130 likes | 145 Views
This document discusses the need for better metrics to measure trade in value-added, in order to address issues such as bilateral trade imbalances, supply chain shocks, and the impact of trade on jobs. It highlights the importance of interconnected input-output tables and international collaboration to institutionalize estimates of trade in value-added. The document also outlines the current initiatives and data sharing efforts between OECD, IDE-JETRO, and WTO, and proposes a work plan to improve the nature of assumptions and estimates relating to bilateral trade flows, services, firm-level data, intangibles, and property income flows.
E N D
Measuring Trade in Value-AddedOECD National Accounts Working Party Meeting Paris October 2011 Contact: nadim.ahmad@oecd.org
Trade in Value-Added • Increasing recognition that gross estimates of trade may create ‘misleading perceptions’ (Pascal Lamy), and imperfect policies in a number of areas, including: • dealing with bilateral trade imbalances • dealing with the impact of macro-economic shocks on supply-chains • understanding the importance of trade to jobs • Leading to a call for new metrics that better respond to these issues.
The iPod Distribution of the value added The Apple iPod = 299$ of Chinese ‘exports’ to US • 299 US$ • 75$ profit to US (Apple) • 73$ whls/retail US (Apple) • 75$ to Japan (Toshiba) • 60$ 400 parts from Asia • 15$ 16 parts from the US • 2$ assembly by China 3 http://blogs.computerworld.com/node/5724
Responding to needs • IO tables provide a means to respond to these developments by measuring interconnectedness of trade and trade in value-added terms. • A number of initiatives have been launched using interconnected IO tables ( a world IO table). • Including a two-year project of the OECD (STD/TAD/STI).
International Collaboration • Various initiatives pooling resources to identify best practices for allocation of bilateral trade flows within IO tables. • But recognition: • that a long-term approach is needed to ‘institutionalise’ estimates of trade in value-added. • And that its international nature requires the involvement of an international agency or international consortia. • Formalising collaboration with WTO and IDE-JETRO, and exploring closers links with USITC.
Indicator & data sharing with IDE-JETRO and WTO in TiVA Project Common to WTO and the OECD: publically available • Value added in trade “headline” indicator: • bilateral flows; • by sector to the degree possible. Shared by OECD and IDE-JETRO Input-Output tables, methodological assumptions and bilateral trade flow data OECD “analytical” data on trade in services, trade by enterprise, intangibles and income flows. OECD only
What do we know now: Import contents of exports (2005) Source: OECD Inter-country inter-industry model (March 2011)
Import contents of exports Source: OECD Inter-country I-O model, 2011
And globalisation continues apace • As production processes continue to become more fragmented and chains become more interconnected. • Processing trade increasing in China. • Driven by technological advancement, reduced transaction costs and trade policy reform. • Reinforcing the need for on-going and robust estimates
Work Plan • Estimates can be produced now, but necessarily require assumptions relating to BTD IO flows. • Much of the work over next two years will be in improving the nature of these assumptions, by: • Developing improved estimates of BTD by Industry and End-Use • Improving BTD by services • Using firm-level micro data • Decomposing value-added into ‘labour’ and ‘capital’ flows. • Contribution of intangibles (R&D and software) • And investigating the scope to trace property income flows.
Tangibles vs. intangibles Investment in fixed and intangible assets as a percentage of GDP, 2006 Source: OECD STI Scoreboard 2011. Data on intangible investment are based on COINVEST [www.coinvest.org.uk] and national estimates by researchers. Data for fixed investment are OECD calculations based on OECD, Annual National Accounts and EU KLEMS Databases, March 2010.
What can WPNA do? • Support the initiative and related developments especially in: • Bilateral trade flows • Measurement of IPP investment by industry • Continue to improve comparability of employment estimates with value-added. • More detailed IO tables? • Breakdowns by Foreign/domestic ownership?