310 likes | 323 Views
Economic opportunities of wetland rewetting and paludiculture. Hans Joosten Uni-Greifswald: Peatland Studies & Palaeo-ecology International Mire Conservation Group Belarus UNFCCC delegation. Reasons for rewetting. For the climate Against fire.. Because of pumping costs
E N D
Economic opportunities of wetland rewetting and paludiculture Hans Joosten Uni-Greifswald: Peatland Studies & Palaeo-ecology International Mire Conservation Group Belarus UNFCCC delegation
Reasons for rewetting • For the climate • Against fire.. • Because of pumping costs • For social reasons… Fascist demonstration in Amklam 31 July 2010…
Rewetting of peatland is good for the climate • More climatic profit can even be made by using rewetted peatlands for biomass cultivation • To replace fossil fuels and fossil raw materials • 500,000 km2 of degraded peatlands • PALUDICULTURE !!
Paludiculture • Drainage of peatlands for conventional agriculture, forestry and peat extraction is responsible for 2 Gtons of CO2 emissions. • Drained peatlands are increasingly used for the production of biofuels. • This generally leads to (much) larger CO2-emissions from oxidizing peat soil than can be saved by replacing fossil fuels.
Germany …mais on destroyed peatland for biogas…
…although biofuels from drained peatland produce 3 – 9 times more CO2 than burning coal…
Roswarowo, Poland Paludiculture is agriculture on wet/rewetted peatlands
Paludiculture • Paludiculture is an innovative alternative to conventional drainage-based peatland agri- and silviculture • Ideally the peatlands should be so wet that peat is conserved and peat accumulation is re-installed. • Paludiculture uses that part of net primary production that is not necessary for peat formation (80-90% of NPP).
Paludiculture • In the temperate, subtropical and tropical zones, peat is generally formed by roots and rhizomes. • Aboveground parts can be harvested without harming peat formation.
Biomass from wet peatlands in temperate Europe. Q* = quality demand : ++ = high. + = medium, 0 = low).
Paludiculture Paludicultures on rewetted drained peatlands contribute to climate change mitigation in two ways: • by reducing GHG emissions from drained peatland soils • by replacing fossil resources by renewable biomass alternatives.
Example: common reed • Rewetting results in a GHG emission reduction of 15 t CO2-eq∙ha-1∙a-1. • The reed of 1 hectare can replace fossil fuels in a cogeneration plant that would otherwise emit 15 t CO2. • Emissions from handling amount to 2 t CO2-eq ha-1. • Using reed from paludiculture would thus avoid emissions of almost 30 t CO2-eq∙ha-1∙a-1
Reed (Phragmites australis) Productivity: 3 – 25 t DM/ha*a Harvest cycle: 1 - 2 yr Peat accumulation: ++/0
Alder (Alnus glutinosa) Productivity: 3 – 10 t DM/ha*a Harvest cycle: 60-70 yr Peat accumulation: +/0
Briquetting of peatland biomasse in Poland
Nov 2004 Mai 2004 Aug 2005 Peatmoss cultivation as peat alternative in horticulture Aug 2006
Peatmoss farming: avoids up to 50 ton CO2 ha-1 a-1: 20 by rewetting drained bogland + 25 by replacing fossil peat + 5 by avoiding international transport
Kalimantan: Jelutung on rewetted peat swamp Kalimantan
Most paludicultures can compete with normal drainage based agriculture. Substantial market distortion because of agricultural subventions (EU: ‘paludiculture is no agriculture’). Paludicultures do not compete with food production. Paludiculture is a cheap and effective way to reduce emissions Paludiculture