80 likes | 94 Views
This reference discusses a spike observed in MIP events without PE smearing. It explores a common block mistake and the use of RawHit for energy calculation. It also suggests some event selection criteria to analyze the spike.
E N D
TP Calorimetry Jaewon Park
MIP event without PE smearing? • Why it shows spike? (not zero values)
Common common block mistake • I though the spike might be a bug in the code • In stead, I found the other bug • I used own common block to copy rawhit into buffer. • I thought 500 maxhit would be enough but tracker used higher limit (3500) • If rawhit is more than 500 (2-3% event), it overwrite other ntuple block.
Ntuples • NT block • RawHit : geant true hit • CalObj : Probably PE smeared hit • DigHit : I don’t understand this. Energy entry holds integer. • In old study, I used CalObj block and occasionally RawHit block for consistency check. • Current code used RawHit to calculate energy. I don’t remember why I used RawHit. • Probably the format is slightly easier to use and I thought PE smearing is not big effect.
Try to some event selection • Low energy criteria works.
Leakage? • Probably we can do very much about higher energy proton (KE>300MeV)
Require no proton hit in last layers • Requiring no proton hit in last some DS-Ecal layer • It helps a little bit.