refine position estimates by averaging time difference measurements prior to calculating position. • This averaging requires less computation than repeatedly solving linear system matrices, least squares or multilateration algorithms.

  13. Using network connectivity • If a sensor can not receive signals from enough BSs, • ≥ 2 for AoA • ≥ 3 for ToA, TDoA, and RSSI none of the previous techniques will work. • Network connectivity can be used for range estimation

  14. DV-hop • BSs flood their positions to all nodes in the network. • Sensors compute the minimum distance in hops to several base stations. • BSs compute an average distance per hop to other BSs. • BSs then flood this information to the whole network allowing nodes to calculate their positions.

  15. Example of DV-hop • L1 computes the correction (estimated average size of one hop) (100+40)/(6+2) = 17.5 6 hops 2 hops

  16. DV-distance • DV-distance replaces hop counts with cumulative range estimates in meters estimated from RSSI.

  17. AHLoS • A TDoA based scheme • BSs transmit both ultrasound and RF signals simultaneously. • The RF signal is used for synchronization purposes. • A sensor will measure the difference of the arrival times between the two signals and determine the range to the base station. • Multilateration is applied to combine range estimates to generate location data. • AHLoS provides fine-grained localization capability.

  18. Ultrasound transceivers can only cover a short range (several meters) • large numbers of base stations may be required to cover large areas. • Multilateration

  19. Advantages of TPS • Offers scalability - Sensors independently compute their positions. • Requires no time synchronization - using a local clock • Sensors do require the ability to measure the difference in signal arrival times with precision • No requirements for an ultrasound receiver, second radio or specialized antennae at BS or sensors.

  20. Advantages of TPS • The computation overhead is low • Multilateration based systems require matrix operations to optimize the objective functions • No communication overhead • Sensors listen passively and make no radio transmissions. • BS transmit all the beacon signals. • This conserves sensor energy and reduces RF channel use.

More Related